Bloom Corporation purchased $1,750,000 of Taylor Company 5% bonds, at their face amount, with the intent and ability to hold the bonds until they matured in 2025, so Bloom classifies its investment as AFS. Unfortunately, a combination of problems at Taylor Company and in the debt securities market caused the fair value of the Taylor investment to decline to $1,200,000 during 2021. The following are the two alternative scenarios that should be analyzed independent of each other.
Required:
1. Prepare appropriate entry(s) at December 31,
2021 and indicate how the scenario will affect the 2021 income
statement, OCI, and comprehensive income.
2. Prepare appropriate entry(s) at December 31,
2021. Assume that, at the end of 2020, Bloom had recorded an
unrealized loss of $137,500 on the Taylor investment.
Bloom Corporation purchased $1,750,000 of Taylor Company 5% bonds, at their face amount, with the intent...
Bloom Corporation purchased $1,750,000 of Taylor Company 5% bonds, at their face amount, with the intent and ability to hold the bonds until they matured in 2025, so Bloom classifies its investment as AFS. Unfortunately, a combination of problems at Taylor Company and in the debt securities market caused the fair value of the Taylor investment to decline to $1,200,000 during 2021. The following are the two alternative scenarios that should be analyzed independent of each other. 1. Bloom now...
2 Part 2 Homework i Bloom Corporation purchased $1,000,000 of Taylor Company 5% bonds at their face amount, with the intent and ability to hold the bonds until they matured in 2025, so Bloom classifies its investment as AFS. Unfortunately, a combination of problems at Taylor Company and in the debt securities market caused the fair value of the Taylor investment to decline to $600,000 during 2021 The following are the two alternative scenarios that should be analyzed independent of...
2 Part 2 Homework i Seved Bloom Corporation purchased $1,000,000 of Taylor Company 5% bonds at their face amount, with the intent and ability to hold the bonds until they matured in 2025, so Bloom classifies its investment as HTM. Unfortunately, a combination of problems at Taylor Company and in the debt securities market caused the fair value of the Taylor investment to decline to $600,000 during 2021 The following are the two alternative scenarios that should be analyzed independent...
Exercise 12-3 Bloom Corporation purchased $1,900,000 of Taylor Company 5% bonds at par and classifies their investment as AFS, Unfortunately, a combination of problems at Taylor Company and in the debt market caused the fair value of the Taylor investment to decline to $1,320,000 during 2018. Consider each of the following as independent situation. 1. Bloom now believes it is more likely than not that it will have to sell the Taylor bonds before the bonds have a chance to...
Exercise 12-30 Held-to-maturity securities; impairments (Appendix 128) [LO12-2, 12-8] Bloom Corporation purchased $1.200,000 of Taylor Company 5% bonds at par with the intent and ability to hold the bonds until they matured in 2025, so Bloom Classifies their investment as HTM. Unfortunately, a combination of problems at Taylor Company and in the debt market caused the fair value of the Taylor investment to decline to $760,000 during 2018. Consider each of the following as an Independent situation 1. Bloom now...
LED Corporation owns $1,750,000 of Branch Pharmaceuticals bonds and classifies its investment as securities available-for-sale. The market price of Branch’s bonds fell by $1,200,000, due to concerns about one of the company’s principal drugs. The concerns were justified when the FDA banned the drug. $100,000 of that decline in value already had been included in OCI as a temporary unrealized loss in a prior period. LED views $800,000 of the $1,200,000 loss as related to credit losses, and the other...
Jones Inc. 6% bonds, purchased at face value, with an amortized cost of $3,950,000, and classified as an available-for-sale investment. Because of unrealized losses prior to 2021, the Jones bonds have a fair value adjustment account with a credit balance of $550,000, such that the carrying value of the Jones Investment is $3,400,000 prior to making any adjusting entries In 2021. At December 31, 2021, the Jones Investment had a fair value of $2,850,000, and Stewart calculated that $300,000 of...
Wang Corporation purchased $220,000 of Hales Inc. 8% bonds at par in 2020 with the intent and ability to hold the bonds until the bonds mature in 2025, so Wang classifies its investment as held-to-maturity. Unfortunately, a combination of problems at Hales and in the debt market caused the fair value of the Hales investment to decline to $180,000 during 2021. Wang applies the CECL model to account for its investment and calculates that, of the $40,000 drop in fair...
10:08 AM Thu Feb 20 437% a Aas 1. Bee Company 5% bonds, purchased at face value, with an amortized cost of $4,000,000, and classified as held to maturity. At December 31, 2018, the Bee investment had a fair value of $3,500,000, and Stewart calculated that S240,000 of the fair value decline is a credit loss and $260,000 is a noncredit loss. At December 31, 2019, the Bee investment had a fair value of $3,700,000, and Stewart calculated that $140,000...
Wang Corporation purchased $180,000 of Hales Inc. 7% bonds at par with the intent and ability to hold the bonds until they matured in 2022, so Wang classifies its investment as held to maturity. Unfortunately, a combination of problems at Hales and in the debt market caused the fair value of the Hales investment to decline to $143,000 during 2018. Wang views this decline as an other-than-temporary (OTT) impairment. Wang calculates that, of the $37,000 drop in fair value, $15,000...