Can you help me, please
Capital Budgeting Decision
Since LX corporation is producing at full capacity, Amanda has decided to have Han examine the feasibility of a new manufacturing plant. This expansion would represent a major capital outlay for the company. A preliminary analysis of the project has been conducted at a cost of $1.6 million. This analysis determined that the new plant will require an immediate outlay of $54 million and an additional outlay of $31 million in one year. The company has received a special tax dispensation that will allow the building and equipment to be depreciated on a 20-year MACRS schedule.
Switchover to straight-line depreciation.
For Property Placed in Service after December 31, 1986
Recovery Year |
3-Year (200% DB) |
5-Year (200% DB) |
7-Year (200% DB) |
10-Year (200% DB) |
15-Year (150% DB) |
20-Year (150% DB) |
1 |
33.33 |
20.00 |
14.29 |
10.00 |
5.00 |
3.750 |
2 |
44.45 |
32.00 |
24.49 |
18.00 |
9.50 |
7.219 |
3 |
14.81* |
19.20 |
17.49 |
14.40 |
8.55 |
6.677 |
4 |
7.41 |
11.52* |
12.49 |
11.52 |
7.70 |
6.177 |
5 |
11.52 |
8.93* |
9.22 |
6.93 |
5.713 |
|
6 |
5.76 |
8.92 |
7.37 |
6.23 |
5.285 |
|
7 |
8.93 |
6.55* |
5.90* |
4.888 |
||
8 |
4.46 |
6.55 |
5.90 |
4.522 |
||
9 |
6.56 |
5.91 |
4.462* |
|||
10 |
6.55 |
5.90 |
4.461 |
|||
11 |
3.28 |
5.91 |
4.462 |
|||
12 |
5.90 |
4.461 |
||||
13 |
5.91 |
4.462 |
||||
14 |
5.90 |
4.461 |
||||
15 |
5.91 |
4.462 |
||||
16 |
2.95 |
4.461 |
||||
17 |
4.462 |
|||||
18 |
4.461 |
|||||
19 |
4.462 |
|||||
20 |
4.461 |
|||||
21 |
2.231 |
*Switchover to straight-line depreciation.
Because of the time necessary to build the new plant, no sales will be possible for the next year. Two years from now, the company will have partial-year sales of $17 million. Sales in the following four years will be $28 million, $37 million, $40 million, and $43 million. Because the new plant will be more efficient than LX corporation's current manufacturing facilities, variable costs are expected to be 65 percent of sales, and fixed costs will be $2.4 million per year. The new plant will also require net working capital amounting to 8 percent of sales for the next year.
Han realizes that sales from the new plant will continue into the indefinite future. Because of this, he believes the cash flows after Year 5 will continue to grow at 2.5 percent indefinitely. The company's tax rate is 40 percent and the required return is 12 percent.
4) After the empirical results, Han would like to provide the recommendation to Amanda and Board of Directors, what is Han's recommendation? Amanda also wants Han to provide a sensitivity analysis and change any one of elements documented before and see what happens? For example, increase or decrease growth rate and at what level the firm can break even when NPV=0.
Solution:
The above question have two part answer.
Part A: Recommendations of Han for Capital Budgeting Decision.
Part B: Senstivity Analysis.
Let us answer one by one, Part A : Recommendation of Capital Budgeting Decision.
Part A:
Preliminary analysis of the project at a cost of $1.6 million is a sunk cost and will be ignored in the capital budgeting decision.
Here given the discounting factor of 12% , assuming it is a pre tax discount rate , thereby adjusting with the tax rate of 40% , the post tax rate is 12% (1-0.40)= 7.2%, we will use this post tax discount rate for discounting cash flows.
The company has received a special tax dispensation that will allow the building and equipment to be depreciated on a 20-year MACRS schedule.
Switch over to straight-line depreciation. Therefore taking the 20-Year (150% DB) for depreciation and thereby we will calculate present value of depreciation tax shield /saving. Since Tax Benefit for Depreciation is of 21 years, we will calculate the cash flows for 21 years first, then for indefinite period.
Years | Sales ( In $ million) | Variable Cost ( In $ Million) (65% of Sales) | Contribution (In $ Million) | Fixed Cost (In $ Million) | Depreciation ( In $ Million) ( Refer Note) | EBIT | Taxes @40% | EBT | Depreciation ( In $ Million) ( Refer Note) | Free Cash Flows | Discounting Factor @ 7.2% | Discounted Value (( In $ Million) |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.4 | 3.23 | -5.63 | -2.25 | -7.88 | 3.23 | -4.66 | 0.9328 | -4.35 |
2 | 17 | 11.05 | 5.95 | 2.4 | 6.21 | -2.66 | -1.06 | -3.72 | 6.21 | 2.49 | 0.8701 | 2.17 |
3 | 28 | 18.20 | 9.80 | 2.4 | 5.74 | 1.66 | 0.66 | 0.99 | 5.74 | 6.74 | 0.8117 | 5.47 |
4 | 37 | 24.05 | 12.95 | 2.4 | 5.31 | 5.24 | 2.10 | 3.14 | 5.31 | 8.45 | 0.7572 | 6.40 |
5 | 40 | 26 | 14 | 2.4 | 4.45 | 7.15 | 2.86 | 4.29 | 4.45 | 8.74 | 0.7063 | 6.17 |
6 | 43 | 27.95 | 15.05 | 2.4 | 4.55 | 8.10 | 3.24 | 4.86 | 4.55 | 9.41 | 0.6589 | 6.20 |
Since after Year 5 , here it is at the end of 6th year , the sales will be increasing at the rate of 2.5% per year , for 7th year is 43*1.025= 44.075, similarly for following years. | ||||||||||||
7 | 44.08 | 28.65 | 15.43 | 2.4 | 4.20 | 8.82 | 3.53 | 5.29 | 4.20 | 9.50 | 0.6146 | 5.84 |
8 | 45.18 | 29.36 | 15.81 | 2.4 | 3.89 | 9.52 | 3.81 | 5.71 | 3.89 | 9.60 | 0.5733 | 5.50 |
9 | 46.31 | 30.10 | 16.21 | 2.4 | 3.84 | 9.97 | 3.99 | 5.98 | 3.84 | 9.82 | 0.5348 | 5.25 |
10 | 47.46 | 30.85 | 16.61 | 2.4 | 3.84 | 10.38 | 4.15 | 6.23 | 3.84 | 10.06 | 0.4989 | 5.02 |
11 | 48.65 | 31.62 | 17.03 | 2.4 | 3.84 | 10.79 | 4.32 | 6.47 | 3.84 | 10.31 | 0.4654 | 4.80 |
12 | 49.87 | 32.41 | 17.45 | 2.4 | 3.84 | 11.22 | 4.49 | 6.73 | 3.84 | 10.57 | 0.4341 | 4.59 |
13 | 51.11 | 33.22 | 17.89 | 2.4 | 3.84 | 11.65 | 4.66 | 6.99 | 3.84 | 10.83 | 0.4050 | 4.39 |
14 | 52.39 | 34.05 | 18.34 | 2.4 | 3.84 | 12.10 | 4.84 | 7.26 | 3.84 | 11.10 | 0.3778 | 4.19 |
15 | 53.70 | 34.91 | 18.80 | 2.4 | 3.84 | 12.56 | 5.02 | 7.53 | 3.84 | 11.37 | 0.3524 | 4.01 |
16 | 55.04 | 35.78 | 19.27 | 2.4 | 3.84 | 13.03 | 5.21 | 7.82 | 3.84 | 11.65 | 0.3287 | 3.83 |
17 | 56.42 | 36.67 | 19.75 | 2.4 | 3.84 | 13.51 | 5.40 | 8.11 | 3.84 | 11.94 | 0.3066 | 3.66 |
18 | 57.83 | 37.59 | 20.24 | 2.4 | 3.84 | 14.00 | 5.60 | 8.40 | 3.84 | 12.24 | 0.2860 | 3.50 |
19 | 59.28 | 38.53 | 20.75 | 2.4 | 3.84 | 14.51 | 5.80 | 8.71 | 3.84 | 12.54 | 0.2668 | 3.35 |
20 | 60.76 | 39.49 | 21.27 | 2.4 | 3.84 | 15.03 | 6.01 | 9.02 | 3.84 | 12.85 | 0.2489 | 3.20 |
21 | 62.28 | 40.48 | 21.80 | 2.4 | 1.92 | 17.48 | 6.99 | 10.49 | 1.92 | 12.41 | 0.2322 | 2.88 |
Total Discounted Cash Flows | 86.06 |
Total Discounted Cash Flows = $ 86.06 million
Determination of Present Value of Continuing Free Cash Flows
CV= Future Cash flows at year 22 (1+ growth)/Discounting factor- growth = 2.88(1.025)/0.072-0.025 = 2.952/0.047
= $62.80 million
Present Value of Continuing Free Cash flow = 62.80* Present Value Factor (7.2% , 21year ) = 62.80*0.2322= $14.58million
Total Cash Inflow = Total discounted cash flow + Present Value of Free Cash flow ( continuing) = $86.06 million + $14.58 million= $100.64 million
Present Cash outflow
Initial Cash outlay at Year 0 = $ 54 million
Add: Present Value of Additional Outlay at year 1 = $ 31*0.9328= $28.92 million
Add: Present Value of Working Capital ( as 8 % of next year sales at year 2)= 17*8%*0.8701= 1.18
Net Cash Outflow = ( 54+28.92+1.18) = $84.10 million
Net Present Value
a) Total Cash Inflow = $ 100.64 million
b) Less: Cash outflow= $ 84.10 Million
Net present Value ( a-b)= $16.54 Million
Since project NPV is positive therefore , the new manufacturing plant should be installed.
Note:
Year | Opening Balance (In $ Million) | Addition (In $ Million) | Closing Balance (In $ Million) | Depreciation Rate | Depreciation (In $ Million) |
0 | 54 | 0 | 54 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 54 | 31 | 86 | 3.750 | 3.23 |
2 | 86 | 7.219 | 6.21 | ||
3 | 86 | 6.677 | 5.74 | ||
4 | 86 | 6.177 | 5.31 | ||
5 | 86 | 5.173 | 4.45 | ||
6 | 86 | 5.285 | 4.55 | ||
7 | 86 | 4.888 | 4.20 | ||
8 | 86 | 4.522 | 3.89 | ||
9 | 86 | 4.462 | 3.84 | ||
10 | 86 | 4.461 | 3.84 | ||
11 | 86 | 4.462 | 3.84 | ||
12 | 86 | 4.461 | 3.84 | ||
13 | 86 | 4.462 | 3.84 | ||
14 | 86 | 4.461 | 3.84 | ||
15 | 86 | 4.462 | 3.84 | ||
16 | 86 | 4.461 | 3.84 | ||
17 | 86 | 4.462 | 3.84 | ||
18 | 86 | 4.461 | 3.84 | ||
19 | 86 | 4.462 | 3.84 | ||
20 | 86 | 4.461 | 3.84 | ||
21 | 86 | 2.231 | 1.92 |
Part B
Sensitivity Analysis
Here NPV = $ 16.54 million
Any of the elements change whether increase or decrease, let us change the machinery value by 10 % in Year 0 and Year 1, we get increase of ($54 million * 10%+ $ 31 million *10%*0.9328 ) = $8.29 million
we get percentage fall in NPV = 8.29/16.54 *100 = 50.13%
Can you help me, please Capital Budgeting Decision Since LX corporation is producing at full capacity,...
1) Amanda is not sure about the capital budgeting technique and want like Han to elaborate clearly what are and are not important elements to engage the capital budgeting decision for the LSUS corporation. Choice 2: Capital Budgeting Decision Since LSUS corporation is producing at full capacity, Amanda has decided to have Han examine the feasibility of a new manufacturing plant. This expansion would represent a major capital outlay for the company. A preliminary analysis of the project has been...
3) After the examine the three approaches, Amanda would like Han to analyze the financial viability of the new plant and calculate the profitability index, NPV, and IRR. Choice 2: Capital Budgeting Decision Since LSUS corporation is producing at full capacity, Amanda has decided to have Han examine the feasibility of a new manufacturing plant. This expansion would represent a major capital outlay for the company. A preliminary analysis of the project has been conducted at a cost of $1.6...
2) Amanda is recommended to use profitability index, NPV, and IRR, she wants Han to examine extensively the benefits and drawbacks of each approach Choice 2: Capital Budgeting Decision Since LSUS corporation is producing at full capacity, Amanda has decided to have Han examine the feasibility of a new manufacturing plant. This expansion would represent a major capital outlay for the company. A preliminary analysis of the project has been conducted at a cost of $1.6 million. This analysis determined...
4) After the empirical results, Han would like to provide the recommendation to Amanda and Board of Directors, what is Han’s recommendation? Amanda also wants Han to provide a sensitivity analysis and change any one of elements documented before and see what happens? For example, increase or decrease growth rate and at what level the firm can break even when NPV=0. Choice 2: Capital Budgeting Decision Since LSUS corporation is producing at full capacity, Amanda has decided to have Han...
vaughn Corporation purchased an asset at a cost of $56,250 on March 1, 2020. The asset has a useful life of 8 years and a salvage value of $4,500. For tax purposes, the MACRS class life is 5 years. Recovery Year 3-year (200% DB) 5-year (200% DB) 7-year (200% DB) 10-year (200% DB) 15-year (150% DB) 20-year (150% DB) 1 33.33 20.00 14.29 10.00 5.00 3.750 2 44.45 32.00 24.29 18.00 9.50 7.219 3 14.81* 19.20 17.49 14.40 8.55 6.677 ...
Sheffield Corporation purchased an asset at a cost of $58,750 on March 1, 2020. The asset has a useful life of 8 years and a salvage value of $4,700. For tax purposes, the MACRS class life is 5 years. MACRS Depreciation Rates by Class of Property Recovery Year 3-year (200% DB) 5-year (200% DB) 7-year (200% DB) 10-year (200% DB) 15-year (150% DB) 20-year (150% DB) 1 33.33 20.00 14.29 10.00 5.00 3.750 2 44.45 32.00 24.29 18.00 9.50 7.219 ...
Francis Corporation purchased an asset at a cost of $50,000 on March 1, 2020. The asset has a useful life of 8 years and a salvage value of $4,000. For tax purposes, the MACRS class life is 5 years. MACRS Depreciation Rates by Class of Property Recovery Year 3-year (200% DB) 5-year (200% DB) 7-year (200% DB) 10-year (200% DB) 15-year (150% DB) 20-year (150% DB) 1 33.33 20.00 14.29 10.00 5.00 3.750 2 44.45 32.00 24.29 18.00 9.50 7.219 ...
Metlock Corporation purchased an asset at a cost of $50,000 on March 1, 2020. The asset has a useful life of 8 years and a salvage value of $4,000. For tax purposes, the MACRS class life is 5 years. MACRS Depreciation Rates by Class of Property Recovery Year 3-year (200% DB) 5-year (200% DB) 7-year (200% DB) 10-year (200% DB) 15-year (150% DB) 20-year (150% DB) 1 33.33 20.00 14.29 10.00 5.00 3.750 2 44.45 32.00 24.29 18.00 9.50 7.219 ...
On April 5, 2019, Kinsey places in service a new passenger automobile that cost $60,000. The car is used 100% for business in each tax year. Kinsey uses the MACRS 200% declining-balance method of cost recovery (the auto is a 5-year asset). Assume Kinsey elects any available additional first-year depreciation. The maximum depreciation allowed for 2019 is $ 12000 X and for 2020 is S 16000 20 5 Hint(s) EXHIBIT 8.4 MACRS Accelerated Depreciation for Personal Property Assuming Half-Year Convention...
Nash Enterprises purchased a delivery truck on January 1, 2017, at a cost of $28,080. The truck has a useful life of 7 years with an estimated salvage value of $6,240. The straight-line method is used for book purposes. For tax purposes, the truck, having an MACRS class life of 7 years, is classified as 5-year property; the optional MACRS tax rate tables are used to compute depreciation. In addition, assume that for 2017 and 2018 the company has revenues...