Question

Can someone please help me write an introduction paragraph and summary of this article.

The New Bjork Times ECONOMIC VIEW Trumps Tariffs Havent Really Transformed Trade. Yet. By Justin Wolfers Nov. 21, 2018 President Trumps protectionist impulses have upended the global debate about international trade. But so far, his policies have barely changed a fundamental reality: The United States is still less protectionist than it has been throughout most of its history or than most nations are today Even if the tariffs currently in place inflict only limited damage on the economy,however, the consequences will be much more severe if Mr. Trump follows through on his threats to take much more aggressive action. Heres the big picture. The average tariffl rate in the United States was 1.4 percent, according to the latest data compiled by the United States International Trade Commission. That was nearly as low as it has ever been. But that figure only includes tariffs imposed in the administrations first year. A lot has happened since then. In March, the White House added a 25 percent tariff to about $31 billion worth of imported steel, and a 10 percent tariff to $17 billion of imported aluminum. (This does not apply to imports from Argentina, Australia and Brazil.) In July and August, Mr. Trump kicked off a trade war with China by imposing an extra 25 percent tariff on $50 billion worth of imports from the country. China retaliated, so Mr. Trump punched back, imposing an additional 10 percent tariff on $200 billion in Chinese goods I asked Chad Bown, a trade policy expert at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a Washington think tank where I also serve as a nonresident senior fellow, for a back-of-the- envelope calculation of how consequential these changes would be. He found that Mr. Trumps actions would increase Americas annual tariff revenue by about $42 billion. That sounds like a big number and it has garnered major headlines. But if you consider the scale of international trade, the figure starts to seem more modest: Last year, Americans spent roughly $2.3 trillion on imports.

These numbers suggest the average tariff rate in 2018 will rise by about 1.8 percentage points, to about 3.2 percent. This means that Mr. Trump has already rolled tariffs back to roughly their level at the beginning of President Bill Clintons administration. Even so, average tariffs remain lower -by quite a large margin-than they have been through most of United States history. Its worth putting this in a global context. Even after these recent tariff increases, the United States will charge lower tariffs on average than most countries, although it has become notably more protectionist than major trading partners like Canada and the European Union. Some historical perspective is useful here, too. The Smoot-Hawley tariffs of the 1930s as the actor and writer Ben Stein memorably reminded us in the 1986 movie Ferris Buellers Day Off -led the average tariff rate to rise as high as-anyone, anyone?-20 percent. Even that was an improvement compared with the early 1900s, when the tariff rate nearly hit 30 percent In March, the White House added a 25 percent tariff to about $31 billion worth of imported steel. Chinatopix, via Associated Press This broader perspective suggests that the United States remains, at least in broad brush strokes a low-tariff country This isnt an argument in favor of Mr. Trumps trade policy. Like most other economists, I generally favor freer trade, and these tariffs are moving us in the wrong direction. Imposing tariffs on China, only to see China retaliate with tariffs on the United States, is in the interest of neither country. It has caused disruption in both nations, and made neither better off.

Furthermore, fighting a trade war when tariffs around the world are already pretty low is ly pointless. Thats because if you win, you can force your trading partners to knock ething a bit closer to zero. their tariff rate down from a few percentage points above zero to som Thats not a big deal. But the major weapon used to fight a trade war is the threat of substantially higher tariffs, and negotiations become deadlocked, these higher tariffs can persist. The prize for winning a trade war is small, but the costs are potentially very large because of a troubling asymmetry comes into play that Economic theory provides a rule of thumb that the cost of tarif-induced distortions rises in the square of the tariff rate. Put simply, the idea is this: Small tariffs do relatively little harm. A tariff rate of 1 percent, for instance, probably wont prevent you from buying something you really want If, however, the tariff rate jumps to 10 percent, the cost of tariff-induced distortions wont just be 10 times as great. It will inflict 100 times the damage. Thats what makes large tarif increases so bad. They dont just lead to fewer imports. that they really value. They also persuade people to cut back even on stuff Under this logic, even if relatively small tariff increases havent imposed much pain, further escalation could have far more severe consequences. The administration has already announced plans to increase the second round of tariffs on China from 10 percent to 25 percent, starting in January. That would raise the average tariff rate to 4.5 percent. And Mr. Trump has threatened to broaden his tariff offensive, imposing a 25 percent tariff on all of the roughly $500 billion of goods and services imported from China. That would cause the average tariff rate to rise to about 7.2 percent. If the president follows through on his threat to impose a 25 percent tariff on auto-sector imports from any country, the average tariff rate for the entire economy would rise into double digits. Even worse, Mr. Trump has recently mused about withdrawing the United States from the World Trade Organization. If he were to do so, the United States would no longer be bound by past multilateral trade agreements that together determine nearly all American tariff rates. Then we would really be in trouble. If the United States were to withdraw from the trade organization, then an executive order could lead tariffs to revert to the much higher rates when they were last set by Congress as part of- anyone, anyone?- the Smoot-Hawley act Justin Wolfers is a professor of economics and public policy at the University of Michigan, Follow him on Twitter: @justinwolfers. A version of this article appears in print on Nov. 24, 2018, on Page BU8 of the New York edition with the headline: Trumps Tanits Havent

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

introduction-tariff as a trade barrier is no longer considered as a major trade barrier because most of the nations are following globalisation and liberalisation policies where they are keeping the tariff rate very low or near to zero. in situation like this the president of AMERICA mr. trump declairing a trde war against china by imposing heavy tariff on imports from china  is the talk of the town. two nations are putting tariff on each others import and no one is ready to backout. in a situation like this the revenue from tariff is definitly increasing but the broader picture shows something totally different here. the article talks about the trade war between these two nations and its consequences.

summary- in a globalisation and liberalisation era of trade united states and china have declired trade war against each other by increasing tariff rates. though the tariff rate of united states is not the highest in the history of america but the increase of tariff rate for perticularly china is definitly shows the bad relationship between the two nations. china also is retaliating with incease tariff on the import from america and the war is definitly not benefiting both the countries. due to tariff increase people are not only cutting down on there import but also sacrificing the things that they actually value a lot. the total welfare of both the nation is declining. now that the united states has declired to remove itself from the WTO agreement no one can now tell how far this war is going to go. a small increase in tariff is bearable for people but a huge increase like 25-30% will harm the peopls choice really badly and will make a big hole in there pocket. the trade war between two countries definitly going to harm the harmony of people in both the countries if not stopped here.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Can someone please help me write an introduction paragraph and summary of this article. The New...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • can someone please help me with an introduction paragraph and a summary of the whole article....

    can someone please help me with an introduction paragraph and a summary of the whole article. us. Trump Didn't Kill the Global Trade System. He Split It in Two. Allies find relations modestly tweaked despite the president's rhetoric, while relations with China are entering a deep freeze By Greg Ip Dec. 26, 2018 1136 am. ET When Donald Trump entered the White House on a platform of defiant nationalism nearly two years ago, many feared he would dismantle the global...

  • Hi cam you help me make a summary about this short article, and how it affects...

    Hi cam you help me make a summary about this short article, and how it affects me economically as US citizen? Trump Has Promised to Bring Jobs Back. His Tariffs Threaten to Send Them Away. By Peter S. Goodman Jan. 6, 2019 HOLLAND, Mich. — Plants in every direction shut down and moved their operations to Mexico, succumbing to the relentless pressure to cut costs in an age of globalization. Not EBW Electronics. As the decades passed, the family-owned business...

  • International business case study please help me to solve the case with sutable answers U.S. Tariffs...

    International business case study please help me to solve the case with sutable answers U.S. Tariffs on Tire Imports from China In September 2009, President Obama placed a tariff on tire imports from China. The tariff was a response to a rising tide of imports from China and intense lobbying from the United Steelworkers union, which represents 15,000 workers at 13 tire plants in the United States. Tires imported from China are usually low- end models that sell for half...

  • ​Which statement is true according to the article?

    The article that they are referring to is "The latest casualty of Trump's trade war with China?" Wine by: Margot RooseveltWhich statement is true according to the article? Choose one: A. Most wine consumed in China was imported from California, B. Chilean companies aim to improve their wine distribution in China. C. Only the United States has used tariffs in this trade dispute with China. D. Despite the tariffs, the volume of wine exports from the United States to China has increased slightly. What would be...

  • Hi can you help me make a summary about this short article and how it affects...

    Hi can you help me make a summary about this short article and how it affects me economically as US ciizen ? US-China Trade Talks Wrap Up After Extending To Third Day Facebook Twitter Flipboard Email January 9, 20196:39 AM ET Matthew S. Schwartz Twitter U.S. and Chinese envoys extended trade talks into a third day Wednesday after President Donald Trump said negotiations aimed at ending a tariff war were "going very well!" Oliver Zhang/AP After extending to an unexpected...

  • Can somebody to help with the following questions, I really appreciate with your help: 1) Write...

    Can somebody to help with the following questions, I really appreciate with your help: 1) Write a short summary of the article (2 paragraphs or more). 2) Do you agree or disagree with the author? 3) In your opinion, from the U.S. perspective, what actions should the U.S. take against nations with unfair trade practices? Free Trade Is a Two-Way Street The Trump administration last week celebrated the workers and businesses that make this country great. The purpose of "Made...

  • Can someone help me with this queshtion I do not understand it for anything. I been...

    Can someone help me with this queshtion I do not understand it for anything. I been struggling with 2 days and its really confusing. Its only one queshtion but has 2 parts I need to shift the curves in the graph and answer the question down but its really tricky. Can anyone help me. This was the only way I can post it. It starts from where it says IT STARTS HERE. NAFTA: Breaking Up Is Hard to Do Paul...

  • Hi can you help make a summary about this short article and how it affects me...

    Hi can you help make a summary about this short article and how it affects me economically as US citizen ? Federal spending outpaced revenue by $317 billion over the first three months of fiscal 2019, according to the Congressional Budget Office.CreditSarah Silbiger/The New York Times Image Federal spending outpaced revenue by $317 billion over the first three months of fiscal 2019, according to the Congressional Budget Office.CreditCreditSarah Silbiger/The New York Times By Jim Tankersley Jan. 8, 2019 WASHINGTON —...

  • Q General Motors in China In November 2018, General Motors, America's largest home-grown auto- mobile manufacturer,...

    Q General Motors in China In November 2018, General Motors, America's largest home-grown auto- mobile manufacturer, announced it would close three assembly plants in the United States, laying off about 5.600 employees. All of these plants made passenger cars that had fallen out of favor with U.S. consumers. who preferred to purchase sports util- ity vehicles and pick-up trucks. Jvdwort/123RF President Donald Trump, who has made the revival of traditional U.S. manufacturing industries one of his major goals, quickly tweeted...

  • Hi can you help me make a summary about this short article and how it could...

    Hi can you help me make a summary about this short article and how it could affect me economically as US citizen? Trump Pulls Back From Declaring a National Emergency to Fund a Wall Trump Says He’s Holding Off on National Emergency Declaration President Trump said it was up to Congress to break the impasse over a border wall that has led to a government shutdown.Published OnJan. 11, 2019CreditCreditSarah Silbiger/The New York Times By Annie Karni and Maggie Haberman Jan....

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT