Question

unfortunately, a common temptation is to let our own beliefs a d biases affect how we evaluate someone else's point of view. what are some ways we can approach and argument with an open mind? why is this important in an academic exercise?

Answer 1

Unfortunately, a common temptation is to let our own beliefs and biases affect how we evaluate someone else's point of view. what are some ways we can approach an argument with an open mind? Why is this important in an academic exercise?

Answer - We believe what we see and act based on our experiences with dealing with any argument or problems. Also at times we take lessons from our elders on how they have solved problems. We do not accept any advice from strangers or new person who we have met.

Sometimes it is necessary to pay attention to what others have to say and then analyse the situation and act accordingly.

Confirmation bias is our tendency to cherry-pick information that confirms our existing beliefs or ideas. Confirmation bias explains why two people with opposing views on a topic can see the same evidence and come away feeling validated by it. This cognitive bias is most pronounced in the case of ingrained, ideological, or emotionally charged views.

Failing to interpret information in an unbiased way can lead to serious misjudgments. By understanding this, we can learn to identify it in ourselves and others. We can be cautious of data that seems to immediately support our views.

The complexity of confirmation bias arises partly from the fact that it is impossible to overcome it without an awareness of the concept. Even when shown evidence to contradict a biased view, we may still interpret it in a manner that reinforces our current perspective.

Confirmation bias is one of the less-helpful heuristics which exists as a result. The information that we interpret is influenced by existing beliefs, meaning we are more likely to recall it. As a consequence, we tend to see more evidence that enforces our worldview. Confirmatory data is taken seriously, while disconfirming data is treated with skepticism. Our general assimilation of information is subject to deep bias.