Question

Question 2 Discuss the sources of criticism of the effectiveness of financial statement auditing and proposals that have been suggested in recent reviews as remedies to improve audit quality and the contribution of auditing to the financial reporting process. (50 marks)

Answer 1

Features of Financial Statements:

1. The Financial Statements should be relevant for the purpose for which they are prepared. Unnecessary and confusing disclosures should be avoided and all those that are relevant and material should be reported to the public.

2. They should convey full and accurate information about the performance, position, progress and prospects of an enterprise. It is also important that those who prepare and present the financial statements should not allow their personal prejudices to distort the facts.

3. They should be easily comparable with previous statements or with those of similar concerns or industry. Comparability increases the utility of financial statements.

4. They should be prepared in a classified form so that a better and meaningful analysis could be made.

5. The financial statements should be prepared and presented at the right time. Undue delay in their preparation would reduce the significance and utility of these statements.

6. The financial statements must have general acceptability and understanding. This can be achieved only by applying certain “generally accepted accounting principles” in their preparation.

7. The financial statements should not be affected by inconsistencies arising out of personal judgment and procedural choices exercised by the accountant.

The limitations of financial statements are those factors that a user should be aware of before relying on them to an excessive extent. Knowledge of these factors could result in a reduction of invested funds in a business, or actions taken to investigate further. The following are all limitations of financial statements:

1.Dependence on historical costs. Transactions are initially recorded at their cost. This is a concern when reviewing the balance sheet, where the values of assets and liabilities may change over time. Some items, such as marketable securities, are altered to match changes in their market values, but other items, such as fixed assets, do not change. Thus, the balance sheet could be misleading if a large part of the amount presented is based on historical costs.

2.Inflationary effects. If the inflation rate is relatively high, the amounts associated with assets and liabilities in the balance sheet will appear inordinately low, since they are not being adjusted for inflation. This mostly applies to long-term assets.

3.Intangible assets not recorded. Many intangible assets are not recorded as assets. Instead, any expenditures made to create an intangible asset are immediately charged to expense. This policy can drastically underestimate the value of a business, especially one that has spent a large amount to build up a brand image or to develop new products. It is a particular problem for startup companies that have created intellectual property, but which have so far generated minimal sales.

4.Based on specific time period. A user of financial statements can gain an incorrect view of the financial results or cash flows of a business by only looking at one reporting period. Any one period may vary from the normal operating results of a business, perhaps due to a sudden spike in sales or seasonality effects. It is better to view a large number of consecutive financial statements to gain a better view of ongoing results.

5.Not always comparable across companies. If a user wants to compare the results of different companies, their financial statements are not always comparable, because the entities use different accounting practices. These issues can be located by examining the disclosures that accompany the financial statements.

6.Subject to fraud. The management team of a company may deliberately skew the results presented. This situation can arise when there is undue pressure to report excellent results, such as when a bonus plan calls for payouts only if the reported sales level increases. One might suspect the presence of this issue when the reported results spike to a level exceeding the industry norm.

7.No discussion of non-financial issues. The financial statements do not address non-financial issues, such as the environmental attentiveness of a company's operations, or how well it works with the local community. A business reporting excellent financial results might be a failure in these other areas.

8.Not verified. If the financial statements have not been audited, this means that no one has examined the accounting policies, practices, and controls of the issuer to ensure that it has created accurate financial statements. An audit opinion that accompanies the financial statements is evidence of such a review.

9.No predictive value. The information in a set of financial statements provides information about either historical results or the financial status of a business as of a specific date. The statements do not necessarily provide any value in predicting what will happen in the future. For example, a business could report excellent results in one month, and no sales at all in the next month, because a contract on which it was relying has ended.

10.Financial statements are normally quite useful documents, but it can pay to be aware of the preceding issues before relying on them too much.