Question

Do the economic effect of immigration shape the political struggle over changes in immigration law? Or...

Do the economic effect of immigration shape the political struggle over changes in immigration law? Or do the politics of immigration reflect other type of cultural and social division with host countries?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Even as most Americans celebrate their heritage and identity as a “nation of immigrants”, there is deep ambivalence about future immigration. There is a strong base of support for continued immigration as a necessary ingredient for economic growth and as an essential element of a cosmopolitan society among many Americans. Almost 60 million people – more than one-fifth of the total population of the United States – are immigrants or the children of immigrants. For most of this community, immigration policy is not an abstract ideology but a means of family reunification and an affirmation that they are part of the “American dream”.

On the other side, there is a substantial share, perhaps a majority, of Americans who are opposed to a continuation of large-scale immigration. Many opponents of immigration are old-stock Americans who have all but forgotten their immigrant ancestors. They often live in small towns or in suburban areas, and many have relatively little contact with immigrant families in their neighborhoods, churches, and friendship networks. Beyond the debate over the economic consequences of immigration, there is also an emotional dimension that shapes sentiments toward immigration. Many Americans, like people everywhere, are more comfortable with the familiar than with change. They fear that newcomers with different languages, religions, and cultures are reluctant to assimilate into American society and to learn English.

Although many of the perceptions and fears of old-stock Americans about new immigrants are rooted in ignorance and prejudice, the fears of many Americans about the future are not entirely irrational. With globalization and massive industrial restructuring dominating many traditional sources of employment (both blue-collar and white-collar), many native-born citizens are fearful about their (and their children’s) future. The news media often cite examples of industries that seek out low-cost immigrant workers to replace native-born workers. Some sectors, such as harvesting vegetables and fruits in agriculture, have very few native-born Americans seeking jobs in them, but immigrants are also disproportionately employed in many other sectors, including meatpacking, construction, hospitals, and even in many areas of advanced study in research universities. These examples are fodder for unscrupulous political leaders who seek to exploit popular fears to their own ends.

While it is not possible to predict the role of immigration in America’s future, it is instructive to study the past. The current debates and hostility to immigrants echo throughout American history. What is most surprising is that almost all popular fears about immigration and even the judgments of “experts” about the negative impact of immigrants have been proven false by history. Not only have almost all immigrants (or their descendents) assimilated over time, but they have broadened American society in many positive ways. In this review, I discuss the popular fears about immigrants by old-stock Americans and the historical record of immigrant contributions to the evolution of the industrial economy, political reform, and even to the development of American culture.

A short overview of immigration

Immigration to North America began with Spanish settlers in the sixteenth century, and French and English settlers in the seventeenth century. In the century before the American Revolution, there was a major wave of free and indentured labor from England and other parts of Europe as well as large-scale importation of slaves from Africa and the Caribbean.

Although some level of immigration has been continuous throughout American history, there have been two epochal periods: the 1880 to 1924 age of mass migration, primarily from southern and eastern Europe, and the post-1965 wave of immigration, primarily from Latin America and Asia.1 Each of these eras added more than 25 million immigrants, and the current wave is far from finished. During some of the peak years of immigration in the early 1900s, about one million immigrants arrived annually, which was more than one percent of the total US population at the time. In the early twenty-first century, there have been a few years with more than one million legal immigrants, but with a total US population of almost 300 million, the relative impact is much less than it was in the early part of the twentieth century.

The first impact of immigration is demographic. The 70 million immigrants who have arrived since the founding of the republic (formal records have only been kept since 1820) are responsible for the majority of the contemporary American population.2 Most Americans have acquired a sense of historical continuity from America’s founding, but this is primarily the result of socialization and education, not descent. The one segment of the American population with the longest record of historical settlement are African Americans. Almost all African Americans are the descendants of seventeenth- or eighteenth-century arrivals.

Much of the historical debate over the consequences of immigration has focused on immigrant “origins” – where they came from. Early in the twentieth century, when immigration from southern and eastern Europe was at its peak, many old-stock Americans sought to preserve the traditional image of the country as primarily composed of descendants from northwest Europe, especially of English Protestant stock. The immigration restrictions of the 1920s were calibrated to preserving the historic “national origins” of the American population. The American population has, however, always been much more diverse than the “Anglo-centric” image of the eighteenth century. The first American census in 1790, shortly after the formation of the United States, counted a bit less than 4 million people, of whom at least 20 per cent were of African descent.6 There are no official figures on the numbers of American Indians prior to the late nineteenth century, but they were the dominant population of the eighteenth century in most of the territories that eventually became the United States. The estimates of the non-English-origin population in 1790 range from 20 to 40 per cent.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Do the economic effect of immigration shape the political struggle over changes in immigration law? Or...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Consider a study of doing business in Mexico. How do the economic, cultural, social, and political...

    Consider a study of doing business in Mexico. How do the economic, cultural, social, and political climates affect a business there? Describe Mexico’s form of government. How are business relations conducted there? Are they more or less formal than in other Western countries? Describe how Mexico’s policies toward trade and investment have changed over the years. Do you believe that Mexico provides a stable climate for trade and investment? What products or industries would seem to do well in the...

  • Discuss the kinds of economic, social, and political changes that have taken place in eastern European...

    Discuss the kinds of economic, social, and political changes that have taken place in eastern European countries since 1990.

  • How do the political, economic, cultural, and social factors impacting African Americans of the time influence...

    How do the political, economic, cultural, and social factors impacting African Americans of the time influence the competing philosophies of Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois as expressed in the “Atlanta Exposition Address” and “Of Mr. Booker T. and Others”?

  • Market Entry Plan: Political and Legal Environment Political stability is commonly related to the type of...

    Market Entry Plan: Political and Legal Environment Political stability is commonly related to the type of government and degree of corruption present in a country. In addition, a company may face various business regulations when conducting international business. In this module, your goal is to identify political and legal factors that could affect global business decisions. Based on the country (Turkey) you are analyzing for your global business enterprise, research information related to the following areas: 1) GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS...

  • This discussion explores the political and economic reforms in Myanmar that are changing the nation’s future....

    This discussion explores the political and economic reforms in Myanmar that are changing the nation’s future. For decades, Myanmar languished under a brutal military dictatorship. With its economy at a virtual standstill thanks to corruption and poor management, Myanmar, despite its wealth of natural resources, became one of the poorest countries in the world at a time when its neighbors were experiencing rapid economic growth. Sanctions by the United States and the European Union imposed in response to the corrupt...

  • Discussion Topics forestal Describe what you consider to be a current social, economic and/or political factor...

    Discussion Topics forestal Describe what you consider to be a current social, economic and/or political factor that might influence changes in nursing education and practice the way that Bas described such factors for the last millennium State your own opinion about the new BS in Ten law in New York state Your responses should reflect the reading and be substantial in both quality and quantity. There is no minimum number of words but in order to demonstrate understanding of this...

  • The value of a business changes over time because: the risk involved in operations do not...

    The value of a business changes over time because: the risk involved in operations do not change. the estimates reflect the timing of what economic, industry, and firm conditions are at the time of valuation. the impact of the business valuation is minimized when timed properly. the factors influencing the valuation can be controlled.

  • The social security system has been a topic of political debate for over 25 years. Various...

    The social security system has been a topic of political debate for over 25 years. Various positions have been taken on its ability to meet its objective of providing a minimum level of economic security for retiree's, the need for drastic changes in the system, and the possibility of allowing for alternative private funding arrangements for social security. This chapter discusses the mechanical process required to compute and collect the taxes that fund social security. Because the health and future...

  • 8:45 < Cultural Comparison Assignment (M. Grade Detail to do so Directions: A student will pick a...

    pick 3 civilizations and compare them 8:45 < Cultural Comparison Assignment (M. Grade Detail to do so Directions: A student will pick any three civilizations covered in this class. Students will compare and contrast al three civilizations in terms of the following: 1) Social and Cultural: Examine everyday activities social order, and classes within the culture. (Example: how were women represented and treated in each culture?) 2) Political and Economic: What were their political structures like? What were their economies...

  • Question 1 According to the crash course video on political parties, why do political scientist feel...

    Question 1 According to the crash course video on political parties, why do political scientist feel that the primary process can lead to further party polarization (parties becoming less moderate)? a. Low voter turnout leads to partisan voters which leads to partisan candidates b. Primaries are held at different times around the country c. Low voter turnout leads to only elites voting and they pick their favorite candidates d. Only moderate voters vote in primaries Question 2 According to your...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT