Question

   Harrison Products Inc. (HPI) is a global manufacturer of molded plastic products and metal products that are used in the auto industry, food and beverage industry (containers), and in a variety of other products and packaging materials. HPI has several manufacturing plant located world-wide, generally in locations convenient to the companys most significant customers. The present case considers one of HPIs products, a one gallon metal can container used for paint and other chemical products. The product is produced in two U.S. locations, Los Angeles, CA, and Youngstown, OH. These plants produce several milion of these cans each year. The competitive environment for HPI is challenging. Competitors in all parts of the world challenge HPI on cost which is the primary order-winning factor in the business. All HPI customers expect very high quality and prompt service, so competition on price and reliability in meeting delivery dates are critical to its competitive success Operating Data and Strategy HPI has focused its production of the one gallon metal cans in the two plants, in Los Angeles and Youngstown, Ohio. The summary information in Exhibit 1 shows the plant capacity, normal production, price and cost information. Currently, management believes that production costs are driven by volume; managements goal meet competitive cost pressures by increasing volume and improving efficiency to bring costs down. For this reason, product costs are based on volume, as illustrated in Exhibit 1. The unit cost for the Los Angeles plant is $1.10, while the unit cost in the Youngstown plant is $1.00. The cost difference reflects the higher facilities cost at the Los Angeles plant, which is the newer of the two plants. The Los Angeles plant has similar equipment and manufacturing flow design to that of the Youngstown plant, but a key difference is that the Los Angeles plant was designed to be more efficient for smaller job (batch) sizes; the equipment and plant lay-out are consistent with greater speed in processing smaller jobs. The decision to design the Los Angeles plant in this way reflected the smaller orders that were generally received by the Los Angeles plant. See Exhibit 2 for a sample of the some of the jobs at the two plants, the exhibit shows a representative sample of 28 jobs for Los Angles and 41 jobs at the Youngstown plant, showing the quantity in each job (job size) and the estimated minutes per 1,000 units for that job The number of minutes per 1,000 units is a commonly-used measure of job performance at HPI and is called runtime Product Costs HPI includes manufacturing costs into three main categories. First, there is materials cost that includes the metal and other materials necessary in the production of the cans. These materials are considered direct materials and are S0.40 per unit at each of HFIs plants. The second category is operating costs which include labor, supervision, some materials used in machine maintenance and repair, materials receiving and stocking, and related costs. Labor osts include runtime labor, setup labor and downtime labor. Operations costs are considered indirect costs and the costing method used is to apply these costs to product based on units of output, as noted above. The two plants have the same per unit operating cost of $0.50 The third category, facilities costs, includes equipment and the plant facility. Because Los Angeles is the newer plant, these costs are higher for Los Angeles, at $0.20 per unit relative to the Youngstown plant, where the facilities cost is $0.10 per unit Required 1. Using the companys current costing system, calculate the manufacturing cost and operating margin (price less manufacturing cost) for each of the jobs in Exhibit 2, for both the Los Angeles and Youngstown plants. Assume that 20% of operating costs are due to setup costs and that the remainder are runtime costs. considering an activity-based approach which would apply setup costs to each job; each job would be applied the same amount of setup cost. Calculate the manufacturing cost and operating margin for each o the jobs in Exhibit 2, for both the Los Angeles and Youngstown plants. 2. HFI is

3. Assume as above that 20% of operating costs are due to setup costs and that the remainder are runtime costs. Now, assume that HFI is considering an activity-based approach which would recognize that each setup requires time and material that is partly proportional to the size of the prior job. That is, the part of setup that involves clean-up and preparation of the machine for a new job is longer after a relatively long job than it is for setups that follow a relatively short job. HFI now plans to apply setup costs so that one half of the setup costs would be applied equally to each job and the remainder of setup costs would be applied based on the number of units in the job. Calculate the manufacturing cost and operating margin for each of the jobs in Exhibit 2, for both the Los Angeles and Youngstown plants Interpret briefly your findings in parts 1,2 and 3 above. Do you support the setup cost application approach in (3) above? Why or why not? Using analysis based on charts, correlation or regression analysis or other means, study (a) the relationship between runtime and job size at both plants, and (b) examine how this relationship differs between the two plants. What are the implications of these relationships, and how they differ between plants, on (a) product costing, and (b) manufacturing strategy? 6 4. 0 What approach do you think would be preferable? 5.

Exhibit 1 Current Operating Data for HPI Price Materials cost/unit Annual Overhead Budget 1.40 $ 0.40 1.40 0.40 Operations (Runtime and setup) Facilities Annual normal production units Annual number of jobs Plant Capacity (units/year), approx 30,000,000 12,000,000 60,000,000 2,000 100,000,000 50,000,000 10,000,000 100,000,000 1,500 125,000,000 Product Costs Materials Cost/unit Operations Cost/unit Facilities Cost/unit 0.400 0.500 0.200 1.100 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.100 1.000 0.400 Operating margin/unit $18,000,000 $ 40,000,000 32,000,000 8,000,000 Total operating margin General, Selling, and Adm. Costs Before-Tax income 16,000,000 2,000,000

Exhibit 2A Sample Job Data for the Los Angeles Plant Harrison Products: Los Angeles Plant Job Number Job Size Minuntes/1000 3.666 3.860 4.063 3.879 4.188 2.095 2.223 3.118 2.140 2.490 2.960 2.969 2.651 11,342 7,089 2,835 7,563 1,891 70,884 63,087 25,282 68,285 49,147 30,244 30,008 41,822 9,452 13,941 12,051 119,086 5,907 75,610 1,182 3,308 37,805 64,269 35,168 16,970 12,524 43,807 21,738 8 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 3.551 3.649 1.999 3.961 2.028 4.365 4.081 2.755 2.200 2.827 3.433 3.607 2.649 3.243 23 24 25 26 27 28

Exhibit 2B: Sample Data for the Youngstown Plant Harrison Products: Youngstown Plant ob Number Job Size Minutes/1000 6,695 116,959 136,058 42,531 51,884 10,387 69,496 51,982 79,351 18,594 63,796 48,241 13,980 97,220 84,175 41,153 9,796 98,874 22,447 142,458 63,796 120,700 80,877 149,841 8,763 30,885 43,712 12,160 100,912 52,376 129,462 161,262 5,317 15,752 14,177 28,354 29,535 6,895 3,467 73,444 190,600 9.025 2.235 2.224 3.042 2.653 6.418 3.139 2.806 2.824 4.224 2.804 3.024 5.502 3.181 2.517 3.143 7.007 2.627 3.927 2.704 2.648 2.264 2.824 2.405 7.230 4.927 2.884 5.891 2.345 2.943 2.223 2.169 10.743 5.070 5.286 3.690 4.414 8.902 15.800 2.975 2.280 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 21 23 26 28 29 31 32 34 35 36 37 38 41

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

ANSWER: 1.Los Angeles ob No. ob Size aterials lOp.costs Facilities costTotal costs Price gin 2268.4 402.6 11342 7089 2835 536.8 5671 12476.215878.8 2835.63544.5 1417.8 2126.7 850.5 8319.310588.2 2268.9 7797.9 924.6 1134417.5 567 3118.5 969 7563 025.2 37815 1512.6 1891 756.4 945.5 78.2 2080.1 2647.4 567.3 70884 28353.6 35442 14176.8 77972.4 237.6 21265.2 3087 25234.8 31543.5 12617.4 9395.7 88321.8 18926.1 25282 10112.812641 5056.4 27810.235394.8 7584.68285 2731434142.5 13657 75113.5[95599 20485.5 10 9147 19658.824573.5 9829.4 2097.6 15122 12003.2 15004 16728.820911 8364.4 54061.768805.8 14744.1 30244 48.8 3268.4 42341.6 73.2 12 30008 33008.8 42011.2 13 1822 6004.2 58550.8 12546.6 14 452 3780.84726 1890.4 10397.213232.8 2835.6 15 13941 5576.4 6970.5 2788.2 15335.119517.4 182.3 16 12051 820.4 6025.5 2410.2 13256.116871.4 615.3 17 119086 7634.4 59543 23817.2 130994.6 166720.4 35725.8 18 19 20 5907 75610 1182 97.7 8269.8 105854 1654.8 1772.1 22683 54.6 2362.8 2953.5 1181.4 30244 37805 15122 83171 1300.2 72.8591 236.4308 1323.2 1654 3638.8 631.2 11341.5 70695.9 89976.6 19280.7 38684.8 49235.2 10550.4 37805 1512218902.5 7561 1585.552927 4269 5168 6970 12524 3807 21738 25707.6 32134.5 12853.8 24 14067.217584 7033.6 1866723758 7888485 009.6 6262 2504.8 17522.821903.5 8761.4 8695.210869 4347.6 352918.8 441148.5176459.4 970526.7 1235216 264689.1 394 5091 757.2 8187.761329.8 13142.1 521.4 26 13776.417533.6 28 23911.830433.2 OTAL 882297 Operating Margin is positive for all jobs in this type of allocation of costs3151.06 3151.06 3151.06 3151.06 3151.06 3151.06 3151.06 3151.06 3151.06 3151.06 3151.06 3151.06 3151.06 3151.06 2425.34 1669.34 483.34 11970.94 14067.2 17218.26 8160.66 20673.86 11846.26 14371.74 2 888229.68 352918.8 41148.5 264689.1 orkings 88229.7/28= Operating Margin is negative for smaler batch lobsに7000 units) in this type of allocation of costs 3151.06 3. One-half of 20% divided equally & the other half proportionate to units perating Costs ne-half Other Runtime [Total qual gin costs@0.410p.costs 1575.53 567.1 1575.53 354.45 2835.6 4765.58 905.62 1575.53 141.75 1134 1575.53 378.15 3025.2 4978.88 1071.52 1575.53 94.55 756.4 1575.53 3544.2 28353.6 33473.3323233.87 1575.53 3154.35 |25234.8 29964.6820504.92 1575.53 1264.1 10112.8 12952.437273.17 1575.53 3414.25 27314 32303.7822324.22 1575.53 2457.35 19658.8 23691.6815625.92 536.8 679.43 394.17 851.28 -583.28 426.48 913.681575.53 1512.2 12097.6 15185.339009.87 1575.53 1500.4 12003.2 15079.138927.27 1575.53 2091.116728.8 20395.43 13062.17 1575.53 472.63780.8 5828.93 1732.67 1575.53 697.05 5576.4 7848.98 3303.82 1575.53 602.55 4820.4 6998.48 2642.32 1575.53 5954.3 47634.4 55164.2340104.57 1575.53 295.35 2362.8 4233.68 491.92 1575-533780.5 30244 3 1575.53 59.1 1575.53 165.4 1323.2 3064.13417.73 1575.53 1890.25 15122 18587.7811656.22 5600.0324887.97 107.43 -1161.83

1575.53 3213.4525707.6 30496.5820918.62 1575.53 1758.4 14067.2 17401.1310733.27 1513 818.5/ 12.03 433 1575.53626.2 5009.6 7211.33 2807.87 1575.53 2190.35 17522.8 21288.6813756.92 1575.531086.9 8695.2 11357.636032.77 44114.8444114.85352918.8 441148.5264689.1 Workings 485 67889212.03 1363.97 20% * 441148.5 1/2 applied equally to all jobs irrespective of size 4114.85/28 - 1575.53 Bal.1/2-44114.85 in proportion to no of units taking 882297 as the total no.of units 88229.7 Operating Margin is negative for smaller batch obs 3000 units) in this type of allocation of costs

Summary of Operating Margin perating argin(1.40.- argin(20% ual to all jobs) other 1/2 varies with output argin(12 0f 20% equal & ob No. Tob Size 1.10)-0.30/unit 11342 089 835 563 1891 0884 3087 402.6 2126.7 850.5 2268.9 567.3 21265.2 18926.1 1385.74 315.46 2017.06 125.86 2394.66 25202.54 22083.74 2394.17 05.62 583.28 1071.52 913.68 23233.87 20504.92 5282 7584.6 961.74 7273.1720485.5 24162.94 16507.74 8946.54 8852.14 13577.74 14744.1 2 12 13 12546.6 4 2425.34 1669.34 5 15 2 1E+05 483.34 788.26 8 2 3 3 11970.94 22556.54 14371.7409496 2T/98.4 34748 砂49.6砂490 9T294A2YY98A. 198.2 51982 72774.8 20792.8 1982 20792.8 25991 3 1A0A 3%015.51)3.13 111001.4 1A0

7 9391 58 82 7 2 5 7 1 01 71 1 48 16 3 1 - 0 1 2 5 3 3 1 5 7 3 3 948 6831677 3 5 3 8 8488 38006 9523 5 2 96582 5278011341.6 11814 166.73 166.73 166.73 166.73 166.73 166.73 252835.9 758 1386.8 9377.6 6240 1011346 17508.33 17980.73 8924.73 7553.53 35544.33 82406.73 1264182 8010.27 8600.77 2719.23 433.23 30555.27 89133.27 1011346 orkings otal Op costs 252836/41- 166.73 perating Margin is negative for job size even uptill 12000 under this ocationOne-half of 20% divided equally & the other half roportionate to units ating Costs One-half lOther Runtime otal gin qual costs@0.4 costs 3083.37 334.75 2678 3083.37 6847.95 46783.6 3083.37 6802.9 54423.2 3083.37 2126.55 17012.4 3083.37 2594.2 20753.6 3083.37 619.35 4154.8 3083.37 3474.8 27798.4 3083.37 599.1 20792.8 3083.37 3967.55 31740.4 3083.37 929.7 7437.6 3083.37 189.8 25518.4 3083.37 2412.05 19296.4 3083.37 699 3083.37 4861 38888 3083.37 4208.75 33670 96.12 55714.92 49548.18 4309.47 58142.73 22222.32 16055.58 26431.17 20264.43 7757.52 1590.78 34356.57 28189.83 26475.27 20308.53 38791.32 32624.58 11450.67 5283.93 31791.57 25624.83 24791.82 18625.08 70.62 374.37 6832.37 40665.63 0962.12 34795.38 5592 3207.633083.37 3672.2 29377.6 3083.37 9530 76240 126418.2[126418.21011346 Workings 36133.1729966.43 88853.37 82686.63 12641821011346 20% * 1264182 1/2 applied equally to all jobs irrespective of size 252836.4/2- 126418.2/413083.37 252836.4 126418.2 al 1/2-126418.2 in proportion to no.of units taking 2528364 as the total no of units Operating Margin is negative for job size 6700 & below under this allocation Summary of the Operating Margins Sample Data for the Youngstown Plant

perating argin(20% ual to all jobs) other 1/2 varies with output argin(1.2 0f 20% equal & ob No. Job Size Margin(1.40- 1.00)-0.40/unit 95 2678 116959 46783.6 136058 54423.2 2531 17012.4 51884 20753.6 10387 4154.8 69496 27798.4 51982 20792.8 79351 31740.4 18594 7437.6 3796 25518.4 8241 19296.4 2819.23 70.62 9548.18 58142.73 16055.58 20264.43 1590.78 28189.83 20308.53 32624.58 5283.93 25624.83 18625.08 3207.63 0665.63 34795.38 15435.48 1324.83 1862.27 15098.77 973.23 28581.27 19824.27 33508.77 3130.27 10 12 13 17953.77 13980 5592 823.27 7220 38888 2443.27 35920.77 14409.77 1268.73 3270.27 15 84175 33670 1153 16461.2 9796 3918.4 18 19 20 8874 39549.6 22447 8978.8 142458 56983.2 1409.93 5056.77 7017.78 5062.27 1022.7325731.27 54183.27 34271.77 3796 25518.4 120700 48280 80877 32350.8 149841 59936.4 8763 3505.2 30885 12354 25624.83 51231.63 3311.28 23 24 8753.77 1785.23 275.77 15689.27 86.73 4289.27 20021.27 58564.27 74464.27 3508.23 1709.27 345.08 859.98 26 3712 17484.8 12160 4864 100912 40364.8 52376 20950.4 129462 51784.8 161262 64504.8 5317 2126.8 15752 6300. 10814.88 16587.03 2388.63 2327.03 20485.83 55174.53 9484.53 690.72 005.03 28 29 30 32 3435 36 37 38 39 14177 5670. 28354 11341.6 29535 11814 8952758 3467 1386.8 73444 29377.6 190600 76240 2528364 1011346 21.77 8010.27 8600.77 2719.23 433.23 30555.27 3296.28 675.93 10207.38 19.38 1523.22 29966.43 1011346 1011346 e larger the job size, the greater the margin e 3rd type of allocation enhances the profit levels d reduces the loss element

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
    Harrison Products Inc. (HPI) is a global manufacturer of molded plastic products and metal products that...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • all one question just matching!!! thank you!!! itll help a lot especially since i dont have...

    all one question just matching!!! thank you!!! itll help a lot especially since i dont have enough funds for the book!!! Manufacturing overhead allocated is less than the actual manufacturing overhead Debited for the amount of indirect materials requisitioned for jobs Account debited when raw materials are purchased 1 Process costing 2 Job costing DODDODD Used to accumulate direct materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead allocated to a job 3. Job cost record Records the time spent by each employee...

  • (20 marks) EBY Metal Products reported the following components in its manufacturing costs for April 29...

    (20 marks) EBY Metal Products reported the following components in its manufacturing costs for April 29 (in thousands): 2. Direct costs Direct materials Direct manufacturing labor salaries Subcontracting 430 (TL) 110 Manufacturing overhead: 40 Fringe benefits on direct manufacturing labor Production setup Other manufacturing overhead 240 Please note that Subcontracting Costs are treated as a direct cost item separate from direct materials Compute (a) prime costs and (b) the conversion costs of EBY Metal Products using the cost classifications described...

  • Lurvey, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic products, reports the following manufacturing costs and account analysis classification...

    Lurvey, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic products, reports the following manufacturing costs and account analysis classification for the year ended December 31, 2017. E: (Click the icon to see the account information.) Lurvey, Inc., produced 80,000 units of product in 2017. Lurvey's management is estimating costs for 2018 on the basis of 2017 numbers. The following additional information is available for 2018. (Click the icon to see the additional information.) Read the requirements. 2017 2018 Variable unit Total cost X...

  • (0.4) Gower, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic products, reports the following manufacturing costs and account analysis...

    (0.4) Gower, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic products, reports the following manufacturing costs and account analysis classification for the year ended December 31, 2012. Account Classification Amount Direct materials All variable $300,000 Direct manufacturing labor All variable 225,000 Power All variable 37,500 Supervision labor 20% variable 56,250 Materials-handling labor 50% variable 60,000 Maintenance labor 40% variable 75,000 Depreciation 0% variable 95,000 Rent, property taxes, and administration 0% variable 100,000 Gower, Inc., produced 75,000 units of product in 2012. Gower's management...

  • Morin, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic products, reports the following manufacturing costs and account analysis classification...

    Morin, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic products, reports the following manufacturing costs and account analysis classification for the year ended December 31, 2017. Morin, Inc., produced 72500 units of product in 2017. Morin's management is estimating costs for 2018 on the basis of 2017 numbers. The following additional information is available for 2018. REQUIREMENTS Data Table Account Classification Amount Direct materials All variable $ 326,250 Direct manufacturing labor All variable 217,500 Power All variable 54,375 Supervision labor 72,500 15% variable...

  • Match each term with the explanation. Averages manufacturing costs across all units produced so that each...

    Match each term with the explanation. Averages manufacturing costs across all units produced so that each identical unit bears the same cost Process of dividing the total manufacturing overhead among the jobs produced during the year Used to accumulate direct materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead allocated to a job Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate multiplied by actual amount of allocation base used by job Account credited when recording the use of direct labor on jobs Account credited when finished goods...

  • Pittsburgh Plastics Corporation manufactures a variety of plastic products including a series of molded chairs. The...

    Pittsburgh Plastics Corporation manufactures a variety of plastic products including a series of molded chairs. The three models of molded chairs, which are all variations of the same design, are Standard (can be stacked), Deluxe (with arms), and Executive (With arms and padding). The company uses batch manufacturing and has an operation costing system. The production process includes an extrusion opertaion and subsequent operations to form, trim and finish the chairs. Plastic sheets are produced by the extrusion operation, some...

  • Benoit, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic products, reports the following manufacturing costs and account analysis classification...

    Benoit, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic products, reports the following manufacturing costs and account analysis classification for the year ended December 31, 2017 Click the icon to see the account classification.) Account classification Account Direct materials Direct manufacturing labour Power Supervision labour Materials-handling labour Maintenance labour Depreciation Rent, property taxes, and administration Classification Amount All variable $ 320,000 All variable 240,000 All variable 40,000 20% variable 68,000 40% variable 60,000 45% variable 80,000 0% variable 90,000 0% variable 125,000 Benoit,...

  • Benoit, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic products, reports the following manufacturing costs and account analysis classification...

    Benoit, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic products, reports the following manufacturing costs and account analysis classification for the year ended December 31, 2017 Click the icon to see the account classification.) Account classification Account Direct materials Direct manufacturing labour Power Supervision labour Materials-handling labour Maintenance labour Depreciation Rent, property taxes, and administration Classification Amount All variable $ 320,000 All variable 240,000 All variable 40,000 20% variable 68,000 40% variable 60,000 45% variable 80,000 0% variable 90,000 0% variable 125,000 Benoit,...

  • Harrison Company makes two products and uses a conventional costing system in which a single plantwide,...

    Harrison Company makes two products and uses a conventional costing system in which a single plantwide, predetermined overhead rate is computed based on direct labour-hours. Data for the two products for the upcoming year follow: Rascon 5 29.60 $ 14.70 70 29,000 Parcel $ 23.00 $ 4.20 Direct materials cost per unit Direct labour cost per unit Direct labour-hours per unit Number of units produced 40 120.000 These products are customized to some degree for specific customers. Required: 1. The...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT