Question

1-3

QUESTION 1 Corporate social responsibility advocates argue that ethical guidance for corporate managers may come from: corporate cultures that hold high concern for leading with fear. O corporate or industry codes of conduct. O corporations giving preference to their employees over other constituencies. corporations promoting avoidance behavior among employees. QUESTION 2 Which of the following scenarios best exemplifies groupthink? Ten officers of Jekyll Inc. are planning a business enterprise they know to be highly profitable. Six know the plan to be illegal. Nevertheless, they do not voice their concerns, but go along with the team's plan. Four officers of Bisk Corp. devise a highly profitable plan. David, a manager, points out to the group that the plan will likely get the company a high amount of negative publicity. David states that he will not sanction the team's plan. Ned. Oliver, and Phoebe draft plans for a new software company. They have all thoroughly researched their plans and no one has any criticisms or concerns. Barry, Ralph, and Ann'are subordinates of a firm who report problems to their top managers without any fear, QUESTION 3 The dormant Commerce Clause limits the authorty of the states to interfere with the flow of Interstate commerce by limiting the states from furthering only state interests limiting a state's ability to tax vendors. U prohibiting state legislation that unduly burdens intrastate commerce. prohibiting state laws that openly discriminate against interstate commerce.

Answer 1

Part 1

Answer is option B

B. corporate or industry codes of conduct

According to them there are three sources:

- values that are accepted widely

- corporate or industry codes of conduct

- constituency values.

Part 2

Answer is option D

D. Barry, Ralph, and Ann are subordinates of a firm who report problems to their top managers without any fear.

Groupthink refers to a situation whereby leaders’ opinions are evaluated and questioned fearlessly.

Part 3

Anser is option D

D. prohibiting state laws that openly discriminate against interstate commerce

It is done in to ways which are as follows:

prohibits discrimination targeting at interstate commerce

and

prohibits state legislation unnecessarily burdening interstate commerce.