Discuss the effectiveness of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) as an economic development measurement tool. In your answer outline other economic development measurement methods and discuss why or why not you consider these to be more effective. Use examples where appropriate.
PPP is highly inefficient as it directly proposes functional relationships between purchasing power of currency of two countries and their subsequent exchange rates. It also asusmes that we deal with similar cohort of commodities, free trade and absence of exchange of control.
Other economic development tools like GNP per capita and Human development index are more effective and efficient largely as it gives true picture and reflects the quality of life. GnP per capita truly depicts economic activity by person and shows how each individuals contributed towards economic development. Similarly HDi depicts life Expectancy which is sign of economic development.
Discuss the effectiveness of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) as an economic development measurement tool. In your...
Explain the theory of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). Discuss the validity of PPP using any empirical evidence you are aware of. (in 1500 words)
Explain the theory of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). Discuss the validity of PPP using any empirical evidence you are aware of. (in 1500 words)
Respond with your thoughts 150 words Personally, I do not agree with the statement that purchasing power parity (PPP) and interest rate parity (IRP) are without any problems. Purchasing power parity, though I do agree that it may be a useful method for comparing the market environments of different nations, has several imperfections. First and foremost, it is difficult to accurately assess the true value of goods across the globe. Granted, this may be the reasoning behind the so called...
Please define purchasing power parity (PPP) and the reason why a good or service should cost about the same in one economy as in another. Does it seem like the law of one price in a perfectly competitive market? How do you think PPP is related to the theory of comparative advantage? Thanks.
QUESTION 9 The differences between purchasing power parity (PPP) and covered interest rate parity (CIRP) include: PPP has less of an fx effect (movement) since it is a one way transaction whereas CIRP involves "round-trip" (forward/futures and spot) market transactions PPP is easier to achieve since it does not rely on future transactions CIRP drives both goods and financial markets closer to parity whereas PPP only affects goods markets CIRP is easier to achieve since it relies on high fungible...
Respond to this post with 150 on your thoughts Fortunately, the theories of both purchasing power parity and interest rate parity do not have any problems. Do you agree with this statement? The statement for this week’s forum I don’t agree with at all. My first thought upon reading the statement was that there is nothing that does not experience a problem at some sort, and when it comes to the economy this is very true. The theories of purchasing...
Should Caribbean countries focus their economic development agenda on achieving economic growth or economic development? Give reasons for your answer. Areas to be covered: Your response should define economic development and economic growth Use examples to show why you have chosen one over the other
These questions refer to Purchasing Power Parity. According to Interest Rate Parity, how would the dollar respond (appreciate, depreciate, no change) against the Euro in reaction to an average European inflation rate of 2.2%? The US inflation rate is 4% in this example—the term in question is 1 year. Please use this data for a and b and c. A. Consider the relationship between expansionary monetary policy. the value of the dollar, and net imports. How does this new dollar...
8. Purchasing-power parity Using data from The Economist's Big Mac Index for 2016, the following table shows the local currency price of a Big Mac in several countries as well as the actual exchange rate between each country and the United States. At the time of the data collection, a Big Mac would have cost you $4.93 in the United States and GBP 2.89 in the United Kingdom. The actual exchange rate between the British pound and the U.S. dollar...
6. Purchasing power parity Using data from The Economist's Big Mac Index for 2011, the following table shows the local currency price of a Big Mac in several countries as well as the actual exchange rate between each country and the United States. At the time of the data collection, a Big Mac would have cost you $4.07 in the United States and GBP 2.39 in the United Kingdom. The actual exchange rate between the British pound and the U.S. dollar...