Question

Let X_{1},X_{2},...,X_{n} be n independent random variables, where X_{i}~Poi(ix), 2 Is sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i} sufficient for lambda?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Here, X_{i}sim Poi(ilambda)Rightarrow f(x_{i})=rac{(ilambda)^{x_{i}}e^{-ilambda}}{x_{i}!}

So, n(n1) X)

So,f (t)

Now, Joint PDF of X1,X2,.....,Xn is given by:

Ti-i 「に12.1 !

This can be written as:

f(x_{1},x_{2},....,x_{n})=rac{prod_{i=1}^{n}i^{x_{i}}lambda^{t}e^{rac{n(n+1)}{2}lambda}}{prod_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}!} imes rac{t!(rac{n(n+1)}{2}lambda)^{t}}{t!(rac{n(n+1)}{2}lambda)^{t}}

f(t).HTI,r2 n where H(x1,r2,...., In) is independent of lambda

Thus, by Fisher Neyman criteria, T=sum X_{i} is sufficient for lambda.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Let be independent random variables, where ~, Is sufficient for ? We were unable to transcribe...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT