Krispy Kreme Doughnut, Inc. sells donuts through its network of stores owned and operated by independent franchisees. Franchisees criticized Krispy Kreme’s former CEO Scott Livengood for forcing companies with which Krispy Kreme did business to contribute $500,000 to sponsor a “storytelling festival” in the hometown of Mr. Livengood's wife. According to an independent investigation, this expenditure benefited Mr. Livengood and his wife, but did not benefit provide Krispy Kreme with any marketing or promotional benefits.
1. Was Mr. Livengood’s insistence that these companies fund the storytelling festival ethical?
2. Did Mr. Livengood likely have an improper tax motivation for structuring the funding of the storytelling festival in this manner?
1) Mr. Livengood's insistence that these companies fund the storytelling festival is unethical. because he is indirectly using the company funds for his personal benefits. but in the investigation report doesn't mention any financial benefits he is getting from this even. so until proving the financial benefits to Mr. Livengood, it's not considered as unethical.
2). No, He can't avail of any tax benefits by doing this event, because all the expenses paid by the company and Mr. Livengood is not currently working as the CEO of this company.
Krispy Kreme Doughnut, Inc. sells donuts through its network of stores owned and operated by independent...
Krispy Kreme Doughnut, Inc. sells donuts through its network of stores owned and operated by independent franchisees. Franchisees criticized Krispy Kreme’s former CEO, Scott Livengood, for forcing companies with which Krispy Kreme did business to contribute $500,000 to sponsor a “storytelling festival” in the hometown of Mr. Livengood’s wife. According to an independent investigation, this expenditure benefited Mr. Livengood and his wife, but did not provide Krispy Kreme with any marketing or promotional benefits. a. Was Mr. Livengood’s insistence that...