Hi. If you have any doubts relating to the above solution feel free to rise your doubts through comments. Thank You.
Problem 5-24 (LO 5-7) Check my work On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan...
Problem 5-24 (LO 5-7) On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $210,000 In cash. The equipment had originally cost $189,000 but had a book value of only $115,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $310,000 In net Income in 2018 (not including any Investment Income) while Brannlgan reported $101,300. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition date fair value...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $190,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $171,000 but had a book value of only $104,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $470,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $154,100. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $310,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $279,000 but had a book value of only $170,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $410,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $134,300. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $250,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $225,000 but had a book value of only $137,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $350,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $114,500. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology,...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $270,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $243,000 but had a book value of only $148,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $370,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $121,100. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $340,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $306,000 but had a book value of only $187,000 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $440,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $144,200. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $280,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $252,000 but had a book value of only $154,000 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $380,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $124,400. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $190,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $171,000 but had a book value of only $104,500 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $470,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $154,100. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $120,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $108,000 but had a book value of only $66,000 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $540,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $177,200. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...
On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $360,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $324,000 but had a book value of only $198,000 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $460,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $150,800. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan's unpatented technology, which...