In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays $2,750,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on it. It plans to demolish Building 1 and build a new store in its place. Building 2 will be a company office; it is appraised at $690,000, with a useful life of 20 years and a $75,000 salvage value. A lighted parking lot near Building 1 has improvements (Land Improvements 1) valued at $540,000 that are expected to last another 18 years with no salvage value. Without the buildings and improvements, the tract of land is valued at $1,770,000. The company also incurs the following additional costs: Cost to demolish Building 1 $ 341,400 Cost of additional land grading 191,400 Cost to construct new building (Building 3), having a useful life of 25 years and a $400,000 salvage value 2,242,000 Cost of new land improvements (Land Improvements 2) near Building 2 having a 20-year useful life and no salvage value 173,000 Required: 1. Allocate the costs incurred by Mitzu to the appropriate columns and total each column. 2. Prepare a single journal entry to record all the incurred costs assuming they are paid in cash on January 1, 2017. 3. Using the straight-line method, prepare the December 31 adjusting entries to record depreciation for the 12 months of 2017 when these assets were in use.
SOLUTION
1. Allocation of costs:
Allocation of purchase price | Appraised Value ($) | Percent of Total Appraised Value (A) | Total cost of acquisition ($) (B) | Apportioned cost ($) (A*B) |
Land | 1,770,000 | 59% | 2,750,000 | 1,622,500 |
Building 2 | 690,000 | 23% | 2,750,000 | 632,500 |
Land Improvements 1 | 540,000 | 18% | 2,750,000 | 495,000 |
Total | 3,000,000 | 100% | 2,750,000 |
Land | Building 2 | Building 3 | Land Improvements 1 | Land Improvements 2 | |
Purchase price | 1,622,500 | 632,500 | 495,000 | ||
Demolition | 341,400 | ||||
Land grading | 191,400 | ||||
New building (construction cost) | 2,242,000 | ||||
New improvements | 173,000 | ||||
Total | 2,155,300 | 632,500 | 2,242,000 | 495,000 | 173,000 |
2. Journal entry:
Date | Account Titles and Explanations | Debit ($) | Credit ($) |
January 1, 2017 | Land | 2,155,300 | |
Land Improvements 1 | 495,000 | ||
Land Improvements 2 | 173,000 | ||
Building 2 | 632,500 | ||
Building 3 | 2,242,000 | ||
Cash | 5,697,800 | ||
(To record cost of plant assets paid in cash) |
3.
Date | Account Titles and Explanations | Debit ($) | Credit ($) |
Dec.31,2017 | Depreciation expense | 137,705 | |
Accumulated depreciation-Land improvement 1 | 27,500 | ||
Accumulated depreciation-Land improvement 2 | 8,650 | ||
Accumulated depreciation-Building 2 | 27,875 | ||
Accumulated depreciation-Building 3 | 73,680 | ||
(To record depreciation expense for 2017) |
Accumulated depreciation-Land improvement 1 = 495,000/ 18 years = 27,500
Accumulated depreciation-Land improvement 2 = 173,000 / 20 years = 8,650
Accumulated depreciation-Building 2 = (632,500-75,000)/ 20 years = 27,875
Accumulated depreciation-Building 3 = (2,242,000 - 400,000) / 25 years = 73,680
In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays $2,750,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on...
Kindly please solve this thank you
Land Land Land Building 2 Building 3 Improvements 1 Improvements 2 Purchase Price Demolition Land grading New building (Construction cost) New improvements Totals ! Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below. In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays $2,650,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on it. It plans to demolish Building 1 and build a new store in its place. Building 2 will be a company office; it...
Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] On January 1, Mitzu Co. pays a lump-sum amount of $2,800,000 for land, Building 1, Building 2, and Land Improvements 1. Building 1 has no value and will be demolished. Building 2 will be an office and is appraised at $701,500, with a useful life of 20 years and a $80,000 salvage value. Land Improvements 1 is valued at $549,000 and is expected to last another 18 years with...
Required information Problem 8-3A Asset cost allocation; straight-line depreciation LO C1, P1 [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.) In January 2018, Mitzu Co. pays $2,600,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on it. It plans to demolish Building 1 and build a new store in its place. Building 2 will be a company office; it is appraised at $720,000, with a useful life of 20 years and a $75,000 salvage value. A lighted parking lot...
Required information Problem 8-3A Asset cost allocation; straight-line depreciation LO C1, P1 (The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] In January 2018, Mitzu Co. pays $2,600,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on it. It plans to demolish Building 1 and build a new store in its place. Building 2 will be a company office; it is appraised at $720,000, with a useful life of 20 years and a $75,000 salvage value. A lighted parking lot...
Required information Problem 8-3A Asset cost allocation; straight-line depreciation LO C1, P1 [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays $2,600,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on it. It plans to demolish Building 1 and build a new store in its place. Building 2 will be a company office; it is appraised at $644,000, with a useful life of 20 years and a $60,000 salvage value. A lighted parking lot...
The following information applies to the questions displayed below.) On January 1. Mitzu Co, pays a lump-sum amount of $2,800,000 for land, Building 1, Building 2, and Land Improvements 1 Building 1 has no value and will be demolished. Building 2 will be an office and is appraised at $737,500, with a useful life of 20 years and a $85,000 salvage value. Land Improvements 1 is valued at $501,500 and is expected to last another 17 years with no salvage...
Please answer the whole question.
and how did you figure out the percentages.
Required information
[The following information applies to the questions
displayed below.]
In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays $2,650,000 for a tract of land
with two buildings on it. It plans to demolish Building 1 and build
a new store in its place. Building 2 will be a company office; it
is appraised at $701,500, with a useful life of 20 years and a
$80,000 salvage value. A...
Che (The following information applies to the questions displayed below. On January 1, Mitzu Co. pays a lump-sum amount of $2,650,000 for land, Building 1, Building 2, and Land Improvements 1. Building 1 has no value and will be demolished. Building 2 will be an office and is appraised at $630,000, with a useful life of 20 years and a $75,000 salvage value. Land Improvements 1 is valued at $540,000 and is expected to last another 18 years with no...
On January 1, Mitzu Co. pays a lump-sum amount of $2,800,000 for land, Building 1, Building 2, and Land Improvements 1. Building 1 has no value and will be demolished. Building 2 will be an office and is appraised at $737,500, with a useful life of 20 years and a $85,000 salvage value. Land Improvements 1 is valued at $501,500 and is expected to last another 17 years with no salvage value. The land is valued at $1,711,000. The company...
On March 31, 2020, Capital Investment Advisers paid $4,610,000 for land with two buildings on it. The plan was to demolish Building 1 and build a new store (Building 3) in its place. Building 2 was to be used as a company office and was appraised at a value of $1,028,940. A lighted parking lot near Building 2 had improvements (Land Improvements 1) valued at $608,010. Without considering the buildings or improvements, the tract of land was estimated to have...