Q-1: The type of good involved in this case is public - water. Due to high water bills, Bostonians started drilling own wells and they started leaving the system of paying water bills and started using water from their own drilled wells. The projects were funded by bills that people pay who were in the system and now as people started leaving the system there will be a problem in financing and the people who are remaining will have higher financing burden.
The good involved is public and financing approach is not appropriate this water projects should be funded by the government and the financing burden should be on the head of government as to stop depleting water and stop people digging their own wells.
Q-2 Government of Boston can give concession on water bills if people use in some limited quantity in this way the water usage will be lowered and people will not drill their own well.
Q-3 To prevent further damage of water their should be strict rules and exorbitant taxes on drilling new wells and if people use the water provided by the government agency then there should be some concession on water bill if people use the water in optimum amount.
CASES FOR DISCUSSION CASE 1-1 Market Interplay, Municipal Utilities, and a Common-Pool Resource Governments often are...
How can we assess whether a project is a success or a failure? This case presents two phases of a large business transformation project involving the implementation of an ERP system with the aim of creating an integrated company. The case illustrates some of the challenges associated with integration. It also presents the obstacles facing companies that undertake projects involving large information technology projects. Bombardier and Its Environment Joseph-Armand Bombardier was 15 years old when he built his first snowmobile...