Question

This is a post first discussion forum. Please respond to the following scenario: Chapter 8 Discussion Board A Question of Ethics Criminal Process. Gary Peters fraudulently told an undocumented immigrant that Peters could help him obtain lawful status. Peters said that he knew immigration officials and asked for money to aid the process. victim paid Peters at least $25,000 in wire transfers and checks. Peters had others call the victim, falsely represent that they were agents with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and induce continued payments. He threatened to contact authorities to detain or deport the victim and his wife. Peters was convicted in a federal district court of wire fraud. (United States v. Peters, 2015 WL 120637 (11th Cir. 2015)) (See Constitutional Safeguards and Criminal Procedures.) 1. Peters had previously committed theft and fraud. The court stated, "This is the person he is. He steals from his relatives. He steals from his business partner. He steals from immigrants. He steals from anybody he comes into contact with." What does Peters's conduct indicate about his ethics? 2. Peters's attorney argued that his client's criminal history was partially due to "difficult personal times" caused by divorce, illness, and job loss. Despite this claim, Peters was sentenced to forty-eight months imprisonment, which exceeded the federal sentencing guidelines but was less than the statutory maximum of twenty years. Was this sentence too harsh or too lenient? Discuss. After you have read the scenario, please answer the two questions posed in the scenario and men respond to two other students. ! o 9 e

Answer 1

Refer the below images for the above asked case , in a detailed way of explanation.
Answer: peters can be perceived as an arrogant persona displaying a feeling of Superiority - and lacking empathy for others, particularly those victims who trusted him a those whom he threated- → There is no indication that he had It takes to live in society without and victimizing others. any lying sense to of wha stealing from → To behave ethically requires refrain from illegal conduct for others. atteast and a a willingness degree of to empathy ... 11 peter's misconduct showed that his these qualities. In other words, he had no ethical principles character lacked seems to have → put illegal It might be pointed out that it peters had the ingenuity and energy he expended on his Schemes to legal, practical use, he might have engineered a successful business Instead, his lack of ethics robbed of money & property, as well as to trust and to do business in himself the good and others opportunity faith.

- The court that sentenced Peters concluded that a Sentence of forty - eight months imprisonment was appropriate at The court toond the federal setenting guidelines "entirely inadequate in this case. They fail to account for the threats that were made to the victim and his wife. They fail to account for the kinds of vulnerabilities that someone in this victim's Situation faced. The guidelines are too low in this case in relationship to the defendant's criminal history is the defendant's conduct ... His own family describes him as a thief". → The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the sentence. "An above - guideline range Sentence was necessary to achieve the statutory porposes of sentencing. As the court found the conduct underlying the offence was serious". > peter's criminal history supported a need for & deterrence in fashioning an appropriate sentence. The Sentence is also supported by the need to protect the poblic from torther crimes of peters." The court added, "The 48 -month sentence was considerably lower than the Statutory maximum sentence of 20 years, signaling that the sentence was substantively reasonable.