In the Beazer Homes fraud case, what elements of the fraud triangle were present?
ANSWER:
In the Beazer Homes fraud case, the presence of opportunity, incentive, and rationalization which are elements of the fraud triangle drastically increased the probability of fraud. Beazer's Homes scheme reported net income by recording improper accounting reserves during specific periods between 2000 and 2005 for meeting or exceeding the expectations of analysts' for Beazer's diluted earnings per share (EPS) and maximize officer and senior employee yearly bonuses. Beazer was aware there was an:
(a) opportunity that they could make a big amount of money by revenue manipulation, and
(b) from that revenue, they were able to earn incentives which were reimbursed later.
(c) the incentives themselves made them rationalize as they wanted to believe that the incentives came from model houses that were sold properly.
Thus, Beazer violated objectivity, integrity, and professional due care in the code of professional conduct.
In the Beazer Homes fraud case, what elements of the fraud triangle were present?
In the Beazer Homes fraud case, what were the consequences for the company and the key players?
In the Beazer Homes fraud case, describe the evidence that may have been collected.
Explain the fraud in the Beazer Homes scheme.
Identify and explain the three elements of the fraud triangle. Explain the importance of the fraud triangle for small business owners.
Compose a case or (make up) a case where all of the elements of the fraud triangle are evident! Question 3 asks to explain what is wrong with the statement below. What kind of suspicous activity do you see? PLEASE HELP!! Question 2 (20 points) Compose a fact pattern or scenario or case whereby all of the elements of the fraud triangle would be evident Question 3 (20 points) Q1 Q2 Cash $1,000,000 $200,000 Accounts Receivable $ 500,000 $500,000 Inventory...
One of the elements of the Fraud Triangle focuses on how easy or hard it is for the internal control system to prevent any fraud from happening. 1) Briefly name and describe this part of the Fraud Triangle (4 pts - use about 3 sentences) 2) What are TWO procedures the Auditor would conduct in order to provide evidence about this part of the Fraud Triangle. (3 pts each - state the procedure and the evidence in about 2 sentences...
Can the elements of the Fraud Triangle be observed? Let's explore this idea by responding to each of the following: "An organization with significant fraud risk looks and sounds like" "An organization with minimal fraud risk looks and sounds like"
Using Cressy’s fraud triangle theory use a know fraud case that has been in the news (Enron, Bernie Madoff, Wisconsin case at Koss Sue Sachdeva) or one that you are aware from your own experiences to support Cressy’s theory or the dis-prove his theory
There are three elements present for every fraud that is committed: Opportunity (a favorable situation), Motivation (the need for something), and Rationalization (justifying the act at some level) 1. Give an example for each of these elements when fraud regarding cash has been committed. For example, what could be an example of opportunity, motivation, and rationalization in a fraud that involved cash. 2. How would the internal controls be used to counteract or diminish the recurrence of the fraud?
Describe the fraud triangle and what it represents.