Most appropriate response: (c) Irrational forces
Justification:
Under the Irrational forces jurisprudential thought, laws are
formulated as the result of societal reactions to unique events and
is not founded upon reason.
In the current scenario, the banning of weaponry is clearly in
response to a unique event of a public shooting. There is no other
legal precedence for the enforcement of such law. The enforcing
authority is under pressure to "take action" in such a sensitive
situation. Hence, to calm the public, the ban is enforced.
Therefore, Irrational forces.
After a tragic event in which an armed intruder storms into a mall and fatally shoots...
Casey is on trial under criminal allegations that she engaged in fraudulent behavior at the company she manages. She is worried when the plaintiff alleges that it has "unambiguous proof" that Casey is guilty. Which of the following is most likely true? The plaintiff will most likely prove Casey is guilty, since criminal charges only need to meet a prima facie burden of proof. Casey need not worry about the plaintiff's evidence, since parties tend to boast about the level...