Marginal abatement cost is 1000€ per week.
a. In uncontrolled situation total emission is 12 tons + 12 tons = 24 tons per week. If the target is to reduce the emission by 50% then total emission should be 12 tons per week. If we reduce from both source by 50% then from source 1 there will be 6 tons of emission and from 2 there will be 6 tons of emission. If we reduce from source 1 total abatement cost will be 0+1+2+3+4+5 = 15 i.e 15,000€ per week. It is because if we allow upto 6 tons per week so from 7 ton of each source we need to consider the abatement cost. So from source 1 the total abatement cost will be 15000€. Now from source 2 the total abatement cost will be 0+2+4+6+10+14 = 36 i.e 36000€ per week if we also allow 6 tons of emission from source 2. So total cost of decreasing equi proportionately fro both source is 15000+36000= 51000€ per week.
b) Now according to equi-marginal principle we know that we need to reduce the emission from each source so that their marginal abatement cost is same. Here we need to reduce the emission by 12 tons. Now total emission reduce will be 12 tons so that their marginal abatement cost is same. By analysing the table we can say that if we allow 4 tons of emission from source 1 and 8 tons of from source 2 we see that their marginal abatement cost that time are same i.e both are 10 i.e 10000€ per week. Then total cost of abatement from source 1 if we reduce 8 tons will be 0+1+2+3+4+5+6+8 = 29 i.e 29000€ per week. From source 2 if we reduce by 4 tons then total abatement cost from source 2 will be 0+2+4+6 = 12 i.e 12000€ per week. So from both source the total abatement cost will be 29000+12000 = 41000€ per week.
2. The table shows the emissions of two sources and the marginal abatement costs (MCC, 1,000/week)...
9) A regulation was applied to reduce SO, on national level. The researchers evaluated MCC and MDC. functions for the pollutant: MCC 72-SE, MDC - 4E. (20 p) The table shows the emissions of two sources and the marginal abatement costs (MCC 1,000/week) Emissions, tons/week MCC: Source MCC: Source 2 0 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 14 24 0 24810 14 20 25 31 38 58 Suppose that initially each source is emitting at the uncontrolled level (10...
he following table contains information on the marginal abatement costs of four firms, related to the quantity of emissions. Currently, Firm 1 emits 40 tons/week, Firm 2 emits 35 tons/week, Firm 3 emits 30 tons/week, and Firm 4 emits 25 tons/week. Thus, total emissions are 130 tons/week. Suppose the government wishes to reduce total emissions to 60 tons/week. Emissions 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 MAC Firm 1 ($/ton) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7...
Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1 =12−2E1MAC2 =10−E2. Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 12 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint: This will be a...
Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1=12 - 2E1 MAC2 =10 - E2 Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 1/2 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint:...