An advertisement for Claritin, a drug for seasonal nasal allergies, made this claim “Clear relief without drowsiness. In studies, the incidence of drowsiness was similar to placebo.” (Time, Feb. 6, 1995, p. 43). The advertisement also reported that 8% of the 1926 Claritin takers reported drowsiness as a side effect, compared with 6% of the 2545 placebo takers.
a. Define the parameters p1 and p2 in words. Set up
null and alternate hypotheses for whether the rate of drowsiness
with Claritin is higher than with placebo.
b. Calculate the number of drowsy Claritin users and
the number of drowsy placebo users. Be sure to round to whole
numbers of people!
c. Calculate , p-hat pooled, the overall rate of
drowsiness.
d. Calculate SE pooled (p-hat) using the formula
e. Calculate the z-score and p-value for the difference
in proportions.
f. Conclude whether to reject the null hypothesis or
not. Make a conclusion that includes the context of the situation
(your sentence should be about drowsiness rates of Claritin vs
placebo).
(a)
Here p1 shows the true proportion of Claritin takers reported drowsiness as a side effect.
Here p2 shows the true proportion of placebo takers reported drowsiness as a side effect.
Hypotheses are:
(b)
The number of drowsy Claritin users is
The number of drowsy placebo users is
(c)
The pooled p-hat is 0.0686
(d)
The standard error is
SE = 0.0076
(e)
The z-score = 2.63
The p-value = 0.0043
(f)
Since p-value is less than 0.05 so we reject the null hypothesis. There is evidence to conclude that the rate of drowsiness with Claritin is higher than with placebo.
An advertisement for Claritin, a drug for seasonal nasal allergies, made this claim “Clear relief without...