Fay "hires" her four-year-old son as the office manager for her real estate firm. She deducts $20,000 annual salary paid to her sonas a business expense. The IRS disallows the deduction upon examination of Fay's tax return. Which of the following concepts or doctrines supports the position of the IRS?
Group of answer choices
all-inclusive income concept
substance-over-form doctrine
claim-of-right doctrine
entity concept
realization concept
The text stated that realized gains from certain types of transactions (e.g., like-kind exchanges) are deferred for recognition in a future period. The basis of this treatment is the
Group of answer choices
annual accounting period concept
business purpose concept
wherewithal-to-pay concept
capital recovery concept
Disallowance of deduction by IRS,
the IRS might have according to substance over form disallowed the deduction, as per legal concepts any expenses incurred may be deducted from the total income inorder to arrive at the taxable income. But thinking in an economic manner, as the substance over form says, 4 year old son does not have any qualifications to act as a manager. So the answer is substance over form.
The text realised gains from certain transactions are deferred for recognition in a future period, on the basis of annual accounting period concept. Because no other concept is accepting the statement. It might be on the basis that business entity will exist into the future. So the answer is annual accounting period concept.
Fay "hires" her four-year-old son as the office manager for her real estate firm. She deducts...