H) Do you agree that companies under perfect competition as well as monopoly are enjoying productive efficiency and allocative efficiency? what is condition for productive efficiency and allocative efficiency? Would be greatly appreciated if answer is in 5sentences and by your own, thank you.
A firm can be called productive efficient when they are producing at the lowest point of the average cost curve and they are considered as allocative efficient when the price of the good is equal to the marginal cost.
A firm under can be considered as both allocative and productive efficient because they produce at the lowest point of the average total cost and at that point the price and the marginal cost are equal. On the other hand the monopoly produce at the point where the average cost curve is still declining and the price is tangent to it and the price is also double the marginal cost of the good. making a monopoly both allocative and productive inefficient.
H) Do you agree that companies under perfect competition as well as monopoly are enjoying productive...
please make at least 5 sentences. Q 5) Do you agree that companies under perfect competition as well as monopoly are enjoying productive efficiency and allocative efficiency? what is condition for productive efficiency and allocative efficiency? (2 points)
H) Compare the individual demand curve and marginal revenue curve for company under perfect competition as well as monopoly. I would be greatly appreciated if the answer is in 5sentences and by your own thank you.
Chapter 13—Monopoly and Antitrust Laws Complete the statement on allocative and productive efficiency. Perfect competition achieves allocative efficiency because the market price is and productive efficiency because firms produce in a perfectly competitive outcome. A monopoly outcome usually fails to be allocatively efficient because the market price is and usually fails to reach productive efficiency because the monopolist produces in a monopoly outcome.
You are a producer! Would you prefer to operate under perfect competition or under monopoly? Why? Give two reasons to justify your argument.
Compare the welfare implications of perfect competition and a monopoly with first degree price discrimination. Under what conditions do we have market efficiency?
Q) Do you think Monopoly business practice is so bad for the general public's welfare? why? or why not? Explain based on cost and benefit analysis of social welfare. Would be greatly appreciated if the answered in 5sentences by your own, not copy and pasted
Only THIS SIDE MONOPOLY Woreksiteet Hint: Under perfect competition price is fixed for a small producer and MR is the same as price. Under monopoly demand is down sloping and price changes at different quantities. Therefore under monopoly MR is no longer the same as price. You need to calculate it. MR equals change in TR divided by change in Q. TR is still the product of price multiplied by quantity and the rules of profit maximization are the same...
"Monopolistic competition has a little monopoly and a little competition, hence its name." Do you agree ? Why or why not?
Q) Would you give us another notorious example like Monopoly case in the past or present (such as Standard Oil, Morgan House, OPEC with high energy price, lately case of INTEL)? Your Monopoly example should be based on high concentration of market share and high abnormal profits. Would be greatly appreciated if Answered in 5sentences by out own.
What kind of business structure(s) (Perfect Competition, Monopoly, Monopolistic Competition, or Oligopoly) would you classify eBay as? Why?