Question

How could you paraphrase or rewrite this one:

From a logical standpoint, I think the violinist, Henry Fonda, chocolate box and seed metaphors were all valid.The violinist example illustrates the difference between what one has a right to and what is a kindness or act of charity as do the Henry Fonda chocolate box metaphors. They both also include discussion of the level of inconvenience and harm. Thomson asserts that many would think it less immoral to refuse help in many of these scenarios if the inconvenience is greater to the individual being asked to help. This seems to be a very fair and consistent point to bring to an argument in defense of abortion because the potential for complications in pregnancy are great and the level of inconvenience is very high so pointing out how these considerations usually affect our moral judgment help her defense. The seed metaphor is also logically valid and applies well to the example of pregnancy and abortion. Most would not assign blame in cases where a person has taken reasonable precautions against plant growth or burglary so it feeds well into her defense of abortion. All these cases support her position that there can be more and less wrong abortions; she does not say that all abortions are impermissible nor that they are all permissible. What seems logically inconsistent or perhaps just confusing is that she premises her entire paper on the idea that fetuses are people from the moment of conception only to abandon that precept with little explanation in the last two sentences of the paper.

Answer 1

From a logical viewpoint, I think the violinist, Henry Fonda, chocolate container and seed metaphors had been all valid. The violinist example illustrates the distinction among what one has a proper to and what's kindness or act of charity as do the Henry Fonda chocolate container metaphors. They both also include dialogue of the level of inconvenience and harm. Thomson asserts that many would suppose it much less immortal to refuse to assist in lots of these eventualities if the inconvenience is greater to the man or woman being asked to assist. This seems to be a very honest and consistent factor to deliver to an argument in defence of abortion because the potential for worry in pregnancy is awesome and the level of inconvenience could be very excessive so stating how these considerations generally have an effect on our moral judgement help her defence. The seed metaphor is likewise logically legitimate and applies properly to the instance of being pregnant and abortion. Most could now not assign blame in instances in which someone has taken reasonable precautions towards plant increase or housebreaking so it feeds well into her defence of abortion. All these instances guide her position that there may be more and much less incorrect abortion; she does no longer say that all abortions are impermissible nor that they're all permissible.

What appears logically inconsistent or possibly just puzzling is that she premises her whole paper on the concept that fetuses are humans from the instant of thought simplest to desert that percept with little rationalization in the last sentences of the paper