suppse that brazil is a capital abundant country and praguay is labour abundant country, describe the potential migration of the factors of the migration between the two countries. explainthe potential effects on the returns to capital and labour in each country
Brazil being a country with capital in abundant amount will produce capital intensive goods, so attract migration of those workers who are skilled and can work in capital intensive industry. Here, the migration of these workers will be from Paraguay to Brazil. Though, Paraguay, being a labor intensive country, will produce labor intensive goods, so attracting migration of workers from Brazil to Paraguay who are less skilled and adapted to work in labor intensve industry.
The potential effect will be that Brazil will develop comparative advantage in capital intensive goods and Paraguay will develop comparative advantage in labor intensive goods. Afterwards, they can trade with each other and consume goods outside of the their PPF curve of before trade.
suppse that brazil is a capital abundant country and praguay is labour abundant country, describe the...
Given the following economies: Countries A and B have two factors of production- labour and capital, which have some degree of substitutability. Country A is relatively capital-abundant. They each have the ability to produce two goods- X and Y. Production of X is relatively capital-intensive. Technology and tastes are identical in countries A and B. Consider the following four cases. I. An increase in A’s capital stock II. An increase in A’s labour supply III. An increase in B’s capital...
India is labour (L) abundant and the US is capital (K) abundant. The cut diamonds (C) Industry is L intensive while washing machines (W) manufacturing is K-intensive. If India and the US start trading with each other, then under the assumptions of the Heckscher-Ohlin Model: O Pc/Pw will rise in both countries. Pc/Pw will fall in India but rise in the US. e Pc/Pw will rise in India but fall in the US. Pc/Pw will fall in both countries.
57. In a two-country world, if country A is the relatively labor-abundant and country B is the relatively capital-abundant country by the "price" definition of factor abundance and where w is the wage rate and r is the return to capital), then . When the countries move from autarky to Heckscher-Ohlin-type trade, the result will be that a. (w/r)A < (w/r); (w/r) will rise and (w/r)e will fall b. (w/r). < (w/r); (w/r)will fall and (w/r)s will rise c. (w/r)A>...
47. If relatively capital-abundant country A opens trade with relatively labor-abundant country B and the trade takes place in accordance with the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem, what would be the consequence for factor prices (w/r) in the two countries? a. (w/r) rises in A and falls in B b. (w/r) rises in A and also rises in B c. (w/r) falls in A and rises in B d. (w/r) falls in A and also falls in B 48. Which one of the...
KFrance and Italy only trade with each other; (each country is only capable of producing 2 goods, Wine and Bread; (the production of Bread is relatively capital intensive, and the production of Wine is relatively labor intensive, and (France is relatively abundant in capital, while Italy.is relatively abundant in labor. All assumptions from our class about the Heckscher-Ohlin model hold, in particular the fact that both countries have identical homothetic preferences, constant returns to scale in production, the countries are...
20 Doints) Assume that in a capital abundant country, there are three factors of production, r and capital and labor is the mobile factor. What will be the effect of trade on the 3) ( of land owners? Discuss and show on a diagram. e welfre 41 (20 points) Discuss th
Australia is land abundant; India is labor abundant. Wheat is land intensive relative to textiles. Graphically demonstrate the pre- and post-trade equilibria between these two countries. Find and label the trade triangles for each. Which factors gain and which factors lose when trade arises between these two countries? Explain carefully.
South Africa and Lesotho are two countries using capital (K) and labour (L) to produce cars and blankets. South Africa is a capital abundant country and Lesotho is a labour abundant country. The production of cars is capital intensive and blanket production is labour intensive. There is incomplete specialization in both countries. Using the hypothetical scenario above, explain and show with the aid of a well-drawn diagram, that factor endowments determine comparative advantage and therefore that there are gains to...
International trade, The standard model This is all information given for the question. The PPF has to be drawn with help of the information that A is relatively capital-abundant and that productiok of X is relatively capital intensive. Chapter 6, The Standard Model 1. Countries A and B have two factors of production- labour and capital, which have some degree of substitutability. Country A is relatively capital-abundant. They each have the ability to produce two goodsX and Y. Production of...
(10 marks) Suppose there exist 2 countries, Home and Foreign; 2 goods, X and Y; and 2 factors of production, labour (L) and capital (K). Each country can produce both goods. X is labour-intensive and Y is capital-intensive. Home is labour-abundant and Foreign is capital-abundant. Assume that the standard assumptions of the Heckscher-Ohlin model hold. When answering the following question, please support each of your arguments with detailed analysis and draw the relevant diagrams to support your answer. Consider a...