Question

3. Interlock Soy Products (USP) buys soybeans and processes them into other soy products. Each ton of soybeans that USP purchRequirement 2. Should USP have processed each of the products further? What effect does the allocation method have on this de

Options for 1-6:

(1):  process further / sell as is (2):  decreases / increases (3):  process further /  sell as is (4):  be higher if they do / be lower if they do (5): different / the same

(6): is / is not

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Total joint cost= 320 $ + 200 $= 520 $

(a)

Particulars

Cookies/ Soya meal

Soyola/ Soya oil

Total

Sale value at splitoff

864

510

1374

Weighing

62.88%

37.12%

100%

Joint cost allocated

326.99

193.01

520

(b)

Particulars

Cookies/ Soya meal

Soyola/ Soya oil

Total

Final sale value of production

1881

696

2577

Deduct separable cost

-370

-210

-580

Net realizable value

1511

486

1997

Weighing

75.66%

24.34%

100%

Joint cost allocated

393.45

126.55

520

(c)

Particulars

Cookies/ Soya meal

Soyola/ Soya oil

Sale value at splitoff

864

510

Process Further: NRV

1511

486

Profit (loss) from process

647

-24

USP should (1) process further the soya meal because it (2) increases the profit. They should (3) sell as is the soya oil because profit will (4) be higher if they do. Since the joint cost is (5) same under both allocation method, it (6) is not a relevant cost for decision to sell at splitoff or further process.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Options for 1-6: (1):  process further / sell as is (2):  decreases / increases (3):  process further /  sell as...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Illinois Soy Products (ISP) buys soybeans and processes them into other soy products. Each ton of...

    Illinois Soy Products (ISP) buys soybeans and processes them into other soy products. Each ton of soybeans that ISP purchases for $340can be converted for an additional $180into 675 poundsof soy meal and 140 gallonsof soy oil. A pound of soy meal can be sold at split off for $1.28 and can be sold in bulk for $4.75per gallon. ISP can process the 675 pounds of soy meal into 825 pounds of soy cookiesat an additional cost of $340.Each pound...

  • b. Now allocate the joint cost to the cookies and the Soyola using the NRV method....

    b. Now allocate the joint cost to the cookies and the Soyola using the NRV method. (Round the weights to three decimal places and joint costs to the nearest dollar.) Cookies Soyola Total Final sales value of total production Deduct separable costs Net realizable value Weighting Joint costs allocated Requirement 2. Should ISP have processed each of the products further? What effect does the allocation method have on this decision? Begin by calculating the profit or loss that would occur...

  • Innerva Soy Products ​(​MSP) buys soybeans and processes them into other soy products. Each ton of...

    Innerva Soy Products ​(​MSP) buys soybeans and processes them into other soy products. Each ton of soybeans that MSP purchases for $340 can be converted for an additional $220 into 500 lbs of soy meal and 80 gallons of soy oil. A pound of soy meal can be sold at splitoff for $1.24 and soy oil can be sold in bulk for $4 per gallon. MSP can process the 500 pounds of soy meal into 550 pounds of soy cookies...

  • Saskatchewan Soy Products (SSP) buys soy beans and processes them into other soy products. Each tonne...

    Saskatchewan Soy Products (SSP) buys soy beans and processes them into other soy products. Each tonne of soy beans that SSP purchases for $380 can be converted for an additional $190 into 700 lbs of soy meal and 80 gallons of soy oil. A pound of soy meal can be sold at splitoff for $1.12, and soy oil can be sold in bulk for $4 per gallon. SSP can process the 700 lbs of soy meal into 750 lbs of...

  • Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two...

    Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two products, overs and unders, in a single process. The joint costs of this process were $50,000, and 14,000 units of overs and 35,000 units of unders were produced. Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: overs, $18,000; unders, $19,900. Overs sell for $2.00 per unit; unders sell for $3.14 per unit. Required: 1. Allocate the $50,000 joint costs using the estimated...

  • Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two...

    Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two products, overs and unders, in a single process. The joint costs of this process were $50,000, and 15,000 units of overs and 35,000 units of unders were produced. Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: overs, $20,000; unders, $19,900. Overs sell for $2.00 per unit; unders sell for $3.14 per unit. Required: 1. Allocate the $50,000 joint costs using the estimated...

  • Exercise 13-6 Sell or Process Further (LO6) Dorsey Company manufactures three products from a common input...

    Exercise 13-6 Sell or Process Further (LO6) Dorsey Company manufactures three products from a common input in a joint processing operation. Joint processing costs up to the split-off point total $350,000 per quarter. The company allocates these costs to the joint products on the basis of their relative sales value at the split-off point. Unit selling prices and total output at the split-off point are as follows: Product Selling Price Quarterly Output A $16 per pound 15,000 B $8 per...

  • Rouse Company is one of the world's leading com refiners. It produces two joint products-com synup...

    Rouse Company is one of the world's leading com refiners. It produces two joint products-com synup and com starch-using a common production process. In July 2017, Rouse reported the folowing production and selling-price information: (Click the icon to view the information.) Requirement Allocate the $325,000 joint costs using the NRV method. (Round the weights to two decimal places) Com syrup Com starch Total Final sales value of total production Deduct separable costs NRV at splitoff point Weighting Joint costs alocated...

  • The Stenback Company produces two products, turpentine and methanol (wood alcohol), by a joint process. Joint...

    The Stenback Company produces two products, turpentine and methanol (wood alcohol), by a joint process. Joint costs amount to $144,000 per batch of output. Each batch totals 40,000 litres: 25% methanol and 75% turpentine. Both products are processed further without gain or loss in volume. Separable processing costs are methanol, $0.90 per litre; turpentine, $0.60 per litre. Methanol sells for $6.30 per litre; turpentine sells for $4.20 per litre Required Requirement 1. How much joint costs per batch should be...

  • The Stenback Company produces two products, turpentine and methanol (wood alcohol), by a joint process. Joint...

    The Stenback Company produces two products, turpentine and methanol (wood alcohol), by a joint process. Joint costs amount to $144,000 per batch of output. Each batch totals 40,000 litres: 25% methanol and 75% turpentine. Both products are processed further without gain or loss in volume. Separable processing costs are methanol, $0.90 per litre; turpentine, $0.60 per litre. Methanol sells for $6.30 per litre; turpentine sells for $4.20 per litre. Required Methanol Turpentine Total Physical measure of total production 10,000 30,000...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT