Question

2. (a) Suppose that the government in country A cuts down a large part of the...

2.

(a) Suppose that the government in country A cuts down a large part of the country’s forested area to make land available for productive purposes. Using the Specific Factors model, examine the implications of this “deforestation” on the economy’s resource allocation and relative prices. (Assume that the economy produces two goods: manufacturing and food, and owns three factors of production: land, which is specific to the food industry; capital, which is specific to the manufacturing industry; and labor, which is freely mobile between either industry). Supplement your analysis with a suitable graphical exposition.

(b) Now suppose that country A enters into trade with country B, which has similar production patterns. However, country B is relatively well endowed with capital, while land is relatively abundant in country A. Using an appropriate graphical exposition, illustrate the pattern of trade and adjustment of relative prices between the two countries.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

2a) Agricultural production has risen over the past several decades through a combination of increased productivity and expansion of agricultural land, including expansion into tropical forests. Forest lost is directly connected with increased carbon dioxide emissions because carbon stored in trees is released to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. Another concern is loss of biodiversity, especially from loss of tropical forests.

An increasing global population as well as change in global diets toward more vegetable oils and animal products requires increased production of agricultural commodities. Improving yields is one way of increasing production, but often additional land is needed. On average, recent annual net forest loss was 5.2 million hectares in 2000- 2010. Deforestation causes soil degradation, disruptions to ecosystem services such as water cycling and air filtration, and biodiversity loss. It is estimated to be the source of 8-14 percent of global anthropogenic carbon emissions over 2000 - 2005.

Deforestation has a diverse set of proximate causes. Historically, small scale farmers were responsible for most deforestation in tropical Southeast Asia and Latin America. Since the 1990s, mechanised agribusiness and forestry, producing for global markets rather than local markets or subsistence, have increasingly driven deforestation in developing countries. Today , commercial agriculture at local and global scales is the most significant driver of deforestation worldwide.

b) In country A land is available abundantly where as country B is endowed with more capital. Country A has similar production pattern with country B. Since country A is having more land it would be better for country A should focus on production of food. On the other hand it would be better for country B should focus on manufacturing products.

Trade between both countries considered to be more beneficial. Country A imports more manufacturing products from country B, which could help in producing more of food grains. On the other hand country B imports more food grains from A at a reasonable price. So trade certainly confers more benefits to both the countries.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
2. (a) Suppose that the government in country A cuts down a large part of the...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • 61 Suppose that we are in a two-factor, two-country world where the factors of production are...

    61 Suppose that we are in a two-factor, two-country world where the factors of production are labor (L) and land (T), the returns to the factors are the wage rate (w) and the rental rate on land (t), and the countries are country A and country B. In this situation, country A is land-abundant relative to country B by the physical definition of relative factor abundance if price (or economic) definition if _, and country A is land-abundant relative to...

  • These questions are about international trade. I want to know the answers. 5 Heckscher-Ohlin Model. Suppose...

    These questions are about international trade. I want to know the answers. 5 Heckscher-Ohlin Model. Suppose the production of cloth is labour intensive and the production of food is land intensive and suppose the United States (US) is labour abundant and Canada is land abundant. (a) Show how the US production possibility frontier (PPF) differs from the Canadian PPF. Briefly explain. (Use the general version of the PPF's) (b) Which country will have the lower price of cloth Pc relative...

  • Suppose television production requires 20 units of labor and 4 units of land. Rice requires 1...

    Suppose television production requires 20 units of labor and 4 units of land. Rice requires 1 unit of labor and 4 units of land. If there is no trade, which good will be relatively cheaper in each country? If a free trade occurs, what will happen with relative prices of goods? If a free trade occurs, What will happen with the factors prices? Does this happen in the real world? Explain why yes or why not.

  • Suppose a country, whose production and consumption of cell phones is large relative to the world...

    Suppose a country, whose production and consumption of cell phones is large relative to the world market, has just entered the global market. If the country is a net-importer of cell phones, we would expect the world: Multiple Choice demand curve to shift more to the left than the world supply curve as a result. supply curve to shift more to the left than the world demand curve as a result. supply curve to shift more to the right than...

  • 47. If relatively capital-abundant country A opens trade with relatively labor-abundant country B and the trade...

    47. If relatively capital-abundant country A opens trade with relatively labor-abundant country B and the trade takes place in accordance with the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem, what would be the consequence for factor prices (w/r) in the two countries? a. (w/r) rises in A and falls in B b. (w/r) rises in A and also rises in B c. (w/r) falls in A and rises in B d. (w/r) falls in A and also falls in B 48. Which one of the...

  • International trade, The standard model This is all information given for the question. The PPF has...

    International trade, The standard model This is all information given for the question. The PPF has to be drawn with help of the information that A is relatively capital-abundant and that productiok of X is relatively capital intensive. Chapter 6, The Standard Model 1. Countries A and B have two factors of production- labour and capital, which have some degree of substitutability. Country A is relatively capital-abundant. They each have the ability to produce two goodsX and Y. Production of...

  • 2. Use the Heckscher-Ohlin model to consider the production of hand-made pottery and silicon microchips in...

    2. Use the Heckscher-Ohlin model to consider the production of hand-made pottery and silicon microchips in the UK and India. (a) Which country would you expect to be relatively labor abundant, and which relatively capital abundant? Why? (b) Which industry would you expect to be relatively labor intensive, and which capital intensive? Why? (c) Given your answers to (a) and (b), draw PPFs for each country. Assuming preferences are the same, add indifference curves and relative autarky price lines. What...

  • 2. Suppose country X produces two goods- computer (capital intensive) and shoes (labor intensive). The diagram...

    2. Suppose country X produces two goods- computer (capital intensive) and shoes (labor intensive). The diagram shows country X's PPF and the change of production point from A to B when country X starts trading with country Y. If country X is abundant in capital and Y is abundant in labor. a. Label the two axes in the diagram. b. Then draw: - the relative price lines before and after trade, - two indifference curves that maximize utility before and...

  • KFrance and Italy only trade with each other; (each country is only capable of producing 2...

    KFrance and Italy only trade with each other; (each country is only capable of producing 2 goods, Wine and Bread; (the production of Bread is relatively capital intensive, and the production of Wine is relatively labor intensive, and (France is relatively abundant in capital, while Italy.is relatively abundant in labor. All assumptions from our class about the Heckscher-Ohlin model hold, in particular the fact that both countries have identical homothetic preferences, constant returns to scale in production, the countries are...

  • Suppose a small country producing cars (C) and food (F) is closed to free trade. Its...

    Suppose a small country producing cars (C) and food (F) is closed to free trade. Its production possibilities frontier (PPF) reflects increasing costs (it’s bowed out). Finally, preferences in this country are such that consumers like both goods equally: U(DC , DF ) = D 1 2 CD 1 2 F . (a) Using graphs, show the autarky equilibrium in this country. Show both (i) a graph of the PPF and indifference curve, and (ii) a graph of relative demand...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT