A piece of land on the Griswold Scout Reservation has been clear-cut, and the property owner is deciding whether to replant. It costs $20,000 to do the initial tree replanting and an additional maintenance cost of $5,000 both one year later and two years later. Alternatively, GSR can earn 3% on its investments. The optimal harvest time for the planted trees is known to be 40 years of growth. At that time, GSR will receive $100,000.
a) Calculate the profitability of replanting.
b) GSR’s deed requires this piece of land to have a conservation easement within 50 years. If they replant, they will still receive harvest revenue as in part a), and now will also incur $5,000 of costs for site preparation 5 years after harvesting and then 5 years after that receive $10,000 payment from the Lakes Region Conservation Trust for granting the easement. Alternatively, GSR can choose not to replant now, incur the site prep costs 5 years from today and receive the easement revenue from LRCT 5 years after that. Show the profitability of each alternative.
Assuming profitability is return on investment in current terms.
The cashflows and NPV, based on a 3% rate, for the cashflows is shown below.
Year | Cashflow |
0 | -20000 |
1 | -5000 |
2 | -5000 |
3 | 0 |
4 | 0 |
5 | 0 |
6 | 0 |
7 | 0 |
8 | 0 |
9 | 0 |
10 | 0 |
11 | 0 |
12 | 0 |
13 | 0 |
14 | 0 |
15 | 0 |
16 | 0 |
17 | 0 |
18 | 0 |
19 | 0 |
20 | 0 |
21 | 0 |
22 | 0 |
23 | 0 |
24 | 0 |
25 | 0 |
26 | 0 |
27 | 0 |
28 | 0 |
29 | 0 |
30 | 0 |
31 | 0 |
32 | 0 |
33 | 0 |
34 | 0 |
35 | 0 |
36 | 0 |
37 | 0 |
38 | 0 |
39 | 0 |
40 | 100000 |
NPV | $1,088 |
The NPV has been calculated by the formula =NPV(rate,cashflow). Alternatively, it can be manually calculated by
NPV=-20000-5000/1.03-5000/1.032+100000/1.0340
Both will give the same answer.
Profitability=return/investment=1088/20000=5.44%
B. If they replant, the cashflow would be
Year | Cashflow |
0 | -20000 |
1 | -5000 |
2 | -5000 |
3 | 0 |
4 | 0 |
5 | 0 |
6 | 0 |
7 | 0 |
8 | 0 |
9 | 0 |
10 | 0 |
11 | 0 |
12 | 0 |
13 | 0 |
14 | 0 |
15 | 0 |
16 | 0 |
17 | 0 |
18 | 0 |
19 | 0 |
20 | 0 |
21 | 0 |
22 | 0 |
23 | 0 |
24 | 0 |
25 | 0 |
26 | 0 |
27 | 0 |
28 | 0 |
29 | 0 |
30 | 0 |
31 | 0 |
32 | 0 |
33 | 0 |
34 | 0 |
35 | 0 |
36 | 0 |
37 | 0 |
38 | 0 |
39 | 0 |
40 | 100000 |
41 | 0 |
42 | 0 |
43 | 0 |
44 | 0 |
45 | -5000 |
46 | 0 |
47 | 0 |
48 | 0 |
49 | 0 |
50 | 10000 |
NPV | $2,047 |
Since NPV is 2047, profitability=2047/20000=10.235%
If they do not replant, the cashflow would be
Year | Cashflow |
0 | 0 |
1 | 0 |
2 | 0 |
3 | 0 |
4 | 0 |
5 | -5000 |
6 | 0 |
7 | 0 |
8 | 0 |
9 | 0 |
10 | 10000 |
NPV | 3127.90 |
But since the investment is after 5 years, to calculate profitability we also need its NPV today. NPV of 5000 after 5 years is
NPV=-5000/1.035
=4313
Hence, profitability=3127.90/4313=72.52%
A piece of land on the Griswold Scout Reservation has been clear-cut, and the property owner...
4. Perform a SWOT analysis for Fitbit. Based on your assessment of these, what are some strategic options for Fitbit going forward? 5. Analyze the company’s financial performance. Do trends suggest that Fitbit’s strategy is working? 6.What recommendations would you make to Fitbit management to address the most important strategic issues facing the company? Fitbit, Inc., in 2017: Can Revive Its Strategy and It Reverse Mounting Losses? connect ROCHELLE R. BRUNSON Baylor University MARLENE M. REED Baylor University in the...