Question

Tools Table Window Help HW 3-Saved to my Mac Mailings ferences Review View Ap a v AaBbCcD AaBbCcDdEAa AaßbCcDdEe AaBbCeDdEe A v Ta Normal No Spacing Heading 1 Heading 2 The married sample comprised members of 100 heterosexual couples (54 % were women and 46 % were men) from a Midwestern university. The dating sample also consisted of members of 100 heterosexual couples (59 % were women and 41 % were men) from the same Midwestern university. All the married and dating couples were Euro-American. A researcher selected subjects in a haphazard fashion and asked them to complete a short survey. The mean age of the sample was 26.7 years (SD-2.6) The Affectionate Communication Index is a 19-item index that.. assesses the amount of verbal and nonverbal affectionate communication and support on a 7-point...scale, with anchors of 1 partners always engage in this type of affectionate activity to 7- partners never engage in this type of activity. [Thus, lower scores indicate more affectionate communication. Table 1 shows the results for the nonverbal activities. TABLE DATING AND MARRIED INDrvIDUALS REPORTS OF NONVIRAL AFFECTIONATE COMMUNICATION SD м Item 3.3 1.9 100 3.7 Dating Married Dating Married Hold hands 2.9 17 100 4.9t 2.9 15 100 Kiss on the lips 1.1 16 100 2.0 4.5t 3.6 100 Dating Married Dating Маrried Dating Married Dating Married Dating Married Kiss on the cheeks 1.3 2.7 100 18 5.0t 100 42 Give massages to cach other 25 18 99 4.6t 3.6 1.8 100 Put arm around shoulder 13 2.5 92 16 2.0 2.5 100 Hug cach other 1.2 2.1 100 3.9t 1.6 96 2.9 Sit close to cach other 1.6 2.0 100 1.0 1.6 100 3.3 Dating Married Dating Married Look into each other's eyes 1.8 3.0 100 1.7 2.3 4.7 100 Wink at each other 1.9 4.2 96 "p<.05, tpc.001. Source: Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2004). Reported affectionate communication and satisfaction in marital and dating relationships, Psychological Reports, 95, 1154-1160. Focus s) dtv ((

Answer 1

Yes. The different is significant at 0.1% level of significance The difference is significant because It - Statistic for it has a pleas sign which mean it p value si Tour result is significant Jhus 2) yes, since rejected at P value co.ool, Ho should be 0.1% level of significance

Date Page No. 3) t statistic for since look unto each other's eyes and wink at each other do not have any sign after it thus the difference is not statistically significant for them. 4) any No, As t statistic value does not have sign after it , thus it means that p value >0.05 and > 0.001 - Thus result is not statistically significant 5) Hug at each other has after t statistic. Thus Statistically significant lat 0.lol. a asterick sign result is at 57. but not ! 6) Hugging each o.us while is significant each other is level other is significant at sitting close to each other. at 0.ool Thus hugging significant at higher