Question

An incremental ROR analysis was made with two alternatives, G and H, as shown in Table 1. The incremental cash flows are give
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Correct answer is 1st option 30000

Since, here initial cost of G is more than H.

So, according to ROR we do = G - H

So, in 3rd year = G - H = 80000 - 50000 = $30000

Please don't forget to rate the answer if its helpful, thank you.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
An incremental ROR analysis was made with two alternatives, G and H, as shown in Table...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Question 2 (1 point) A tabulation of incremental cash flow between two different-life alternatives must be...

    Question 2 (1 point) A tabulation of incremental cash flow between two different-life alternatives must be prepared over the LCM of their lives. True False Question 3 (1 point) In evaluating mutually exclusive alternatives on the basis of rate of return, it is necessary to conduct an "Incremental ROR"in order to obtain the same ranking as the PW and AW methods True False Question 7 (1 point) When an incremental rate of return analysis is conducted correctly, the alternative identified...

  • Either of the cost alternatives shown below can be used in a chemical refining process. If the company’s MARR is 15% per year, determine which should be selected on the basis of an incremental ROR ana...

    Either of the cost alternatives shown below can be used in a chemical refining process. If the company’s MARR is 15% per year, determine which should be selected on the basis of an incremental ROR analysis. A B First cost ,$ − 40,000 − 61,000 Annual cost, $/year − 25,000 − 19,000 Salvage value, $ 8,000 11,000 Life, years 5 5 5       -       A.       B.       C.       D.       E.       F.    The incremental rate of return computed using a present worth analysis...

  • 4-2 a. Calculate the PW of alternatives A & B in the following table using an...

    4-2 a. Calculate the PW of alternatives A & B in the following table using an MARR of 10%. b. Complete the incremental cash flow column: Incremental Cash Flow, Δ(B-A) First cost. S Annual revenue, S/yr Useful life, yrs 12.000 4,000 25.000 5,100 e. Calculate the PW of the incremental cash flow. d. Set up (but do not solve) the ROR calculation of the incremental cash flow using PW.

  • The following mutually exclusive investment alternatives have been presented to you. The life of all alternatives...

    The following mutually exclusive investment alternatives have been presented to you. The life of all alternatives is 10 years. A В C Capital investment Annual expenses $60,000 $90,000 $40,000 $30,000 $70,000 35,000 45,000 15,000 30,000 40,000 25,000 16,000 Annual revenues 50,000 52.000 38,000 28,000 Market value at EOY 10 15,000 10,000 10,000 39.0% 10,000 IRR ??? 7.4% 30.8% 9.2% After the base alternative has been identified, the first comparison to be made in an incremental analysis should be which of...

  • show the formula   Compare the following alternatives on the basis of Present worth Analysis at an...

    show the formula   Compare the following alternatives on the basis of Present worth Analysis at an interest rate of 6% per year.|| First Cost, $ Annual Operating cost, $ /year Annual Revenues, $/year Salvage Value, $ Life years Petroleum Based Feedstock -350,000 -130,000 300,000 45,000 Inorganic Based Feedstock -120,000 -60,000 290,000 34,000 You should consider Least Common Multiple of 6 and 4) which is 12 years in your analysis instead of 4 or 6 years! Petroleum Based Feedstock Inorganic Based...

  • Question 1 The cash flows given in table below are for two different alternatives. MARR =10%...

    Question 1 The cash flows given in table below are for two different alternatives. MARR =10% Data IN Initial Cost Annual Benefits Salvage Value Useful Life in years M $20,000 $6,000 $5,000 $80,000 $10,000 $20,000 a) Determine the annual worth of alternative M b) Determine the annual worth of alternative N

  • 3. You are investigating 3 alternatives to your current production process The following table indicates the...

    3. You are investigating 3 alternatives to your current production process The following table indicates the cash flow differences for each alternative from the current process over the expected 3 year remaining life of the process. Note that staying with the current process is also an option. Calculate the NPW of each and indicate which option should be selected. The company's MARR=18%. (Years) Alt. A Alt. B Alt. C 0 $100,000-$50,000-$80,000 1 $0 $20,000 $40,000 2 $70,000 $30,000 $40,000 3...

  • Please write neatly. DO NOT USE EXCEL! Thank you. Question #4 (25 Points) Three alternatives are...

    Please write neatly. DO NOT USE EXCEL! Thank you. Question #4 (25 Points) Three alternatives are being considered. The table below shows the associated cash flows with each alternative The company uses MARR of 20% per year Alternative A $40,000 $38,000 $25,000 $10,000 6 vears 26% Alternative BAlternative C Capital investment Annual Revenu Annual Cost Salvage value Useful life IRR $60,000 $53,000 $30,000 $10,000 6 years 3390 $30,000 $28,000 $16,000 $10,000 6 vears 35% Using incremental analysis, determine which is...

  • ROR ANALYSIS WITH ESTIMATED LIVES THAT VARY Background Make-to-Specs is a software system under development by...

    ROR ANALYSIS WITH ESTIMATED LIVES THAT VARY Background Make-to-Specs is a software system under development by ABC Corporation. It will be able to translate digital versions of three-dimensional computer models, containing a wide variety of part shapes with machined and highly finished (ultra smooth) surfaces. The product of the system is the numerically controlled (NC) machine code for the part’s manufacturing. Additionally, Make-to-Specs will build the code for superfine finishing of surfaces with continuous control of the finishing machines. Information...

  • The cash flows for three different alternatives are given in table below. Based on AROR analysis,...

    The cash flows for three different alternatives are given in table below. Based on AROR analysis, the best alternative, for a MARR of = 19%, is Alt. A Alt. B Alt. C Initial Cost $5,000 9,000 7,500 Annual Benefits $1,457 2,518 2,133 12.4% ROR 14% 13% Life in years 5 Alt.A Do nothing Alt. C Alt.B

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT