Question

Consumers Energy Inc (CSI) operates a coal fired power plant in Michigan, which has to come...

Consumers Energy Inc (CSI) operates a coal fired power plant in Michigan, which has to come in compliance with nitrogen oxide (NOx) standards by reducing its NOx emissions to 50 tons per year from its current level of 150 tons/year. It is considering the following options to come in compliance.

A)    Install Selective Catalytic Reactor (SCR) on its boiler. SCR reduces NOx emissions by absorbing NOx in exhaust flue gases. SCR requires a capital investment of $600,000 in year zero and has a life of five years. Annual costs of replacing catalysts in the SCR are estimated at $50,000 and other additional operating costs of SCR are estimated at $60,000 per year.

B)    Install lean burners in the boilers. Lean burners reduce the amount of NOx formed during combustion by reducing the air fuel ratio and the operating temperature. The lean burners cost $200,000 to install and have a life of five years. Installing lean burners reduces the efficiency of electricity generation, which results in increased coal consumption in boilers of 5000 tons/year to supply the same amount of electricity. Coal prices are $ 40/ton and expected to remain at that level for the next five years. Lean burners also increase maintenance costs by $8000 per year.

C)    Continue to operate as usual, but buy NOx emission permits from the market each year. The permit prices are expected to be $2500 per ton in year 1 and increase at the rate of 10% year.

Which option should CSI choose? CSI uses a discount rate of 10% in its decisions. The tax rate faced by CSI is 30%. CSI uses a straight line method in charging depreciation and both SCR and Lean burners are expected to have no salvage values. Capital costs are not tax deductible, while operating costs, permit costs and depreciation expenses are tax deductible.

How would your analysis change if the permit prices were expected increase at a rate of 15% per year?

Please show all your intermediate steps and clearly state your assumptions if any.


0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1
Particulars Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
PV of cost           755,422         706,449         804,834
Option 2 is feasible
Option 1
Particulars Year
0 1 2 3 4 5
Capital investment           600,000                     -                       -                       -                       -                         -  
Annual cost of replacing catalyst           60,000           60,000           60,000           60,000              60,000
Operating costs           50,000           50,000           50,000           50,000              50,000
Tax benefit         (69,000)         (69,000)         (69,000)         (69,000)           (69,000)
          600,000           41,000           41,000           41,000           41,000              41,000
Discounting at 10%                  1.00                0.91                0.83                0.75                0.68                  0.62
Capital investment (PV)           600,000           37,273           33,884           30,804           28,004              25,458
PV of cash outflow           755,422
Tax benefit
Particulars Year
0 1 2 3 4 5
Depreciation         120,000         120,000         120,000         120,000           120,000
Other costs         110,000         110,000         110,000         110,000           110,000
        230,000         230,000         230,000         230,000           230,000
Tax savings @ 30%           69,000           69,000           69,000           69,000              69,000
Option 2
Particulars Year
0 1 2 3 4 5
Lean burners cost           200,000                     -                       -                       -                       -                         -  
Cost of increased coal consumption         200,000         200,000         200,000         200,000           200,000
Maintenance cost              8,000              8,000              8,000              8,000                8,000
Tax benefit         (74,400)         (74,400)         (74,400)         (74,400)           (74,400)
          200,000         133,600         133,600         133,600         133,600           133,600
Discounting at 10%                  1.00                0.91                0.83                0.75                0.68                  0.62
Capital investment (PV)           200,000         121,455         110,413         100,376           91,251              82,955
PV of cash outflow           706,449
Tax benefit
Particulars Year
0 1 2 3 4 5
Depreciation           40,000           40,000           40,000           40,000              40,000
Other costs         208,000         208,000         208,000         208,000           208,000
        248,000         248,000         248,000         248,000           248,000
Tax savings @ 30%           74,400           74,400           74,400           74,400              74,400
Option 3
Particulars Year
0 1 2 3 4 5
Permit prices              2,500              2,750              3,025              3,328                3,660
Nox emissions ( From 150 to 50 tons) - A                 100                 100                 100                 100                    100
Cost of compliance         250,000         275,000         302,500         332,750           366,025
Tax benefit         (75,000)         (82,500)         (90,750)         (99,825)         (109,808)
                      -           175,000         195,350         214,875         236,353           259,978
Discounting at 10%                  1.00                0.91                0.83                0.75                0.68                  0.62
Capital investment (PV)                       -           159,091         161,446         161,439         161,432           161,426
PV of cash outflow           804,834
Tax benefit
Particulars Year
0 1 2 3 4 5
Permit costs         250,000         275,000         302,500         332,750           366,025
        250,000         275,000         302,500         332,750           366,025
Tax savings @ 30%           75,000           82,500           90,750           99,825           109,808
Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Consumers Energy Inc (CSI) operates a coal fired power plant in Michigan, which has to come...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • 4. Consumers Energy Inc (CSI) operates a coal fired power plant in Michigan, which has to...

    4. Consumers Energy Inc (CSI) operates a coal fired power plant in Michigan, which has to come in compliance with nitrogen oxide (NOx) standards by reducing its NOx emissions to 50 tons per year from its current level of 150 tons/year. It is considering the following options to come in compliance. A) Install Selective Catalytic Reactor (SCR) on its boiler. SCR reduces NOx emissions by absorbing NOx in exhaust flue gases. SCR requires a capital investment of $600,000 in year...

  • 3. Detroit Edison Power (DE Tort Edison Power (DEP) power plant has to come in compliance...

    3. Detroit Edison Power (DE Tort Edison Power (DEP) power plant has to come in compliance with the new mercury standards bu dards by reducing its current annual mercury emission rate of 300 tons to 100 tons/year. s considering the following options to come in compliance. Assume that regulations are likely to change after four years so DEP planning only for next 4 years. It is considering the following a. Install Elu install Flue gas scrubbers (EGS) on its boiler...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT