Describe who (in a medical office setting) is permitted to release information to in an emergency situation and in a non-emergency situation based on PHIA and why. Remember to discuss confidentiality, power of attorney, and guardianship. Use evidence found in literature to support your ideas by citing the references.
Medical emergencies may not be common in the office setting, but that's precisely why you need to practice your response to them. For many years, common medical practice meant that physicians made decisions for their patients. This paternalistic view has gradually been supplanted by one promoting patient autonomy, whereby patients and doctors share the decision-making responsibility. Consequently doctor-patient relationships are very different now than they were just a few decades ago. However, conflicts still abound as the medical community and those it serves struggle to define their respective roles.
The Personal Health Information Act (PHIA) came into force on December 11, 1997 and governs the collection, use, disclosure, retention, disposal and destruction of personal health information. The act recognizes both the right of individuals to protect their personal health information and the need of health information trustees to collect, use and disclose personal health information to provide, support and manage health care.
Personal health information is any information that:
For the most part, the Act focuses on the obligations of trustees in dealing with personal health information. The Act divides trustees into four categories:
The Act also imposes duties on information managers (who are hired by trustees to process, store or destroy personal health information, or to manage or service information systems) as well as employees of trustees.
The Act defines “health care facility” as:
A trustee’s obligations fall into two main categories.
The Act puts in statutory form the common-law right of an individual to access his or her own personal health information. There are three elements to this right:
Under the changes to PHIA, a trustee is required to provide individuals with notice of their right to examine and receive a copy of their personal health information and how they can exercise this right. The notice must also state that an individual has the right to authorize another person to examine and receive a copy of their personal health information.
A trustee must use a sign, poster, brochure or other similar type of means to provide this notice to individuals. This notice must be prominently displayed in as many locations and in such numbers as the trustee reasonably considers adequate to ensure that the information is likely to come to the individuals’ attention.
The Act imposes on trustees an obligation to assist an individual in gaining access to his or her personal health information. Trustees are to respond to access requests “without delay, openly, accurately and completely.” Upon request, trustees must provide an explanation of any terms, codes or abbreviations that the individual does not understand.
The Act permits trustees to withhold personal health information that falls into certain restricted categories. For example, access to personal health information may be refused if:
Even when trustees are allowed to refuse access to portions of an individual’s personal health information, they still have an obligation to allow access to those portions of the individual’s personal health information that are not exempted by the Act.
Trustees must respond to requests for access as promptly as required in the circumstances but no later than
A failure to respond within the required time frame will be considered a refusal to permit access.
The Act gives an individual the right to obtain a copy of any
personal health information he or she is entitled to examine.
An individual has a right to point out information he or she believes is incorrect and to ask the trustee to correct it. It is up to the trustee to decide whether a correction is needed. A trustee has 30 days to investigate the issue and make a decision about the request for a correction.
If the trustee agrees to the correction, the mistaken information should be stroked out (not erased) and the correct information added or cross-referenced in a way that anyone reading the record would be aware of it.
If the individual and the trustee disagree about a correction, the individual has a right to file a statement of disagreement, which must be attached to and form part of his or her health record.
A trustee must pass on the correction or the statement of disagreement to anyone to whom the personal health information has been disclosed over the previous year.
All rights of an individual may be exercised by a representative of
that individual. The Act identifies several representatives,
including:
If a person is incapacitated and no individual described above is available the first adult listed below who is readily available and willing to exercise the person’s rights under PHIA:
The individual’s spouse, or common-law partner, with whom the individual is cohabiting;
No one other than the individual the personal health information is about, that individual’s representative or, if the person is incapacitated and no representative is available, a person authorized as outlined above has a right to access his or her personal health information. A request for access to personal health information by anyone other than the individual or the individual’s representative must be assessed under the provisions of the Act dealing with use and disclosure of personal health information.
A trustee’s obligations, as set out in the Act, affect the:
A trustee has three main duties when collecting personal health
information:
Determining the purpose for collecting personal health information
is a critical requirement of the Act. The Act requires trustees to
notify the individual of this purpose at the time the information
is collected. Besides meeting this statutory obligation,
identifying the purpose for the collection will help determine what
information can be collected and how it can later be used.
The purpose for collecting personal
health information will depend on the function of the particular
facility as well as the circumstances in which the collection takes
place. For example, a psychiatric facility is likely to collect
personal health information for a different purpose than the
emergency ward of a hospital. The personal health information
needed when an individual comes to a clinic for an inoculation will
likely be different from what is needed when someone enters a
personal care home.
This requirement is based on the principle that an individual has a right to make decisions about his or her own health care. Informing the individual as fully as possible about the reasons for collecting personal health information will allow him or her to make an informed decision about providing personal health information. This principle is so important that the Act requires that, when personal health information is collected by someone who is not a health professional, he or she must advise the individual about someone who can be contacted to gain more information about the purposes for collecting the information.
Stressing the need to respect individual privacy, the Act generally permits the collection from individuals of only as much information as is needed for specific purposes. What a trustee needs to know will largely depend on his or her purpose in collecting personal health information. The Act prohibits the collection of personal health information for:
The Act requires that, whenever possible, trustees must collect personal health information directly from the individual the information is about.
This rule serves at least three important purposes:
The Act permits collection from other sources (including other
trustees) in specified circumstances. For example, it is
permissible to do so when the individual has authorized it, when
circumstances do not permit collection of the information from the
person, or when the information supplied by the individual is
likely to be inaccurate. For a complete list of exceptions.
For the purposes of The Personal Health Information Act, “use” refers to what is done with the personal health information within the trustee organization. “Disclosure” involves revealing personal health information outside the trustee organization to other trustees, to the individual’s friends and family or to other individuals. Both use and disclosure involve revealing the information to someone. This may be done by permitting others to read it, sending it to them by mail, fax, or e-mail, or by revealing the information orally.
Trustees cannot use or disclose personal health information unless:
There are some exceptions to this general rule. For example, trustees may use personal health information for a purpose directly related to the purpose for which it was collected. In some cases, personal health information may be disclosed without the individual’s consent as it is required to provide health care or for specific humanitarian purposes such as contacting the relative or friend of someone who is ill or injured, informing relatives of someone’s death, and assisting in identifying a deceased person.
Trustees may also use or disclose personal health information to prevent or ease a serious and immediate threat to the mental or physical health or safety of the individual, another individual or the public.
Trustees may disclose to a person’s immediate family or a close personal friend information about the care that the person is current receiving as a patient or resident in a health care facility if the disclosure is made in accordance with good medical and other professional practice and the trustee reasonably believes the disclosure to be acceptable to the person.
In addition, trustees may disclose information where such disclosure is authorized or required by an enactment of Manitoba or Canada. For example, The Gunshot and Stabwounds Mandatory Reporting Act, whichcame into force on December 1, 2008 requires a health care facility to report to police gunshot and stab wounds treated by the facility.
Health care facilities may use or disclose personal health information without consent:
Health Care Facilities may also disclose information to:
A religious
organization, unless asked by the individual NOT to share this
information. The only information that can be shared would be the
individual’s name, general health status and location in the
facility.
A charitable fundraising foundation associated
with the facility, unless the patient tells the facility not to.
The only information that can be shared would be the name and
mailing address of any patients or residents or former patients or
residents.
Describe who (in a medical office setting) is permitted to release information to in an emergency...
Yicheng Wong is a 53-year-old widowed Asian male who comes to see you in your office after he was hospitalized for 14 days for a manic episode. Yicheng has bipolar I disorder. He is currently prescribed 1500 mg of divalproex sodium (Depakote ER). He is 5’ 11” and 210 lbs. His most recent VPA level was 45 µg/ml. Questions From your perspective as Yicheng’s psychiatric nurse practitioner, answer the following questions in a paper no longer than two double-spaced pages...
Mr. J. is a 30-year-old electrical line worker brought to the emergency department by ambulance. Emergency medical service (EMS) personnel report that he was in a cherry picker which came in contact with an overhead 70,000-volt power line. He was unconsciousness at the scene, was apneic and intubated by EMS. On presentation to the ED, Mr. J. is noted to have areas of black charring on his right arm, axilla, and upper thighs. Issue Identification. Based on the above description...
The Jayhawk Medical Center uses an electronic health record (EHR) certified by the Office of the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology. To demonstrate nursing’s contribution to patient care, the chief nursing officer supports the Council for Nursing Informatics and provides trained informatics nurses to help the Council achieve the goals of safe patient care and quality nursing data. Jayhawk Medical Center is a Magnet hospital and is actively engaged in a patient safety program, including National Database for Nursing...
BACKGROUND INFORMATION The client is a 46-year-old white male who works as a welder at a local steel fabrication factory. He presents today after being referred by his PCP after a trip to the emergency room in which he felt he was having a heart attack. He stated that he felt chest tightness, shortness of breath, and feeling of impending doom. He does have some mild hypertension (which is treated with low sodium diet) and is about 15 lbs. overweight....
A 45-year-old homeless man who abuses alcohol presents to the emergency department with fever and cough of 4-day duration. The cough is productive with thick, bloody phlegm. He complains of pain in the right side of his chest with coughing or taking a deep breath. He denies any other medical history and says he cannot remember the last time he saw a doctor. He does not smoke cigarettes but says he drinks a pint of whiskey whenever he can get...
CARE PLAN DEHYDRATION Charles West, a 70 y/o man was brought to the Emergency Department at 4:30 AM by his wife. She told the emergency room triage nurse that he has a lot of "dark red" diarrhea for the past 3 days and last night. When he became very dizzy, disoriented and weak this morning, she decided to bring him to the hospital. Mr. West's vital signs were B/P 70/- (diastolic blood pressure inaudible) Pulse 110 weak and easily obliterated,...
PART 1 Introduction to Medical Assisting 12 Grade Name: Date: MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. The branch of law concerned with issues of citizen Scenario for questions 6 and 7: A man is found lying unconscious outside the physician's office. You alert several colleagues, who go outside to assess the man's condition. It is clear that he will be unable to sign a consent form for treatment. welfare and safety is: a. private law b. criminal law c. constitutional law d. administrative...
n the Ohio case Biddle v. Warren General Hospital, a number of patients brought a lawsuit against Warren General Hospital and a law firm, alleging the hospital unlawfully disclosed patients’ confidential medical information so that the law firm could search for potential Supplemental Security Income (SSI) eligibility for the payment of the patients’ unpaid medical bills. The Supreme Court of Ohio, through the opinion of Justice Resnick, held that (1.) an independent tort exists for the unauthorized, unprivileged disclosure to...
Entering and Contracting Contracting at Charity Medical Center Charity Medical Center (CMC), a five hundred-bed acute-care hospital, was part of the Jefferson Hospital Corporation (JHC). JHC, which operated several long-term and acute-care facilities and was sponsored by a large religious organization, had recently been formed and was trying to establish accounting and finance, materials management, and human resources systems to manage and coordinate the different facilities of particular concern to CMC, however, was a market share that had been declining...
Please remember you need to include APA format references for these discussions. The bruises were large and ugly, and 4-month-old Amber Miller was covered with them. The worst of the 15 bruises were on her head and chest. Dr. Lauren Stephenson raised her eyebrows at the emergency room nurse; the nurse grimaced. “The parents said she’s been fussy and vomiting for three days. This morning, the mother found her unconscious in her crib. Should I call social services?” Dr. Stephenson...