Answer to 1st Image :
Answer : "D" : A peremptory challenge
Remarks : In American law, the attorneys are given a right to reject a certain number of potential jurors without stating a reason. This right is known as the right of peremptory challenge.
Answer to 2nd Image :
Answer : "D" : Depositions and other devices
Remarks : Parties in a legal law suit engage in discovery through either written discovery like requesting for documents or through oral discovery like depositions.
Answer to 3rd Image :
Answer : "B" : Information that is relevant to the case
Remarks : The only legitimate reason to be able to examine documents in possession of defendant is if they are relevant to the case. No court will allow examination of documents which are privelleged or not relevant to the case.
Answer to 4th Image :
Answer : "B" : A Deposition
Remarks : A deposition involves the attorney for both sides, the person being put under oath for examination and a court official for recording the questions asked by the attorney to the person under oath.
OOOOO Sportsfield Inc. files a suit against Tailgate Services. Before the trial, during the jury selection...
Write a summary of this paragraph, in your own words. Jury Selection Before a jury trial commences, a panel of jurors must be selected. Although some types of trials require twelve-person juries, most civil matters can be heard by six-person juries. The jury selection process is known as voir dire.Footnote In most jurisdictions, attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendant ask prospective jurors oral questions to determine whether they are biased or have any connection with a party to the...
Question 11 1 pts Renewable Resources, Inc., files a suit against Sunrich Utility Company and seeks to examine certain documents in Sunrich's possession. A legitimate reason for this examination is that the documents contain O private information about Sunrich's operations. irrelevant data that can be eliminated from consideration. O public information about energy generation. information that is relevant to the case. Question 12 1 pts To prepare for a trial between SmartPhones, Inc., and TechApps Company, TechApps' attorney places SmartPhones'...
Ballpark Sportsfield, Inc., files a suit against Concessions & Tailgate Services. The document that informs Concessions & Tailgate that it must file an answer within a specified time period is o the complaint the answer O the writ of certiorari. the summons. 1 pts Question 2 Gilbert wants to initiate a suit against Healthways Insurance Company by filing a complaint. The complaint should include O a statement alleging the facts showing the court has jurisdiction. O a motion for judgment...
Neville files a suit against Olina. To obtain information to prepare for trial, the parties engage in discovery. This includes gaining access to each other’s witnesses and other types of evidence by a. voir dire, the rule of four, and a writ of certiorari. b. chicanery, subterfuge, and similar methods. c. undue harassment, improper requests, and related tactics. d. depositions, interrogatories, and other procedural devices. Ethics has to do with how a business person making business decisions applies a. financial...
22. Early in the trial of Fuel Corporation's suit against Gas Stations, Inc., the attorneys engage in voir dire. This is a. b. c. A hearing before the judge to determine the legal issues to be argued. A review by both attorneys of the evidentiary exhibits. A proceeding for selection of jurors. d. Opening statements 23. Irma files a suit against Jim. In order to obtain a favorable jury verdict, Irma must prove her case a. Beyond a reasonable doubt....
Question 3 1 pt: In Coastal Fishing Company's suit against Dockside Marina, Inc., the jury returns a verdict in Coastal's favor. Dockside files a motion stating that even if the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to Coastal, a reasonable jury should not have found in its favor. This is a motion for O a new trial. O a judgment in accordance with the verdict. O judgment n.o.v. O a judgment on the pleadings. Question 4 1 pts...
Case Study Analysis: Fred Stern & Company, Inc. (Knapp): In the business world of the Roaring Twenties, the schemes and scams of flimflam artists and confidence men were legendary. The absence of a strong regulatory system at the federal level to police the securities markets—the Securities and Exchange Commission was not established until 1934—aided, if not encouraged, financial frauds of all types. In all likelihood, the majority of individuals involved in business during the 1920s were scrupulously honest. Nevertheless, the...