Discuss the major components of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Corporate Governance?
Counterpoint: According to Romano (2004), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), in which Congress introduced a series of corporate governance initiatives into the federal securities laws are not just a considerable change in law but also a departure in the mode of regulation. The federal regime had until then consisted of disclosure requirements, rather than substantive corporate governance mandates, which were traditionally left to state corporate law and were not part of the federal securities regime. Federal courts had, enforced such a view of the regime’s strictures, by characterizing efforts of the SEC to extend its domain into substantive corporate governance as beyond its jurisdiction.
1. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, introduced in 2002 to restore investors' confidence in accounting practices after a number of corporate scandals, consists of a total of 11 titles of which 4 are major.
First title is the creation of Public company accounting oversight board (PCAOB) which governs public accounting firms.
Second title describes Auditor Independence.
Third Title discusses about Corporate Responsibility such as mandating Audit Committee for issuers.
The Fourth Title elaborates on Enhanced Financial Disclosures.
The other titles mentioned in the Act are Declaration to address conflicts of interest, penalties for white collar crime, corporate tax reforms, corporate and criminal fraud accountability and SEC Powers and authority.
2. Corporate Governance is a system in which the Board of Directors in the interests of the stakeholders, directs and governs for more transparency and better management.
Discuss the major components of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Corporate Governance? Counterpoint: According to...
US Sarbanes-Oxley Act passed in the wake of a myriad of corporate scandals. What these scandals had in common was skew reporting of selected financial transactions. For example, companies such as Enron, WorldCom and Tyco, covered up or misrepresented a variety of questionable transactions, resulting in huge losses to stakeholders and a crisis in investor confidence. Sarbanes-Oxley aims to enhance corporate governance and strengthen corporate accountability. Has SOX live up to its expectations over the last decade, and should there...
In 200 words or more, Describe how the Sarbanes-Oxley Act affects corporate governance. Give an example
Topic: Financial scandal that took place prior to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 Question: What led to the scandal from a management ethics point of view, did management encourage the manipulation of financial data, did they just look the other way, did they cover it up, etc. Was there any corporate governance?
7. Ethical corporate behavior and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Most executives believe that they and their firms behave in an ethical manner and that it is in their best interests to do so. How can a firm's ethical conduct increase its long-term profitability? Ethical corporate behavior builds public trust and encourages the use of good corporate governance. Both increase the likelihood that creditors and investors will want to invest in the firm, which in turn increases the availability of financial capital....