Harwell, Inc. produces two different products, Product A and Product B. Harwell uses a traditional volume-based costing system in which direct labor hours are the allocation base. Harwell is considering switching to an ABC system by splitting its manufacturing overhead cost of $850,000 across three activities: Setup, Production, and Finishing. Under the traditional volume-based costing system, the predetermined overhead rate is $8.50/direct labor hour. Under the ABC system, the rate for each activity and usage of the activity drivers are as follows:
Activity Rate | Usage by Product A | Usage by Product B | |||||||
Setup (Batches) | $ | 100 | /hour | 330 | 170 | ||||
Production (Direct Labor Hours) | $ | 3.00 | 49,000 | 51,000 | |||||
Finishing (Machine Hours) | $ | 1,220 | 56 | 440 | |||||
Required:
a. Calculate the indirect manufacturing costs assigned to
Product A under the traditional costing system.
b. Calculate the indirect manufacturing costs
assigned to Product B under the traditional costing
system.
c. Calculate the indirect manufacturing costs
assigned to Product A under the ABC system.
d. Calculate the indirect manufacturing costs
assigned to Product B under the ABC system.
e. Which product is under-costed and which is
over-costed under the volume-based cost system compared to
ABC?
a.
Indirect manufacturing costs assigned to product A under the traditional costing system = Number of direct labor hours of A X Overhead rate = 49,000 X 8.5 = $ 416,500
b.
Indirect manufacturing costs assigned to product B under the traditional costing system = Number of direct labor hours of B X Overhead rate = 51,000 X 8.5 = $ 433,500
c.
Indirect manufacturing costs assigned to product A under the ABC system
Cost | Driver | Rate | Usage by A | Amount |
Setup | Batches | $ 100 | 330 | $ 33,000 |
Production | Direct Labor Hours | $ 3 | 49000 | $ 147,000 |
Finishing | Machine Hours | $ 1,220 | 56 | $ 68,320 |
$ 248,320 |
d.
Cost | Driver | Rate | Usage by B | Amount |
Setup | Batches | $ 100 | 170 | $ 17,000 |
Production | Direct Labor Hours | $ 3 | 51000 | $ 153,000 |
Finishing | Machine Hours | $ 1,220 | 440 | $ 536,800 |
$ 706,800 |
e.
As compared to ABC Product A is overcosted and B is undercosted
Harwell, Inc. produces two different products, Product A and Product B. Harwell uses a traditional volume-based...
Harwell, Inc. produces two different products, Product A and Product B. Harwell uses a traditional volume-based costing system in which direct labor hours are the allocation base. Harwell is considering switching to an ABC system by splitting its manufacturing overhead cost of $750,000 across three activities: Setup, Production, and Finishing. Under the traditional volume-based costing system, the predetermined overhead rate is $7.50/direct labor hour. Under the ABC system, the rate for each activity and usage of the activity drivers are...
Carter, Inc. produces two different products, Product A and Product B. Carter uses a traditional volume-based costing system in which direct labor hours are the allocation base. Carter is considering switching to an ABC system by splitting its manufacturing overhead cost of $783,000 across three activities: Design, Production, and Inspection. Under the traditional volume-based costing system, the predetermined overhead rate is $2.61/direct labor hour. Under the ABC system, the rate for each activity and usage of the activity drivers are...
Sherwin Williams uses traditional volume based costing to determine its product costs. This is the method we learned in chapter 3 Job Order Costing. Currently, Sherwin Williams allocates overhead based on direct labor hours. The company estimated 10,000 direct labor hours and total overhead of $1,970,000 for the year. They have determined the following activity cost pools for overhead cost. Overhead Activities Machine setup $950,000 Material handling $820,000 Machine operation $200,000 Total $1,970,000 Note: Activity cost pools aren’t necessary for...
Problem 7-16 Comparing Traditional and Activity-Based Product Margins [LO7-1, LO7-3, LO7-4, LO7-5) Hi-Tek Manufacturing, Inc., makes two types of Industrial component parts--the B300 and the T500. An absorption costing income statement for the most recent period is shown: Hi-Tek Manufacturing Inc. Income Statement Sales $ 1,697,400 Cost of goods sold 1,230,193 Gross margin 467,207 Selling and administrative expenses 640,000 net operating loss $ (172,793) Hi-Tek produced and sold 60,300 units of B300 at a price of $20 per unit and...
Houston Company produces two products. Standard and Jumbo, and currently uses a costing system that accumulates all overhead costs in a single cost pool and assigns it to products based on direct labor dollars. After completing a study that showed overhead costs were driven by factors other than volume, Houston's management has decided to implement an activity based costing (ABC) system. The study showed that manufacturing overhead costs could be associated with three activities: (1) purchasing. (2) receiving, and (3)...
Problem 7-16 Comparing Traditional and Activity-Based Product Margins [LO7-1, L07-3, LO7-4, LO7-5) Hi-Tek Manufacturing, Inc., makes two types of industrial component parts--the B300 and the T500. An absorption costing income statement for the most recent period is shown boints $ Hi-Tek Manufacturing Inc. Income Statement Sales Cost of goods sold Gross margin Selling and administrative expenses Net operating loss 1,716.00 1,212,566 503.434 560.000 (56,566) Hi-Tek produced and sold 60,200 units of B300 at a price of $20 per unit and...
Problem 7-16 Comparing Traditional and Activity-Based Product Margins [LO7-1, LO7-3, LO7-4, LO7-5] Hi-Tek Manufacturing, Inc., makes two types of industrial component parts-the B300 and the T500. An absorption costing income statement for the most recent period is shown: Hi-Tek Manufacturing Inc. Income Statement Sales 1,749,600 1,233,208 516,392 590,000 (73,608) Cost of goods sold Gross margin Selling and administrative expenses Net operating loss Hi-Tek produced and sold 60,100 units of B300 at a price of $21 per unit and 12,500 units...
Problem 7-16 Comparing Traditional and Activity-Based Product Margins [LO7-1, LO7-3, LO7-4, LO7-5] Hi-Tek Manufacturing, Inc., makes two types of industrial component parts—the B300 and the T500. An absorption costing income statement for the most recent period is shown: Hi-Tek Manufacturing Inc. Income Statement Sales $ 1,708,000 Cost of goods sold 1,228,693 Gross margin 479,307 Selling and administrative expenses 550,000 Net operating loss $ (70,693 ) Hi-Tek produced and sold 60,000 units of B300 at a price of $20 per unit...
Bunker makes two types of briefcase, fabric and leather. The company is currently using a traditional costing system with labor hours as the cost driver but is considering switching to an activity-based costing system. In preparation for the possible switch, Bunker has identified two activity cost pools: materials handling and setup. Pertinent data follow. Number of labor hours Number of material moves Number of setupe Fabric Case Leather Case 16,000 9.000 820 1,230 91 169 Total estimated overhead costs are...
Company used to consider a traditional costing system based on machine hours; however, they are currently considering an activity-based costing (ABC) approach. The company estimates the usage of 50,000 direct labor hours (DLH) and 30,000 machine hours (MH) for the current year. The following data show the budgeted manufacturing overhead (OH): Activity center Cost driver Activity driver Cost Material handling # of parts handled 6,000,000 $720,000 Setup costs # of setups 750 $315,000 Machining costs # of machine hours 30,000...