Year Nominal GDP (billions of current $) Inflation rate Population (millions) 2014 3754 117 2% 1%...
Year Inflation rate Nominal GDP (billions of current $) 3754 2014 2015 2016 Population (millions) 79 83 88 L 2% 2% 1% 3898 3919 Using the information in the table above, calculate economic growth for 2015. Give your answer to two decimal places, 1st attempt
Year Nominal GDP(Billions of current dollars Real GDP(Billions of dollars of 2009) 2013 16,691.50 15,612.20 2014 17,393.10 15,982.30 2015 18,036.60 16,397.20 2016 18,569.10 16,662.10 Compute the rate of growth of the economy (use real GDP), and briefly comment on your results. -Between 2013 and 2014 -Between 2014 and 2015 -Between 2015 and 2016 Which one is more important: Nominal GDP or Real GDP? Explain Why.
GDP deflator Year Nominal GDP Population Size ($ billions (millions 2008 3,275 310 2009 3,400 312 2010 3,350 314 Table L: Economic Data for a Hypothetical Economy 104 107 109 119. Consider the economic data provided for a hypothetical economy in Table L above. What is the real GDP growth rate from 2008-09 for the economy depicted in Table L? (If necessary, at each stage of calculation, round to the nearest 1/100th (0.00).) A. -3.39% B. -3.28% C. -1.47% D....
Reference equation: Real GDP per capita growth rate Nominal GDP per capita growth rate - Inflation rate - Population growth rate This equation is an approximation of the exact rate of growth of GDP per capita, and so it results in some errors when calculating this rate. However, the simplified equation both is easy to use and results in small error terms when inflation, nominal GDP growth, and population growth are low, and so it is a useful approximation. The...
Consider the following data on U.S. GDP: Year 2014 2015 GDP (Billions of current dollars) (Billions of 2012 dollars) 17,521.7 16,899.8 18,219.3 17,386.7 18,707.2 17,659.2 19,485.4 18,050.7 20,494.1 18,566.4 2016 2017 2018 Source: "National Economic Accounts."U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. The percentage change in nominal GDP from 2014 to 2015 was The percentage change in real GDP from 2017 to 2018 was True or False: The percentage change in real GDP from 2017 to 2018 was higher than the percentage...
Reference equation: Real GDP per capita growth rate = Nominal GDP per capita growth rate - Inflation rate - Population growth rateThis equation is an approximation of the exact rate of growth of GDP per capita, and so it results in some errors when calculating this rate. However, the simplified equation both is easy to use and results in small error terms when inflation, nominal GDP growth, and population growth are low, and so it is a useful approximation. The...
Based on the table below, calculate nominal GDP, real GDP, the GDP deflator, and the inflation rate in each year and fill in the missing parts of the table. Use 2014 as the base year. Instructions: Round nominal and real GDP values to two decimal places. Round GDP deflator and inflation rate values to the nearest whole number. Price of Quantity of Price of orange ($) Quantity of oranges 700 beach balls beach ball Nominal GDP ($) Real GDP ($)...
1. Consider the data below: Date GDP Deflator Population Growth Rate Nominal GDP (billions) $16,015.40 $16,670.20 $16,324.50 $16,680.60 2010 2011 2012 2013 1.8% 104.62 106.12 107.44 108.98 1.7% .98% Compute economic growth rates for the US for 2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13.
1. Consider the data below: Date Nominal GDP (billions) GDP Deflator Population Growth Rate 2010 $16,015.40 104.62 2011 $16,670.20 106.12 1.8% 2012 $16,324.50 107.44 1.7% 2013 $16,680.60 108.98 .98% Compute economic growth rates for the US for 2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13.
Reference equation: Real GDP per capita growth rate = Nominal GDP per capita growth rate-inflation rate-Population growth rate This equation is an approximation of the exact rate of growth of GDP per capita, and so it results in some errors when caloulating this rate. However, the smplified equation is both easy to use and results in small error terms when inflation, nominal GDP growth, and population growth are low, and so it is a useful approximation. The table below lists...