Question

[Consider going back to this paragraph’s main idea before ending it. All in all, what do these points prove about infection control technology?]

The efficacy of medical treatment has become significantly better and life-saving. Many controlling measures have been compressed into one technology, which makes it cost-effective, e.g., disinfectant rooms have pressured air to maintain temperature as well as keep the microorganisms at bay. Another example of cost-effectiveness is the PCT tests, and they also play a crucial role in treating sepsis once diagnosed. A test or workflow with intelligence sharing is essential for reducing sepsis complications and costs. The robotic surgical system has increased the precision and allows smaller incisions, which reduce the chances of infection. The use of clothed foot covers and machines that stick plastic sheets on shoes has also decreased the spread of diseases. The use of anti-bacterial handwash reduces the chances of hospital infections if followed correctly. Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) programs can kill bacteria that manual processes have failed to remove.

Answer 1

Infection control technology is more efficacious and cost effective as chances of infection and related complications have reduced significantly.