Question

Abstract 1. Brennenstuhl S and Fuller-Thomson E. 2015. The painful legacy of childhood violence: Migraine headaches...

Abstract 1. Brennenstuhl S and Fuller-Thomson E. 2015. The painful legacy of childhood violence: Migraine headaches among adult survivors of adverse childhood experiences. Headache 2015;55:973-83.

Background.—Childhood adversities have been associated with adult migraine in the general population. However, most research has focused on only a few types of maltreatment and has not always controlled for factors correlated with early adversities and migraine. Objectives.—The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between early adversities and migraine, while controlling for a range of potential explanatory factors. Methods.—We analyzed data from the 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey – Mental Health. Using a representative sample of 10,358 men and 12,638 women, we undertook gender-specific logistic regression analyses to determine the association between number and type of self-reported childhood adversities (physical abuse, sexual abuse, and witnessing parental domestic violence) and migraine, while controlling for sociodemographics, comorbid adversities, health behaviors, depression, and anxiety. Results.—In total, 6.5% of men and 14.2% of women reported migraines. All three adversities were significantly associated with migraine for both genders, even after controlling for a range of variables. The fully adjusted odds of migraine associated with physical abuse, parental domestic violence, and sexual abuse were 1.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.42-1.83), 1.64 (95% CI = 1.39-1.93), and 1.32 (95% CI = 1.11-1.57), respectively, for women, and 1.50 (95% CI = 1.25-1.80), 1.52 (95% CI = 1.16-1.98), and 1.70 (95% CI = 1.22-2.36) for men. Greater number of adversities was also associated with increasing odds of migraine. Men reporting all three adversities had over three times (odds ratio = 3.26; 95% CI = 2.09-5.07) and women over two times (OR = 2.85; 95% CI = 2.25-3.60) the odds of migraine compared with those without childhood adversities. Conclusions.—Number and type of early adversities are associated with migraine among Canadian men and women.

Which study design was used?

a

Nested Case control

b

Case-control

c

Cross-sectional

d

Ecological

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Case control study as this is were it is the observational study in which two existing groups differing in the outcome are identified and compared on the basis of supposed casual attribute.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Abstract 1. Brennenstuhl S and Fuller-Thomson E. 2015. The painful legacy of childhood violence: Migraine headaches...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Abstract 1. Brennenstuhl S and Fuller-Thomson E. 2015. The painful legacy of childhood violence: Migraine headaches...

    Abstract 1. Brennenstuhl S and Fuller-Thomson E. 2015. The painful legacy of childhood violence: Migraine headaches among adult survivors of adverse childhood experiences. Headache 2015;55:973-83. Background.—Childhood adversities have been associated with adult migraine in the general population. However, most research has focused on only a few types of maltreatment and has not always controlled for factors correlated with early adversities and migraine. Objectives.—The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between early adversities and migraine, while controlling for...

  • Please read and answer the following questions. 1. How was the sample selected ? We’re demographics...

    Please read and answer the following questions. 1. How was the sample selected ? We’re demographics collected ? 2. Is the sample representative of the target population? If not how was the sample “improved “ to make the results more reliable and valid? 3. What is the design of the study? 4. How were the human subjects protected ? 5. Were instruments used reliable and valid ? Did they measure the phenomenon under the study( how do you know that...

  • Using the book, write another paragraph or two: write 170 words: Q: Compare the assumptions of...

    Using the book, write another paragraph or two: write 170 words: Q: Compare the assumptions of physician-centered and collaborative communication. How is the caregiver’s role different in each model? How is the patient’s role different? Answer: Physical-centered communication involves the specialists taking control of the conversation. They decide on the topics of discussion and when to end the process. The patient responds to the issues raised by the caregiver and acts accordingly. On the other hand, Collaborative communication involves a...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT