Question

What are the elements of the cause of action in negligence, in Ms. Hoffman case who was admitted to the hospital with an order for a renal arteriogram?

Answer 1

ANS) MS.Hoffman was admitted to the hospital with an command for a renal arteriogram.After her admittance, to the hospital,MS Hoffman was given with a agreement form for strategy.The strategy form recorded around 5 radiologists on the form but don't state which radiologist would carry out this strategies to her.Mainly the catalogue of radiologists was mainly made of participants of the pinehurst radiology section.

-- This section will control which radiologist will encrust the hospital every day.Dr Lina was allocated to function Hoffman's strategies .Ensuring the arteriogram ,the doctor had decided that an angioplasty was mandatory.There is important proof that the radiologist was in mistake and that angioplasty was not mandatory.A single part of proof shows that the employee radiology subordinate made an mistake in his findings of an EKG.

-- This mistake was made by juan Tannamedda,one hourly staff of the hospital.It recorded the patient as Hoffman but the experiment displayed and was absolutely worked out on a patient named Huffman.In any occasion,the angioplasty was executed and because of little problems at the time of strategies , the patient want to be changed to an another hospital.

-- Her situation worsen in around 30 days of time and occasionally she had missed important motor functions.She had took a great rest on the bed.The Dr.Lina was having only reduced advantages the hospital.precisely, she was involved in the pinehurst section or community,gives her own medical wrongdoing insurance and just done the anesthesia or another act of assistance with the advantages of the hospital.

THANKS!!!!!!