In this case court had ordered the decision according to the four D's of negligence. These four D's explain the physician or health care profession doing negligence in the clinical settings in providing care or doing critical procedure.
The first of the four D's states the role of nurse after they had been committed with nurse patient relationship, they are responsible for their every basic care, they are required to get the consent from the client whenever its necessary. It mostly refers to the "Duty" of the health profession.
The second 'D' explains the quality and the standard of the care provided to the client by the health care professionals accorsing to the state guidelines and the hospital protocol. It would be referred as "dereliction"
The third and the fourth 'D' explain the health care profession crossing their limits and end up in severe injury to the client by their known mistakes. This attitude may leads to severe suffering of the client, that is "damage" to the client .
Here the court decision had been made according to the third and fourth D's of negligence and the client had won the case.
Discussion Question #3: During an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) -- a gallbladder x-ray that requires injection...
A woman trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) worked as the office manager for an insurance business. When her coworker at the next desk had a heart attack and fell to the floor, the office manager began CPR and shouted for others in the room to dial 911. The department supervisor came running and told the office manager to stop CPR. She reluctantly obeyed. Emergency medical technicians arrived, but the heart attack victim died. 8. The victim's husband sued the supervisor,...