Use the above record label and band scenario. After coming to an agreement in principle, the record label seemingly reneges on the decision to share the merchandising royalties evenly. The band is infuriated and also very worried about the value of the contract without those additional payments. However, they don't want to sue - they are happy with the rest of the contract and have spent significant time working out a promotional and creative strategy that they're very excited about executing with the label. Given the situation, they consider two options for dispute resolution: arbitration and mediation. Which should they choose and why? What is a risk of that choice?
MEDIATION- THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Mediation is an effective tool in settling disputes in which a third party neutral (mediator) assists the parties to resolve their conflict. Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution in which two people or parties meet out of court to resolve their argument with the help of the mediator.
REASONS FOR CHOOSING MEDIATION FOR DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
There are so many benefits in using mediation as a dispute resolution mechanism;
RISKS INVOLVED IN MEDIATION
Use the above record label and band scenario. After coming to an agreement in principle, the...