Fraud : An intentional act by one or more individuals among management, TCWG, employees, third parties, involving the use of deception to obtain an unjust or illegal advantage.
The primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both, those charged with governance of management & entity. Auditor is responsible for obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial statements taken or presented to him as a whole are free from material misstatements. Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements of the financial statements may not be detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with the standards set.
The Auditors should exercise professional skepticism during audit. they should perform their audit applying all knowledge they possess and also with an independent mindset. The auditor shall be liable only if inadequacies resulted from their side during performance of their audit which resulted in failure to detect fraud. The Auditors do not prepare the financials.. they prepare them, audit them from the books of accounts presented before them by the management and personnel.
Primarily, whether an auditor is responsible for fraud or not will depend on the fact that whether failure to detect fraud was due to shortcomings in auditor's work.
An auditor is just responsible to form an opinion that whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatements whether due to fraud or error. He/she exercises all the standards set in performing such an audit. He provides a reasonable assurance & not an absolute level of assurance. The assurance provided by the auditor does not guarantee for future of an Enterprise though.. It only states that as at a particular date, the financials provided by management are free from material misstatements subject to inherent limitations of an audit. The fraud detected later will be the responsibility of an auditor only if there are possibilities, circumstances that the fraud could have been identified by the auditor's procedures adopted.
Why aren't auditors responsible to detect fraud in many cases? Should they be? Why or why...
The public generally recognizes that it is very difficult for auditors to detect fraud, and therefore tend to not hold auditors accountable when auditors fall to detect some fraud. True False
The auditor's professional standards hold auditors responsible for detection if a fraud is concealed by fraudulent documents True False
A major difference between auditors and fraud examiners is that most auditors __________________. Fraud examiners and forensic accountants who detect fraud go 6 of 10 beyond this. They determine whether __________________, whether expenditures make sense, and whether all aspects of the documentation are in order. A. Are not trained in detecting fraud; red flags exist B. Merely match documents to numbers to see whether support exists and is adequate; the documents are real or fraudulent C. Have at least a...
In cases of fraud, what is the auditor responsible for? Was the audit firm, Ernst & Young, deficient in its audit?
Benford's Law is a probability rule frequently used by accounting auditors to detect systematic fraud. It states that approximately 12.7% of numbers will begin with the number 2. An auditor decides to investigate a particular firm further if a sample proportion of their invoices, with the invoiced number beginning with a 2, is in the highest 0.5% of all possible sample proportions. What sample proportion will cause further investigation of the firm if a random sample of 591 invoices is...
Liability of auditors has evolved over the past 80 years through many changes in legislation brought on by the cycle of fraud over the years and by many court cases that broadened the scope of auditor liability. Do you believe the courts and legislatures in establishing auditor liability have been fair to the auditors or too harsh on the auditors? Discuss why you believe the way you do.
Liability of auditors has evolved over the past 80 years through many changes in legislation brought on by the cycle of fraud over the years and by many court cases that broadened the scope of auditor liability. Discuss the difference between common law and statutory law.
Liability of auditors has evolved over the past 80 years through many changes in legislation brought on by the cycle of fraud over the years and by many court cases that broadened the scope of auditor liability. Briefly discuss each of the following court cases, describing what level of privity, if any, the plaintiffs had and what impact each case had on auditors' liability. Ultramares v. Touche Credit Alliance v. Arthur Andersen Rusch Factors, Inc. v. Levin Rosenblum, Inc. v....
QUESTION 9 Benford's Law is a probability rule frequently used by accounting auditors to detect systematic fraud. It states that approximately 10.4% of numbers will begin with the number 2. An auditor decides to investigate a particular firm further if a sample proportion of their invoices, with the invoiced number beginning with a 2, is in the highest 0.5% of all possible sample proportions. What sample proportion will cause further investigation of the firm if a random sample of 570...