Question

1) If some of the more extreme candidates for the U.S. Presidency advocated the establishment of a new government department of Vandalism and Destruction/Growth, that would employ people to Break windows and do other damage randomly in order to increase economic growth, similar to the French experience in WWII, how would you criticize this proposal?

Fill in the blanks.

    Government Income Statement for 2018,           Government Income Statement for 2019,

1) Fill in the blanks Government Income Statement for 2018, Tax Revenue $2000 Goods Service $1600 Tax Revenue $1200Gods + Service $2000 Net sale bonds.... Subsidies $2000 Net sale bond B. How would you characterize this change in government policy between 2018 and 2019? ie What Government Income Statement for 2019, Receipts Expenditure Receipts Expenditure Welfare+ Welfare + Subsidies $2000 policy control variables changed? C. Is this a deficit or surplus and how much in 2018? In 2019? Is this an expansionary or contractionary, monetary or fiscal policy?

Answer 1

Ans

The questions don't seem to be related. One is about griwth and other About fiscal policy. So can answer only 1 question as per HOMEWORKLIB POLICY

Well this is quite absurd By growth we mean increase in living standards of people over a period of time. Just breaking things and rebuilding will not increase living standards and human welfare. It will not increase even NDP but only GDP because new output gained through such methods is equal to depreciation.