Question

3. Compare and contrast the Watergate and Iran-Contra Scandals. (If you wish, you may compare them with other scandals of the Twentieth Century.)

Answer 1

UV. Raju Collego, Bhimavaram Solution : Scandles are continually happenina inside the crited States government. Some get nune consideration than others. Normally, the initial too Outrages that most Americans quietly recollect move the watergate embarragyment and Scandalous Clinton / Monica Lewinsky issue, both impeachable wongabrings shockingas, numerdes Americans neglect to recognize the Istan. Contigla issu, Arother Bresidential embarassment which included President Ronald Reagan's Stganizalion. The warogique and Tran Contora embangus -ments were altogether diftruent in nature; be that as it may, they do share likenesses in light of the fact that both cutsrages were revealed by the Docess, included top authorities, and brought about Presidential exculpations The watergate embasorgsment occupored in June 1972, in Washington, D. (., It was a poor endeavor to reveal enside data of the Democratic committee by sueplicating vital gcecids and tapping telephong.

in actuality, the Irlanaconisa undertaling occurred in 1985, when beat Reagan authorities beelt vorged to a course " American Prisoners held in Lebanon by Charming Iran with the deal, though Israel, ob weapons. Moreover, Iran was likewise burnished with a large number of against tanke Tow rockets amid the issue. Back to the 1970's, directly after the watergate thebt that happened, most Americans questioned that Nixon coas included despite the fact that 3 ob the suspects were observed to be on the buinance od Nixon's re-election Council. "poresident Reagan conceded but learning of the arms deals, however quarented that he had assumed no part in its operation and had no clue what happened to the Cash". 1. The watergate and Iran-Contra outg outstages are quite recently slight cases of the Shamebull aus that occur in the us government. That is the Selasan it is couitical to have flerzibility of Preys, in any case, since it is the reason some of these O

illicit exercises are bunely bound. These embarrassments demonstrate that rlich well-to-do class Americans barely Conbrant any automes for their unlautul activities, while a destitute non- white individual loud Prlezumably Conboont years in jail for such lorong doings as robbery se giving cash and arms to spychological apprecyzs