Question

help on these two questions

ian ulhess 4. A licensed consult natural gas under pressure. The contractor offered 5% of the profit as an ad down by 20%, and thi consultant engineer delegated the design tasks to another mechanical engineer who was paid at a lower rate. This engineer had considerable machining and fabrication experience and little experience in pressure vessel design. The consultant engineer was competent in pressure vessel design and supposed to supervise design work. The mechanical engineer was compelled to learn pressure vessel design methods and used text books for that purpose. The consultant engineer was traveling most of the time. There was a preliminary review of the design and the consultant engineer quickly approved the design because the contractor wanted to start fabrication quickly. However, a state regulator found that the design violated state statutes that govern such design work. It was also found that the pressure vessel code was not used as a design guide. ant engineer was entrusted with the design and fabrication of pressure vessels to store ditional payment if the cost was cut s offer was accepted by the consultant engineer. As a cost cutting measure, the Provide a brief critical review of the conduct of the consultant engineer and make a conclusion as to whether he violated professional ethics. Provide specific example extracted from the above passage to justify your arguments. (10 points) A.

Answer 1