Study Proves Number Bias in UK Lottery" reported on the internet about a document completed in 2002, "The Randomness of the National Lottery," which was meant to offer irrefutable proof that it was random. But the authors hit a snag when they found that one numbered ball, 38, was drawn so often that they believed there was bias in the selections, perhaps due to a physical difference in the ball: "Haigh and Goldie found that over 637 draws you would expect each number to be drawn between 70 and 86 times. But they found that 38 came up 107 times, 14 times more than the next most drawn ball. 'That is very unusual-the chance is under 1%.
A. If each number is expected to be drawn between 70 and 86 times, on average how many time is it expected to be drawn?
78
B. Based on your answer to part (A), what proportion of times is each number expected in 637 draws? (Round to the nearest thousandth.)
D. What proportion of the 637 draws did the number 38 come up? (Round to the nearest thousandth.)
E. Find z, the standardized difference between sample proportion (your answer to part [d]) and ideal proportion (your answer to part [b]
Study Proves Number Bias in UK Lottery" reported on the internet about a document completed in...
All of the following questions are in relation to the following journal article which is available on Moodle: Parr CL, Magnus MC, Karlstad O, Holvik K, Lund-Blix NA, Jaugen M, et al. Vitamin A and D intake in pregnancy, infant supplementation and asthma development: the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 2018:107:789-798 QUESTIONS: 1. State one hypothesis the author's proposed in the manuscript. 2. There is previous research that shows that adequate Vitamin A intake is required...