You have two sites running Hyper-V servers. All servers in both sites are members of the same domain. You want to ensure high availability of the VMs running on Hyper-V servers and can’t afford data loss as a result of a failover. What should you use?
|
a. Multisite Hyper-V cluster |
||
|
b. Hyper-V Replica |
||
|
c. Microsoft Azure Backup |
||
|
d. Live migration |
option a
by using Multisite Hyper-V cluster,we can ensure high avalaibility in virtual machines
You have two sites running Hyper-V servers. All servers in both sites are members of the...
You have a network consisting of three sites and 15 member servers. Both SiteA and SiteB have six of the member servers, and SiteC has three member servers. SiteA and SiteB are across town from each other, and SiteC is in another state. Your environment is heavily virtualized, with Hyper-V running on 4 servers each in SiteA and SiteB and a total of 24 VMs spread evenly among the servers. Each server is capable of running double the number of...
You have two Windows Server 2012 R2 computers with the Hyper-V role installed. Both computers have two hard drives, one for the system volume and the other for data. One server, named HyperVTest, is going to be used mainly for testing and what-if scenarios, and its data drive is 250 GB. You estimate that you might have 8 or 10 VMs configured on HyperVTest with two or three running at the same time. Each test VM has disk requirements ranging...
You administer nine virtual file servers on a single Hyper-V physical host that contains two 8-core processors. Currently, each server is running Windows Server 2012 Standard edition on one host. You are thinking of migrating these servers to Windows Server 2016. Over a three-day period, you discover the following load for the virtual file servers: Avg Proc 95% CPU utilization Server 1 25 5% Server 2 25 3% Server 3 35 6% Server 4 15 5% Server 5 15 3%...
Risk management in Information Security today Everyday information security professionals are bombarded with marketing messages around risk and threat management, fostering an environment in which objectives seem clear: manage risk, manage threat, stop attacks, identify attackers. These objectives aren't wrong, but they are fundamentally misleading.In this session we'll examine the state of the information security industry in order to understand how the current climate fails to address the true needs of the business. We'll use those lessons as a foundation...