At the end of the year, overhead applied was $3,669,000. Actual overhead was $3,202,000. Closing over/underapplied overhead into Cost of Goods Sold would cause net income to
a.increase by $467,000
b.decrease by $467,000
c.increase by $934,000
d.decrease by $934,000
Ans A increase by $467000
Reason is explanation as follows
Underapplied overhead:
When there is a debit balance in the manufacturing overhead account during the month end, it indicates that overheads applied to jobs are less than the actual overhead cost incurred by the business. Therefore, the debit balance in the manufacturing overhead account is referred to as underapplied overhead.
Overapplied overhead:
When there is a credit balance in the manufacturing overhead account during the month end, indicates that overheads applied to jobs is more than the actual overhead cost incurred by the business. Therefore, the credit balance in the manufacturing overhead account is referred to as overapplied overhead.
hence given case is over applied over head since applied overheads are more than actual over heads ($3669-$3202)by $467000, in case of over applied over head , cost of goods sold will decrease .
When the cost of goods sold decreases, net income is increased because there is more profit from the sale of the product. Critics of this accounting method of dealing with underapplied manufacturing overhead say it should be recorded on the income statement under cost of unused capacity to make it less complicated to see.
At the end of the year, overhead applied was $3,669,000. Actual overhead was $3,202,000. Closing over/underapplied...
At the end of the year, overhead applied was $3,717,000. Actual overhead was $3,145,000. Closing over/underapplied overhead into Cost of Goods Sold would cause net income toa.increase by $572,000b.decrease by $572,000c.increase by $1,144,000d.decrease by $1,144,000
At the end of the year, overhead applied was $3,706,000. Actual overhead was $3,418,000. Closing over/underapplied overhead into Cost of Goods Sold would cause net income to a.decrease by $576,000 b.decrease by $288,000 c.increase by $288,000 d.increase by $576,000 A manufacturing company applies factory overhead based on direct labor hours. At the beginning of the year, it estimated that factory overhead costs would be $345,800 and direct labor hours would be 42,600. Actual manufacturing overhead costs incurred were $320,800, and...
At the end of the year, overhead applied was $3,729,000. Actual overhead was $3,454,000. Closing over/underapplied overhead into cost of goods sold would cause net income to A. increase $275,000 B. Decrease $275,000 C. increase $550,000 D. decrease $550,000
At the end of the year, overhead applied was $3,733,000. Actual overhead was $3,242,000. Closing over/underapplied overhead into Cost of Goods sold would cause net income to Oa, increase by $491,000 Ob. decrease by $491,000 Oc, increase by $982,000 Od decrease by $982,000
At the end of the year, overhead applied was $3,682,000. Actual overhead was $3,485,000. Closing over/underapplied overhead into Cost of Goods Sold would cause net income to a. decrease by $197,000 b. increase by $394,000 c. decrease by $394,000 d. increase by $197,000 Only have 30 more minutes to answer. please help
Calculator At the end of the year, overhead applied was $3,708,000. Actual overhead was $3,466,000. Closing over/underapplied overhead into Cost of Goods Sold would cause net income to a. decrease by $242,000 b. increase by $242,000 c. decrease by $484,000 d. increase by $484,000
Overhead Variance (Over-or Underapplied), Closing to Cost of Goods Sold At the end of the year, Ilberg Company provided the following actual information: Overhead $423,600 Direct labor cost 532,000 Ilberg uses normal costing and applies overhead at the rate of 80% of direct labor cost. At the end of the year, Cost of Goods Sold (before adjusting for any overhead variance) was $896,000. Required: 1. Calculate the overhead variance for the year. $ 2,000 ✓ overapplied 2. Dispose of the...
At the end of the year, overhead applied was $42,000,000. Actual overhead was $40,300,000. Closing over/underscored overhead into Coto Goods income to a. Increase by $3,400,000 b. decrease by $1,700,000 C. Increase by $1,700,000 d. decrease by $3,400,000
At the end of the year, overhead applied was $42,000,000. Actual overhead was $40,300,000. Closing over/underscored overhead into Coto Goods income to a. Increase by $3,400,000 b. decrease by $1,700,000 C. Increase by $1,700,000 d. decrease by $3,400,000
Overhead Variance (Over- or Underapplied), Closing to Cost of Goods Sold At the end of the year, Pryor Company provided the following actual information: Overhead: $414,720 Direct labour cost: $512,000 Pryor uses normal costing and applies overhead at the rate of 80% of direct labour cost. At the end of the year, Cost of Goods Sold (before adjusting for any overhead variance) was $887,000. Required: 1. Calculate the overhead variance for the year. 2. Dispose of the overhead variance by...