In the present situation of S corporation, below is the computation of apportionment factor.
Josey does not have any property or payroll in State X, it does not have any nexus with state X.
Ans a | |||||||||
Calculation | Sharon | Carol | Josey | Janice | |||||
Sales ($) | A | X | sales in state X | 79,700 | 16,000 | 17,800 | 11,500 | ||
B | Total ($) | Total | 126,000 | 87,300 | 58,600 | 43,000 | |||
C | Proportion | A / B | 0.6325 | 0.1833 | 0.3038 | 0.2674 | upto 4 decimals | ||
Property ($) | D | X | Property in state X | 59,250 | 28,100 | 0 | 19,500 | ||
E | Total ($) | Total | 128,250 | 114,850 | 45,750 | 60,000 | |||
F | Proportion | D / E | 0.4620 | 0.2447 | 0.0000 | 0.3250 | upto 4 decimals | ||
Payroll ($) | G | X | payroll in state X | 13,300 | 15,400 | 0 | 0 | ||
H | Total ($) | Total | 13,300 | 59,150 | 5,000 | 26,400 | |||
I | Proportion | G / H | 1.0000 | 0.2604 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | upto 4 decimals | ||
J | |||||||||
K | Total apportionment | C+F+ I | 2.0945 | 0.6883 | NA | 0.5924 | |||
APPORTIONMENT FACTOR | L | DIVIDE BY 3 | K / 3 | 0.6982 | 0.2294 | NA | 0.1975 | upto 4 decimals | |
We are not going to calculate the apportionment for property or payroll since Josey has no property or payroll. | |||||||||
1 Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.) Part 1 of 4...
3 Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.) Part 3 of 4 Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which form a single unitary group. Assume sales operations are within the solicitation bounds of Public Law 86-272. Each of the corporations has operations in the following states: 2.5 points eBook De Domicile State Dividend income Business income Sales : State x State Y State...
Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which form a single unitary group. Assume sales operations are within the solicitation bounds of Public Law 86-272. Each of the corporations has operations in the following states: 2 Part 2 of 4 2.5 points Domicile State Dividend income Business income Sales: State x State Y State z State A State B Property: State x State Y State Z State A...
Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which form a single unitary group. Assume sales operations are within the solicitation bounds of Public Law 86-272. Each of the corporations has operations in the following states Janice Corp. State Z Sharon Inc. Carol Corp. Josey Corp. State X State Y StateZ Domicile State (throwback) (throwback) (nonthrowback) (nonthrowback) Dividend income Business income Sales: $1,580 $69,000 $81,700 $ 405 $49,500 $16,400...
a. Calculate the State X apportionment factor for Sharon Inc., Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp. b. Calculate the business income apportioned to State X. c. Calculate the taxable income for State X for each company. d. Determine the tax liability for State X for the entire group. Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Cor., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which...
Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which form a single unitary group. Assume sales operations are within the solicitation bounds of Public Law 86-272. Each of the corporations has operations in the following states: Domicile State Sharon Inc. State X (throwback) Carol Corp. State Y (throwback) Josey Corp. State Z (nonthrowback) Janice Corp. State Z (nonthrowback) Dividend income $ 1,000 $ 200 $ 300 $ 500 Business...
Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which form a single unitary group. Assume sales operations are within the solicitation bounds of Public Law 86-272. Each of the corporations has operations in the following states: Compute the following for State X assuming a tax rate of 15 percent. (Use an equally weighted three-factor apportionment. Round all apportionment factors to 4 decimal places. Round other answers to the nearest...
Sharon Inc. is headquartered in State X and owns 100 percent of Carol Corp., Josey Corp., and Janice Corp., which form a single unitary group. Assume sales operations are within the solicitation bounds of Public Law 86-272. Each of the corporations has operations in the following states: Compute the following for State X assuming a tax rate of 15 percent. (Use an equally weighted three-factor apportionment. Round all apportionment factors to 4 decimal places. Round other answers to the nearest...
Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Nicole’s Salon, a Louisiana corporation, operates beauty salons in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Tennessee. These salon’s payroll by state are as follows: Nicole’s Salon State Payroll Arkansas $ 138,000 Louisiana 366,750 Tennessee 726,000 Total $ 1,230,750 What are the payroll apportionment factors for Arkansas, Louisiana, and Tennessee in each of the following alternative scenarios? (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.) rev: 11_21_2018_QC_CS-148519 a. Nicole’s Salon has income tax nexus...
Required Information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Part 1 of 3 In 2018, Laureen is currently single. She pald $2,460 of qualified tuition and related expenses for each of her twin daughters Sherl and Merl to attend State University as freshmen ($2,460 each for a total of $4,920). Sherl and Merl qualify as Laureen's dependents. Laureen also paid $1,780 for her son Ryan's (also Laureen's dependent) tultion and related expenses to attend his Junior year at...
Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.) Most Company has an opportunity to invest in one of two new projects. Project Y requires a $310,000 investment for new machinery with a five-year life and no salvage value. Project Z requires a $310,000 investment for new machinery with a four-year life and no salvage value. The two projects yield the following predicted annual results. The company uses straight-line depreciation, and cash flows occur evenly throughout each year....