5. Let f : [a, b] → R be bounded, a : [a, b] → R monotonically increasing, and P a partition of [a, b]. (a) Define upper and lower Riemann-Stieltjes sums of f with respect to P and a. (b) Let P' be the partition obtained from P by inserting one additional point x' into the subinterval (2k-1, xk] of P. Prove that for the lower and upper Riemann- Stieltjes sums of f we have L(P, f, a) <L(P',...
1. Let a, b E R with a < b and P= {20, 21, ..., In} be a partition of the interval [a, b]. Denote At; = x; – X;-1 for j = 1,2,...,n. Consider a function f : [a, b] → R. (a) (4 points) What do we need to require from f in order to be able to define the upper and lower Riemann sums of f over P? (b) (8 points) Define the upper and the lower...
with respect to the partitionl0, 21,12,* 1I,o1F. Let f : DC R" - R, where D is bounded and f is continuous on D on D. Show that f is Riemann integrable on D R-R where f is hounded and as constant. Evaluate the 시 with respect to the partitionl0, 21,12,* 1I,o1F. Let f : DC R" - R, where D is bounded and f is continuous on D on D. Show that f is Riemann integrable on D R-R...
does anyone know how to do this question5b in both direction? 5. Let 01, 02, ... be a strictly increasing sequence in (a,b), and let p > 0 be such that ... Pr = 1. Define a : [a,b] R as follows: a(x) = 0 if a srca, a(x) = p«ifa, <<< an+1, 1 and a(x) = 1 if supan Sasb. (a) For a sc<dsb, describe Aa = o(d) - a(c) in terms of an and Ph. (Thus, convince yourself...
4. (bonus question) Prove the positive part of the Riemann-Lebesgue theorem: Let f : [a, b] → R be bounded and assume that f : [a, b] → R is continuous in [a, b]\ for some SCR with Lebesgue measure zero. Show that f is Riemann-integrable.
hint This exercise 5 to use the definition of Riemann integral F. Let f : [a, b] → R be a bounded function. Suppose there exist a sequence of partitions {Pk} of [a, b] such that lim (U(Pk, f) – L (Pk,f)) = 0. k20 Show that f is Riemann integrable and that Så f = lim (U(P«, f)) = lim (L (Pk,f)). k- k0 1,0 < x <1 - Suppose f : [-1, 1] → R is defined as...
3. Let f, g : a, b] → R be functions such that f is integrable, g is continuous. and g(x) 〉 0 for all x є a,b]. Since both f, g are bounded, let K 〉 0 be such that |f(x) K and g(x) < K for all x E [a,b (a) Let n > 0 be given. Prove that there is a partition P of [a, b such that for all i 2. (b) Let P be a...
3. Let f, g : [a,b] → R be functions such that f is integrable, g is continuous, and g(x) >0 for all r E [a, b] Since both f,g are bounded, let K >0 be such that lf(z)| K and g(x) K for all x E [a3] (a) Let n > 0 be given. Prove that there is a partition P of [a, b such that U (P. f) _ L(P./) < η and Mi(P4)-mi(P4) < η for all...
Integral: If you know all about it you should be easy to prove..... Let f:[a,b]→R and g:[a,b]→R be two bounded functions. Suppose f≤g on [a,b]. Use the information to prove thatL(f)≤L(g)andU(f)≤U(g). Information: g : [0, 1] —> R be defined by if x=0, g(x)=1; if x=m/n (m and n are positive integer with no common factor), g(x)=1/n; if x doesn't belong to rational number, g(x)=0 g is discontinuous at every rational number in[0,1]. g is Riemann integrable on [0,1] based...
3. Let f, g : a, bl → R be functions such that f is integrable, g is continuous. and g(x) >0 for al x E [a, b]. Since both f,g are bounded, let K> 0 be such that f(x)| 〈 K and g(x)-K for all x E la,b] (a) Let η 〉 0 be given. Prove that there is a partition P of a,b] such that for all i (b) Let P be a partition as in (a). Prove...