Thirty-two patients suffering from depression were randomly assigned to one of four drug treatment groups: 0 mg (placebo), 1 mg, 2 mg, or 3 mg of antidepressant drug. The table below summarizes the patients' improvement scores in personal adjustment following one month of drug therapy.
Treatment | ||||
1 (0 mg) | 2 (1 mg) | 3 (2 mg) | 4 (3 mg) | |
n | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
sum | 43 | 57 | 102 | 92 |
means | 5.38 | 7.13 | 12.75 | 11.50 |
Source | SS | df | MS | F |
Between (A) | (1) | (2) | (5) | (7) |
Within (Error) | 528.24 | (3) | (6) | |
Total | 822.87 | (4) |
Contrast 1: Treatment 1 vs. treatment 2
Contrast 2: Treatment 3 vs. treatment 4
Contrast 3: Treatments 1 and 2 vs. treatment 3 and 4
WITHOUT doing the actual analysis, could one do this test, indicating why or why not? (7)
Answer:
Given Data
(a) What are the independent and dependent variables.
The independent variable is the four treatment groups. The dependent variable is the improvement scores.
(b) Above is a partially completed ANOVA summary table. Each missing cell is labelled. Use the space below to provide the missing components .
Source | SS | df | MS | F |
Between | 294.63 | 3 | 98.21 | 5.20574 |
Error | 528.24 | 28 | 18.86571 | |
Total | 822.87 | 31 |
The p-value is 0.0055.
Since the p-value (0.0055) is less than the significance level (0.05),
we can reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we can conclude that there is a significant difference between the four treatment groups.
(c) Let's say you had planned to use the most powerful comparison test possible to determine whether or not the following contrasts are significant:
Contrast 1: Treatment 1 vs. treatment 2
Contrast 2: Treatment 3 vs. treatment 4
Contrast 3: Treatments 1 and 2 vs. treatment 3 and 4
There is no significant difference.
There is no significant difference.
There is a significant difference.
****Please like it.....
It is important to me.......
Thank you for supporting me....
Thirty-two patients suffering from depression were randomly assigned to one of four drug treatment groups: 0...
Thirty-two patients suffering from depression were randomly assigned to one of four drug treatment groups: 0 mg (placebo), 1 mg, 2 mg, or 3 mg of antidepressant drug. The table below summarizes the patients' improvement scores in personal adjustment following one month of drug therapy. Treatment | 1 (0 mg) 2 (1 mg) 3 (2 mg) 4 (3 mg) 8 8 43 57 102 92 means 5.38 7.13 12.75 11.50 n 8 8 sum MS IF Source SS df Between...
Thirty-two patients suffering from depression were randomly assigned to one of four drug treatment groups: 0 mg (placebo), 1 mg, 2 mg, or 3 mg of antidepressant drug. The table below summarizes the patients' improvement scores in personal adjustment following one month of drug therapy. Treatment 1 (0 mg) 2 (1 mg) 3 (2 mg) 4 (3 mg) In 18 8 8 8 sum 43 57 102 92 means 5.38 7.13 12.75 11.50 Source SS df MSF Between (A) (2)...
Four treatments (Placebo, A, B, C) were randomly assigned to 32 patients. Data below give for each treatment the number of days (response variable y) for healing to be complete: Treatment Number of days (y) Means 7, 8, 7,7, 10, 12, 9,8 10, 11, 10, 12, 9, 10, 12, 11 10.625 8, 6, 7,9,6, 9,8,7 5, 7, 8, 6, 7,4,5,6 Placebo 8.5 7.5 6.0 1. Consider the test of hypothesis for the non-pairwise linear contrast: Let alpha 0.05 Use Sheffe's...
2. An experiment was conducted to compare five treatments for reducing fever. Thirty-five patients were randomly assigned into five treatment groups. The patients' temperatures were taken two hours after receiving the treatment, and are given below. We will test the claim that there is no difference in mean body temperature among each of the five treatment groups using a 5% significance level. Placebo Aspirin Anacin Tylenol Bufferin 98.3 96.0 97.2 95.1 96.1 98.7 96.6 97.4 95.7 96.5 98.1 95.3 96.9...
Participants is a study on learning were randomly assigned into one of two treatment conditions. Is there a difference between the average exam grade for students who use note cards when they study , compared to those who only read their assignment? ( Alpha = 0.5) Note cards 7, 3, 4, 4 ,6, 8 Readers 1 ,4 ,2, 2, 3 ,1
Problem Set 1: The One-way ANOVA Research Scenario: Depressed patients are randomly assigned to 1 of 3 therapists. At the end of 3 months, each patient completes a standardized test of depression (higher scores indicate higher level of depression). The patients’ scores are shown below. Analyze the data to determine how effective these 3 therapists are at treating depression (assume that before the treatment, all 3 groups of patients had the same average depression score). Using this table, enter the...
6) It has been study. One een levels of treatment for the new drug will be used in the 2 study. One group will be administered the new phase of the drug once per day and a second group twice per day. You select two SRSs of 19 and 21 individuals who have been diagnosed as having high n diagnosed adrug twice per administered the new drug once per dayad cholest total cholesterol. Results are summarized in the table below....
Prednisolone is a relatively new drug for treating inflammatory diseases. This drug replaces prednisone, a corticosteroid that can cause patients to develope osteoporosis, low bone density if the drug is used for a prolonged time period. Here, we are comparing a group of 30 cats receiving prednisolone to a group of 30 cats receiving a placebo. The cats receiving a placebo will serve as a control group. After receiving treatment for 6 weeks a bone scan was done to assess...
An experiment on memory was performed, in which 16 subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups, called "Sentences" or "Intentional". Each subject was given a list of 50 words. Subjects in the "Sentences" group were told to form multiple sentences, each using at least two words from the list, and to keep forming sentences until all the words were used at least once. Subjects in the "Intentional" group were told to spend five minutes memorizing as many of...
Identify the scientific premise, main hypothesis addressed by the paper and the research question of the paper Also, what is the main results and the implication of results IMPORTANCE Clinical outcomes for glioblastoma remain poor. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade has shown benefits in many cancer types. To our knowledge, data from a randomized phase 3 clinical trial evaluating a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapy for glioblastoma have not been reported. OBJECTIVE To determine whether single-agent PD-1 blockade with nivolumab...