Question

A study of the surface roughness of coated interior pipe used in oil fields was conducted. The data in micrometers) for 20 sa
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Using Minitab,

  1. Open the sample data,
  2. Open the 1-Sample Sign dialog box.
    • Statistics > 1-Sample Inference > Sign
    • STATISTICS > One Sample > Sign
  3. In Sample, enter %
  4. Select Perform hypothesis test.
  5. In Hypothesized median, enter 18.
  6. Click OK.

MTB > STest 2 data! SUBC> Alternative -1. Sign Test for Median: data Sign test of median = 2.000 versus < 2.000 Below data N

The null hypothesis states that the median equals 2. Because the p-value is approximately 0.9423, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we cannot reject the null hypothesis.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
A study of the surface roughness of coated interior pipe used in oil fields was conducted....
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • A study of the surface roughness of coated interior pipe used in old was conducted. The...

    A study of the surface roughness of coated interior pipe used in old was conducted. The data in micrometers) for 20 sampled pipe ons we reproduced in the table below. Conducta sormetto whether the median surface roughness of coated interior pipe, differs from 2 micrometers. Test using 0.10 1.87 2.65 2.48 142 198 1.35 2.65 2.70 2.78 2.75 Fuldata set 2.01 2.50 1.47 2.35 1.72 2.35 1.86 2.25 2.65 2.24 What are the null and afternative hypotheses? O A. Hon=13...

  • uc A study of the surface roughness of coated interior pipe used in oil fields was...

    uc A study of the surface roughness of coated interior pipe used in oil fields was conducted. The data in micrometers) for 20 sampled pipe sections are reproduced in the table below. Conduct nonparametric test to determine whether the median surface roughness of coated interior pipe, differs from 2 micrometers. Test using a 0.10 2.43 1.80 1.78 2.52 1.25 236 237 2.20 1.34 2.62 Fuldataset 1.44 1.39 1.46 2.37 2.44 2.09 1.57 2.10 2.80 1.64 What are the null and...

  • 2.73 Surface roughness of pipe. Refer to the Anti-corrosion Methods and Materials (Vol. 50, 2003) study...

    2.73 Surface roughness of pipe. Refer to the Anti-corrosion Methods and Materials (Vol. 50, 2003) study of the sur- face roughness of coated oil field pipes, Exercise 2.20 (p. 37). The data (in micrometers) are repeated in the table. Give an interval that will likely contain about 95% of all coated pipe roughness measurements. ROUGHPIPE - - - 1.72 2.50 2.16 2.57 2.64 1.26 2.13 1.06 2.24 2.31 2.03 1.09 1.40 2.05 1.19 2.13 1.27 1.51 2.41 1.95 - -...

  • REGRESSION 2 • reg bught cigs faminc male Source SS df MS = = Model Residual...

    REGRESSION 2 • reg bught cigs faminc male Source SS df MS = = Model Residual 20477.12 554134.6 3 6825.70666 1,384 400.386272 Number of obs F(3, 1384) Prob > R-squared Adj R-squared Root MSE 1,388 17.05 0.0000 0.0356 0.0335 20.01 - Total 574611.72 1,387 414.283864 bwght Coef. Std. Err. Piti (95Conf. Intervall cigs famine male _cons -.4610457 0913378 .09687980291453 3.113968 1.076396 115.2277 1.20788 -5.050.000 3.32 0.001 2.89 0.004 95.400.000 -.6402212 .0397062 1.002423 112.8582 - 2818702 .1540535 5.225513 117.5972 f) Conduct...

  • 1. Two manufacturing processes are being compared to try to reduce the number of defective products...

    1. Two manufacturing processes are being compared to try to reduce the number of defective products made. During 8 shifts for each process, the following results were observed: Line A Line B n 181 | 187 Based on a 5% significance level, did line B have a larger average than line A? *Use the tables I gave you in the handouts for the critical values *Use the appropriate test statistic value, NOT the p-value method *Use and show the 5...

  • Gain (V/V) R Setting Totals Averages Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 4 ап 7.8 8.1...

    Gain (V/V) R Setting Totals Averages Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 4 ап 7.8 8.1 7.9 3 5.2 6.0 4.3 = 359.3 i=1 j=1 2 4.4 6.9 3.8 1 2.0 1.7 0.8 This is actual data from one of Joe Tritschler's audio engineering experiments. Use Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to test the null hypothesis that the treatment means are equal at the a = 0.05 level of significance. Fill in the ANOVA table. Source of Variation Sum of Squares...

  • Gain (V/V) R Setting Totals Averages Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 4 ап 7.8 8.1...

    Gain (V/V) R Setting Totals Averages Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 4 ап 7.8 8.1 7.9 3 5.2 6.0 4.3 = 359.3 i=1 j=1 2 4.4 6.9 3.8 1 2.0 1.7 0.8 This is actual data from one of Joe Tritschler's audio engineering experiments. Use Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to test the null hypothesis that the treatment means are equal at the a = 0.05 level of significance. Fill in the ANOVA table. Source of Variation Sum of Squares...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT